GED Free

U.S. Foreign Policy Since 9/11

The September 11 attacks, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, homeland security, globalization and today's alliances—told through the documents.

Practice this skill 25 min American foreign policy since 9/11 Leer en español
Key idea

What you'll learn

In plain words: this lesson covers how the U.S. responded to the 9/11 attacks and how its role in the world has changed since then.

This lesson covers U.S. foreign policy from the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to the present. It sticks to facts and to what official documents say. The GED tests your ability to read sources about recent events carefully. It does not test your opinions about them. You will learn:

  • what happened on September 11, 2001, and who was responsible;
  • what the war on terror was and how Congress authorized it;
  • the main events of the wars in Afghanistan (2001–2021) and Iraq (2003–2011);
  • how the government reorganized for homeland security (the PATRIOT Act, the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security);
  • how globalization and alliances such as NATO have shaped recent foreign policy.

How it shows up on the GED: expect presidential addresses, federal laws, government reports, timelines and charts. Questions ask for:

  • a speaker's meaning or the purpose of a law;
  • the order of events, or what a chart shows;
  • how a document connects to a principle, such as the war powers of Congress.

Neutral reading is the key skill. Tell the difference between what a source claims and what the evidence shows. It is like a sports replay: the coach may claim a foul, but the video shows what happened.

Words to know

Key terms

  • terrorism — the use of violence against civilians to achieve political goals.
  • al Qaeda — the terrorist network, led by Osama bin Laden, that carried out the 9/11 attacks.
  • Taliban — the group that ruled most of Afghanistan in 2001 and sheltered al Qaeda; it returned to power in 2021.
  • war on terror — the U.S. campaign against terrorist groups and the governments that support them, announced in 2001.
  • Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) — the 2001 joint resolution in which Congress authorized force against those responsible for 9/11.
  • homeland security — protecting the country from attacks and disasters inside its borders.
  • USA PATRIOT Act — the 2001 law expanding surveillance powers and information sharing.
  • Department of Homeland Security (DHS) — the Cabinet department created in 2002 from 22 agencies.
  • weapons of mass destruction (WMD) — chemical, biological or nuclear weapons that can kill large numbers of people.
  • insurgency — an armed uprising against a government or occupying force.
  • surge — a temporary increase in troops (Iraq, 2007).
  • globalization — the growing connection of world economies through trade, investment, travel and technology.
  • alliance — a formal agreement between nations to support each other (NATO).
  • invoke — to formally put a rule into effect (NATO invoked Article 5 on September 12, 2001).

All Social Studies words in the glossary

1. September 11, 2001

Timeline of U.S. foreign policy, 2001 to 2021: September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks; October 2001 U.S.-led war in Afghanistan begins and the USA PATRIOT Act is signed; November 2002 Homeland Security Act creates the Department of Homeland Security; March 2003 U.S.-led invasion of Iraq; May 2011 Osama bin Laden killed in Pakistan; December 2011 last U.S. combat troops leave Iraq; August 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan completed. U.S. Foreign Policy After 9/11, 2001–2021 Sept. 2001 9/11 attacks Oct. 2001 Afghanistan war; PATRIOT Act Nov. 2002 Homeland Security Act Mar. 2003 Iraq invasion May 2011 Bin Laden killed Dec. 2011 U.S. troops leave Iraq Aug. 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal

In plain words: on September 11, 2001, terrorists turned airliners into weapons, and the U.S. and its allies responded within days.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, 19 al Qaeda terrorists hijacked four airliners:

  • Two struck the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City.
  • One struck the Pentagon near Washington, D.C.
  • The fourth, United Flight 93, crashed near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, after passengers fought back.

Nearly 3,000 people were killed. It was the deadliest foreign attack on U.S. soil.

Immediate responses:

  • September 12: NATO invoked — formally put into effect — Article 5 (an attack on one is an attack on all). It was the first time ever.
  • September 14–18: Congress passed and the president signed the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
  • September 20: President George W. Bush told Congress, "Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there." He demanded that the Taliban hand over al Qaeda's leaders.
  • 2004: the bipartisan 9/11 Commission reported "four kinds of failures: in imagination, policy, capabilities, and management." Congress followed with a law (2004). It created a Director of National Intelligence to coordinate the nation's intelligence agencies.

Look at the figure: the first responses came within days.

Timeline of the first weeks after the September 11, 2001, attacks. September 11: 19 al Qaeda hijackers attack; nearly 3,000 killed. September 12: NATO invokes Article 5 for the first time. September 14 to 18: Congress passes the Authorization for Use of Military Force and the president signs it. September 20: Bush tells Congress the war on terror begins. October 7: U.S. and allied military operations in Afghanistan begin. Nine days passed from the attacks to the speech and under four weeks to military action.The First Weeks: Responses to 9/11 (2001)Sept. 11Sept. 18Sept. 25Oct. 2Oct. 7Sept. 1119 al Qaeda hijackers;nearly 3,000 killedSept. 12NATO invokes Article 5for the first timeSept. 14–18Congress passes the AUMF;president signs itSept. 20Bush to Congress:"war on terror"Oct. 7military operationsin Afghanistan beginNine days from the attacks to the "war on terror" speech; under four weeks to military action.

2. The war in Afghanistan (2001–2021)

In plain words: the war in Afghanistan began in 2001 to fight al Qaeda and the Taliban, and it ended with the U.S. leaving in 2021.

DateEvent
Oct. 2001U.S. and allied military operations begin after the Taliban refuses to hand over al Qaeda's leaders
Dec. 2001Taliban driven from power; a new Afghan government forms
2003 onwardNATO leads the international security force; the Taliban regroups as an insurgency
2009–2010U.S. troop increase, reaching about 100,000 troops
May 2011Osama bin Laden killed by U.S. forces in Abbottabad, Pakistan
Feb. 2020U.S.–Taliban agreement on withdrawing U.S. forces
Aug. 2021Taliban takes Kabul; last U.S. troops leave August 30

An insurgency is an armed uprising against a government or an occupying force. About 2,400 U.S. service members died in Afghanistan. President Biden called it "the longest war in American history."

Timeline drawn to scale of the war in Afghanistan, 2001 to 2021. October 2001: U.S. and allied operations begin. December 2001: the Taliban are driven from power. 2003 on: NATO leads the security force and the Taliban insurgency grows. 2009 to 2010: U.S. troop increase to about 100,000. May 2011: Osama bin Laden killed in Pakistan. February 2020: U.S.–Taliban agreement on withdrawal. August 2021: the Taliban take Kabul and the last U.S. troops leave. A bracket shows about 10 years from the start of the war to bin Laden's death; the whole war lasted about 20 years.The War in Afghanistan, 2001–2021 (to scale)200120052009201320172021Oct. 2001operations beginDec. 2001Taliban drivenfrom power2003 onNATO leads securityforce; insurgency grows2009–2010troop increase toabout 100,000May 2011bin Laden killedin PakistanFeb. 2020U.S.–TalibanagreementAug. 2021Taliban takes Kabul;last U.S. troops leavestart to bin Laden's death: about 10 yearswhole war: about 20 years

Example: A GED item might ask how many years passed between the start of the war (2001) and bin Laden's death (2011). The answer: about ten.

3. The war in Iraq (2003–2011)

In plain words: the U.S. invaded Iraq in 2003 because of a claimed weapons threat; no weapons stockpiles were found.

In 2002–2003, the Bush administration argued that Iraq's dictator, Saddam Hussein, had weapons of mass destruction. It said he posed a threat. Congress passed a resolution authorizing force against Iraq in October 2002. A U.S.-led coalition invaded in March 2003. Baghdad fell in April. Saddam was captured in December 2003.

  • No stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction were found. A U.S. survey team reported this in 2004.
  • An insurgency and fighting among religious and ethnic groups followed. In 2007, President Bush ordered a troop surge — a temporary increase in troops. Violence later declined.
  • Under a 2008 agreement with Iraq's government, U.S. combat troops left in December 2011. Nearly 4,500 U.S. service members died.
  • In 2014, the terrorist group ISIS seized parts of Iraq and Syria. The U.S. led an international coalition against it. ISIS lost the last of that territory in 2019.
Three-step diagram for the Iraq war. Claim, 2002 to 2003: Saddam Hussein has weapons of mass destruction; signal words argued and claimed. Action, March 2003: a U.S.-led coalition invades Iraq and Baghdad falls in April. Finding, 2004: a U.S. survey team reports that no WMD stockpiles were found; signal words reported and found. Caption: the claim was the stated reason for the war; the later evidence did not support it.Iraq: Claim, Action, FindingCLAIM (2002–2003)Saddam Hussein hasweapons of massdestruction (WMD)ACTION (March 2003)U.S.-led coalitioninvades Iraq;Baghdad falls in AprilFINDING (2004)U.S. survey team:no WMD stockpileswere foundsignal words: argued, claimedsignal words: reported, foundThe claim was the stated reason for the war; the later evidence did not support it.

Example: A question asks for the stated reason for the invasion. The answer is the WMD threat. This is true even though the later finding did not support it.

Keep the two wars apart with this chart:

Comparison chart of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Years: Afghanistan 2001 to 2021; Iraq 2003 to 2011. Main target: al Qaeda and the Taliban; Saddam Hussein's government. Stated reason: they planned and sheltered the 9/11 attacks; claimed weapons of mass destruction, none found. Authorized by: the AUMF of September 2001; a resolution of Congress in October 2002. Leader removed: bin Laden killed in 2011 but the war went on to 2021; Saddam captured in 2003 but the war went on to 2011. U.S. deaths: about 2,400; nearly 4,500.Two Wars ComparedAFGHANISTANIRAQYears2001–20212003–2011Main targetal Qaeda and the TalibanSaddam Hussein's governmentStated reasonthey planned and shelteredthe 9/11 attacksclaimed weapons of massdestruction (none found)Authorized byAUMF, September 2001Congress, October 2002Leader removedbin Laden killed 2011;war went on to 2021Saddam captured 2003;war went on to 2011U.S. deathsabout 2,400nearly 4,500

4. Homeland security at home

In plain words: after 9/11, the government created new agencies and powers to protect the country, and people still debate the balance between safety and freedom.

ChangeYearPurpose
USA PATRIOT Act2001expanded surveillance and information sharing among agencies
Transportation Security Administration (TSA)2001federal screening of airline passengers and baggage
Department of Homeland Security (DHS)2002combined 22 agencies (Coast Guard, Secret Service, FEMA, TSA and others)
Director of National Intelligence2004coordinates intelligence agencies, as the 9/11 Commission recommended
Diagram of how the government reorganized for homeland security. Arrows lead from the Coast Guard, the Secret Service, FEMA, the TSA (created 2001) and 18 more agencies into the Department of Homeland Security, created in 2002 from 22 agencies. Separately, the 9/11 Commission report of 2004 recommended a Director of National Intelligence, created in 2004 to coordinate intelligence agencies. Caption: DHS protects the homeland; the Department of Defense fights wars abroad.Reorganizing for Homeland SecurityCoast GuardSecret ServiceFEMATSA (created 2001)… and 18 more agenciesDEPARTMENT OFHOMELAND SECURITY(DHS)created 2002from 22 agencies9/11 Commission (2004)report recommends anew intelligence chiefDirector of NationalIntelligence (2004):coordinates agenciesDHS protects the homeland; the Department of Defense fights wars abroad.

These changes raised a lasting public debate about security versus civil liberties (basic personal freedoms). Think of airport screening: it adds safety, but it also costs time and privacy.

  • Supporters argued the new powers helped prevent attacks.
  • Critics argued some measures went too far. Examples include surveillance and the detention of terrorism suspects at the U.S. naval base at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba.
Balance-scale diagram of the debate over security versus civil liberties after 9/11. Left pan, security: supporters argued that new powers such as the PATRIOT Act and TSA screening helped prevent attacks. Right pan, civil liberties: critics argued some measures went too far, such as surveillance and detentions at Guantánamo Bay. Caption: Congress and the courts keep adjusting the balance, for example with the USA FREEDOM Act of 2015.The Lasting Debate: Security vs. Civil LibertiesSECURITYsupporters: new powershelped prevent attacks(PATRIOT Act, TSA screening)CIVIL LIBERTIEScritics: some measureswent too far (surveillance,Guantánamo detentions)Congress and the courts keep adjusting the balance (e.g., USA FREEDOM Act, 2015).

Congress and the courts have revisited several of these policies. For example, in 2015 the USA FREEDOM Act changed how phone records could be collected. On the GED, present both sides as the source does. Avoid choices that state an opinion as fact.

5. Globalization and alliances

Bar chart: total number of NATO member countries after each enlargement. 1949: 12 (founding members); 1952: 14; 1955: 15; 1982: 16; 1999: 19; 2004: 26; 2009: 28; 2017: 29; 2020: 30; 2023: 31; 2024: 32. Source: North Atlantic Treaty Organization; U.S. Department of State. Total NATO Member Countries After Each Enlargement 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Member countries 12 1949 14 1952 15 1955 16 1982 19 1999 26 2004 28 2009 29 2017 30 2020 31 2023 32 2024

In plain words: world trade now links the U.S. economy to other countries, and U.S. alliances have grown since the Cold War.

Globalization is the growing connection of world economies. Trade, investment and technology have tied the U.S. economy to the world. Look at the labels on your clothes or phone: many parts come from several countries.

  • China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, and global supply chains grew.
  • The North American Free Trade Agreement (1994) was replaced by the United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement (USMCA) in 2020.
  • Globalization lowered many consumer prices and opened markets. But some U.S. manufacturing jobs moved overseas. This is another topic with real debate.

Alliances:

  • NATO grew from 16 members at the end of the Cold War to 32 in 2024.
  • Russia annexed Ukraine's Crimea region in 2014. It launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.
  • The United States and its allies responded with sanctions and aid to Ukraine. Finland (2023) and Sweden (2024) joined NATO.
  • In the Indo-Pacific, the United States works with partners such as Japan, South Korea, Australia and India. This includes AUKUS (2021), a partnership with Australia and the United Kingdom.
Schematic diagram, not to scale, of U.S. alliances and partners today, with the United States in the center. NATO in Europe and Canada: 32 members in 2024, up from 16 at the end of the Cold War; Finland joined in 2023 and Sweden in 2024. Indo-Pacific partners: Japan, South Korea, Australia and India; AUKUS (2021) links Australia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. Response to Russia: sanctions on Russia and aid to Ukraine after the 2022 full-scale invasion. Trade and globalization: China joins the WTO in 2001; NAFTA (1994) is replaced by USMCA in 2020.U.S. Alliances and Partners Today (schematic, not to scale)United StatesNATO (Europe, Canada)32 members in 2024(16 at end of Cold War)Finland joined 2023Sweden joined 2024INDO-PACIFIC PARTNERSJapan, South Korea,Australia, IndiaAUKUS (2021): Australia,United Kingdom, U.S.RESPONSE TO RUSSIAsanctions on Russia andaid to Ukraine after the2022 full-scale invasionTRADE (GLOBALIZATION)China joins WTO (2001);NAFTA (1994) replacedby USMCA (2020)
Worked example

Worked example 1: Meaning of a presidential statement

Source: "Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." (George W. Bush, September 20, 2001)

Question: What was Bush telling other nations? A. All nations must send troops to Afghanistan. B. Nations could not stay neutral about terrorism. C. The U.S. would leave the United Nations. D. Terrorism was a problem only for the U.S.

Think-aloud:

  1. "Either … or …" offers only two choices. There is no middle ground.
  2. So nations could not remain neutral. They had to oppose terrorism.
  3. A goes too far (troops are not mentioned). C is not mentioned. D contradicts "every nation, in every region."
  4. Answer: B.
Worked example

Worked example 2: Which branch acted?

Source: "That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks …" (AUMF, 2001)

Question: This document shows that A. the Supreme Court approved the war B. Congress granted the president authority to use military force C. the president declared war without Congress D. NATO commanded U.S. forces

Think-aloud:

  1. "The President is authorized" → someone else is giving permission.
  2. The AUMF is a joint resolution of Congress, signed by the president.
  3. A and D are not involved; C is wrong because Congress acted.
  4. Answer: B.
Worked example

Worked example 3: Claim versus finding

Source: "The Bush administration argued that … Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction … However, a U.S. survey team later reported that Iraq did not have stockpiles of such weapons."

Question: Which statement is a fact supported by the source? A. The invasion was the right decision. B. The invasion was the wrong decision. C. Investigators did not find WMD stockpiles in Iraq. D. Iraq had large WMD stockpiles in 2003.

Think-aloud:

  1. A and B are opinions. The source does not make those judgments.
  2. D contradicts the survey team's report.
  3. C restates the finding exactly.
  4. Answer: C.
Worked example

Worked example 4: Reading a running-total chart

Bar chart: total number of NATO member countries after each enlargement. 1949: 12 (founding members); 1952: 14; 1955: 15; 1982: 16; 1999: 19; 2004: 26; 2009: 28; 2017: 29; 2020: 30; 2023: 31; 2024: 32. Source: North Atlantic Treaty Organization; U.S. Department of State. Total NATO Member Countries After Each Enlargement 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Member countries 12 1949 14 1952 15 1955 16 1982 19 1999 26 2004 28 2009 29 2017 30 2020 31 2023 32 2024

Source: the NATO chart (1999: 19 members; 2004: 26 members).

Question: How many countries joined NATO in 2004? A. 7 B. 19 C. 26 D. 45

Think-aloud:

  1. The bars show the total after each enlargement.
  2. New members = 26 − 19 = 7.
  3. B and C are single bar values; D adds them instead of subtracting.
  4. Answer: A.
Common mistake

Common traps

  • Mixing up Afghanistan and Iraq. Afghanistan = Taliban and al Qaeda, 2001–2021. Iraq = Saddam Hussein and the WMD claim, 2003–2011.
  • Assuming the wars ended when a leader was captured or killed. Saddam was captured in 2003, but the Iraq war went on to 2011. Bin Laden was killed in 2011, but the Afghan war went on to 2021.
  • Confusing DHS with the Department of Defense. DHS protects the homeland. Defense fights wars abroad.
  • Treating a stated reason as a confirmed fact. "The administration argued …" is a claim; check what later evidence showed.
  • Choosing an opinion answer. On recent-history items, choices like "was a mistake" or "was a great success" are opinions. They are correct only if the source itself makes that judgment.
  • Reading a bar's height instead of the change. In running-total charts, subtract to find how many were added.
Test strategy

GED strategy for post-9/11 foreign policy

  • Stay neutral. Pick answers that describe what sources say or what data shows. Avoid answers that praise or condemn, unless the source does.
  • Look for signal words: argued, claimed (a claim); reported, found (evidence); however (a contrast).
  • Identify the actor: Congress passes resolutions and laws; the president signs, commands and announces; NATO invokes Article 5.
  • Build a mini-timeline in your head: 2001 attacks → Afghanistan → 2002 DHS → 2003 Iraq → 2011 bin Laden, Iraq withdrawal → 2021 Afghanistan withdrawal.
  • Do the arithmetic on charts (differences and ratios). Don't guess from bar heights.
  • Check precise words such as first, only, more than half, doubled.
Diagram for identifying who acted. Congress passes laws and resolutions, such as the AUMF of 2001; an arrow leads to the president, who signs laws, commands forces and announces policy, as in the September 20 speech. NATO allies invoked Article 5 on September 12, 2001. Caption: the phrase the President is authorized means Congress gives permission and the president acts on it; the Supreme Court was not involved in the AUMF.Identify the ActorCONGRESSpasses laws andresolutions(AUMF, 2001)PRESIDENTsigns laws, commandsforces, announcespolicy (Sept. 20 speech)NATOallies invokeArticle 5(Sept. 12, 2001)"The President is authorized …" = Congress gives permission; the president acts on it.Not involved in the AUMF: the Supreme Court.

Check yourself

American foreign policy since 9/11
President George W. Bush Addresses Congress (2001)

Nine days after the September 11 attacks, President George W. Bush spoke to a joint session of Congress and the nation. U.S. officials had identified al Qaeda, a terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden and based in Afghanistan, as responsible. Afghanistan was then ruled by the Taliban.

(1) And tonight, the United States of America makes the following demands on the Taliban: Deliver to United States authorities all the leaders of al Qaeda who hide in your land. …

(2) Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated. …

(3) Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.

According to paragraph 2, how broad did President Bush say the "war on terror" would be?

Answer choices
Hint

Read both sentences of paragraph 2. Where does the war begin, and when will it end?

Check yourself

American foreign policy since 9/11
President George W. Bush Addresses Congress (2001)

Nine days after the September 11 attacks, President George W. Bush spoke to a joint session of Congress and the nation. U.S. officials had identified al Qaeda, a terrorist network led by Osama bin Laden and based in Afghanistan, as responsible. Afghanistan was then ruled by the Taliban.

(1) And tonight, the United States of America makes the following demands on the Taliban: Deliver to United States authorities all the leaders of al Qaeda who hide in your land. …

(2) Our war on terror begins with al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been found, stopped and defeated. …

(3) Every nation, in every region, now has a decision to make. Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists. From this day forward, any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime.

In paragraph 3, Bush says that "any nation that continues to harbor or support terrorism will be regarded by the United States as a hostile regime." What does this statement mean?

Answer choices
Hint

Harbor means to give shelter or protection. Hostile means unfriendly, like an enemy.

Summary

  • On September 11, 2001, al Qaeda attacks killed nearly 3,000 people. Congress authorized force, and NATO invoked Article 5 for the first time.
  • The war on terror began in Afghanistan (2001). The Taliban fell, and bin Laden was killed in 2011. The U.S. withdrew in 2021 as the Taliban returned.
  • The main stated reason for the Iraq war (2003–2011) was a claimed WMD threat. No stockpiles were found.
  • At home, the PATRIOT Act, the TSA and the Department of Homeland Security reshaped security. They sparked debate over civil liberties.
  • Globalization tied the U.S. economy to the world. NATO grew to 32 members. It added Finland and Sweden after Russia's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
  • On the GED, separate claims from evidence and choose neutral, source-based answers.
Practice this skill →