This is an estimate based on your percent correct on our practice tests. The official GED score conversion is not public, so your real score may differ. Scores of 145+ pass; 165+ is College Ready.
Question 1 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
How State Governments Are Organized
(1) Every state has its own constitution and its own government. Like the national government, each state government has three branches. Voters in every state elect a governor, who heads the executive branch. The governor carries out state laws, proposes a budget and can veto bills. In most states, the governor also has a power the president does not have: the line-item veto. With it, a governor can reject one part of a spending bill, such as a single project, while signing the rest of the bill into law.
(2) Each state also has a legislature that writes state laws and approves the state budget. Forty-nine states have a two-house, or bicameral, legislature, like Congress. Nebraska is the only exception. Since 1937 it has had a single house, called a unicameral legislature, and its members run for office without party labels. In almost every state, the legislature can override a governor's veto with a supermajority vote, often two-thirds of the members of each house.
(3) State courts make up the judicial branch. They hear most of the criminal and civil cases in the United States, from traffic tickets to contract disputes. Each state has its own highest court, usually called the state supreme court. Federal judges are appointed for life, but many state judges are elected by voters or must win "retention" elections to keep their seats.
(4) States share responsibility with two other levels of government. The national government handles matters that affect the whole country, such as national defense and printing money. Counties, cities and towns are created by the state. They run local services such as police patrols, trash pickup and zoning, the rules that decide what may be built where. States themselves handle matters such as issuing driver's licenses, building state highways and setting rules for public schools.
According to paragraph 2, how is Nebraska's legislature different from the legislatures of the other 49 states?
Hint
Reread the sentences about Nebraska in paragraph 2. What does the word unicameral mean?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2 says that "Forty-nine states have a two-house, or bicameral, legislature" and that Nebraska "Since 1937 ... has had a single house, called a unicameral legislature."
Step by step:
The question asks what makes Nebraska different from the other 49 states.
The other 49 states have two houses. Nebraska has one. So the difference is the number of houses.
The passage never says Nebraska's legislature cannot override vetoes, is appointed by the governor, or does not approve the state budget. Those choices add details that are not in the text.
The correct answer is It has only one house instead of two.
Tip:Bi- means two (as in bicycle), and uni- means one (as in unicycle). Breaking a long word into parts often unlocks its meaning.
Question 2 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
How State Governments Are Organized
(1) Every state has its own constitution and its own government. Like the national government, each state government has three branches. Voters in every state elect a governor, who heads the executive branch. The governor carries out state laws, proposes a budget and can veto bills. In most states, the governor also has a power the president does not have: the line-item veto. With it, a governor can reject one part of a spending bill, such as a single project, while signing the rest of the bill into law.
(2) Each state also has a legislature that writes state laws and approves the state budget. Forty-nine states have a two-house, or bicameral, legislature, like Congress. Nebraska is the only exception. Since 1937 it has had a single house, called a unicameral legislature, and its members run for office without party labels. In almost every state, the legislature can override a governor's veto with a supermajority vote, often two-thirds of the members of each house.
(3) State courts make up the judicial branch. They hear most of the criminal and civil cases in the United States, from traffic tickets to contract disputes. Each state has its own highest court, usually called the state supreme court. Federal judges are appointed for life, but many state judges are elected by voters or must win "retention" elections to keep their seats.
(4) States share responsibility with two other levels of government. The national government handles matters that affect the whole country, such as national defense and printing money. Counties, cities and towns are created by the state. They run local services such as police patrols, trash pickup and zoning, the rules that decide what may be built where. States themselves handle matters such as issuing driver's licenses, building state highways and setting rules for public schools.
A governor uses the line-item veto to remove a $2 million park project from a budget bill and signs the rest of the bill. Based on the passage, what could the state legislature do if it still wants to fund the park project?
Hint
Paragraph 2 explains how a legislature can respond to a governor's veto.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1 explains that the line-item veto lets a governor "reject one part of a spending bill." Paragraph 2 says that "the legislature can override a governor's veto with a supermajority vote, often two-thirds of the members of each house."
Step by step:
The governor has used a veto, which is the executive branch checking the legislative branch.
The passage gives the legislature a way to check the governor in return: an override vote by a supermajority.
The president has nothing to do with a state budget, so asking the president is a mix-up between levels of government.
The passage does not say a veto is final, and it does not say that courts restore vetoed projects.
The correct answer is Vote to override the veto, which usually takes a supermajority such as two-thirds of each house. This back-and-forth is an example of checks and balances.
Tip: When a question describes one branch acting, look for how another branch can respond. That is the heart of checks and balances.
Question 3 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Drag and dropHow State Governments Are Organized
(1) Every state has its own constitution and its own government. Like the national government, each state government has three branches. Voters in every state elect a governor, who heads the executive branch. The governor carries out state laws, proposes a budget and can veto bills. In most states, the governor also has a power the president does not have: the line-item veto. With it, a governor can reject one part of a spending bill, such as a single project, while signing the rest of the bill into law.
(2) Each state also has a legislature that writes state laws and approves the state budget. Forty-nine states have a two-house, or bicameral, legislature, like Congress. Nebraska is the only exception. Since 1937 it has had a single house, called a unicameral legislature, and its members run for office without party labels. In almost every state, the legislature can override a governor's veto with a supermajority vote, often two-thirds of the members of each house.
(3) State courts make up the judicial branch. They hear most of the criminal and civil cases in the United States, from traffic tickets to contract disputes. Each state has its own highest court, usually called the state supreme court. Federal judges are appointed for life, but many state judges are elected by voters or must win "retention" elections to keep their seats.
(4) States share responsibility with two other levels of government. The national government handles matters that affect the whole country, such as national defense and printing money. Counties, cities and towns are created by the state. They run local services such as police patrols, trash pickup and zoning, the rules that decide what may be built where. States themselves handle matters such as issuing driver's licenses, building state highways and setting rules for public schools.
Paragraph 4 describes three levels of government. Drag each responsibility to the level of government that the passage says handles it.
National government
State government
Local government (county, city or town)
Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.
Hint
Paragraph 4 gives examples for each level. Match each tile to the example it is closest to.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 4 says the national government handles "national defense and printing money"; states handle "issuing driver's licenses, building state highways and setting rules for public schools"; and counties, cities and towns run "police patrols, trash pickup and zoning."
Step by step:
National:Printing money is named directly. Running the armed forces is how the country provides national defense.
State:Issuing driver's licenses and setting rules for public schools are both named as state jobs.
Local:Picking up trash is named as a local service. Deciding that a lot may hold only houses is an example of zoning, which the passage defines as "the rules that decide what may be built where."
So the national column gets money and the armed forces, the state column gets licenses and school rules, and the local column gets trash pickup and zoning.
Tip: A good rule of thumb: the closer a service is to your front door (trash, local police, zoning), the more likely it is handled by local government.
Question 4 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Hot spotTwo Forms of City Government
Most U.S. cities use one of two forms of government. The diagram compares two fictional cities. Arrows show who chooses whom.
In Lakeport, one official is hired by the city council rather than elected and runs the city's day-to-day operations. Click that official on the diagram.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Look only at the Lakeport side. Follow the arrow labeled "hires and can fire."
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the diagram: On the Lakeport side, voters elect the City Council. An arrow labeled "hires and can fire" runs from the City Council to the City Manager, who is described as a "professional administrator." The City Manager then hires the department heads.
Step by step:
Ignore Brennan City; the question is about Lakeport.
Lakeport's voters elect the council, so the council is not hired.
Department heads are hired too, but by the city manager, not by the council.
Only the City Manager is hired by the council.
Do not choose Brennan City's mayor: that mayor is elected and runs the executive branch, but the question asks about Lakeport.
The correct answer is the City Manager box on the Lakeport side.
Tip: In diagrams with arrows, read each arrow's label as a sentence: "The council hires and can fire the city manager."
Question 5 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments
Two Forms of City Government
Most U.S. cities use one of two forms of government. The diagram compares two fictional cities. Arrows show who chooses whom.
Lakeport's form of city government is most similar to which type of national government?
Hint
In Lakeport, who chooses the person who runs the executive side of government, and who can remove that person?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the diagram: In Lakeport, voters elect only the City Council. The council "hires and can fire" the City Manager, who runs the city's departments. In Brennan City, by contrast, voters elect the mayor separately from the council.
Step by step:
In a parliamentary system (as in the United Kingdom), voters elect the legislature, and the legislature's majority chooses the prime minister, who leads the executive. The legislature can also remove the prime minister.
Lakeport works the same way on a small scale: the elected council picks the manager and can remove the manager.
A presidential system elects the chief executive separately from the legislature. That describes Brennan City, not Lakeport.
An absolute monarchy has an unelected ruler with unlimited power, and a confederation is a loose union of independent states. Neither fits a city whose leaders answer to voters.
The correct answer is a parliamentary system, in which the elected legislature chooses the head of the executive branch and can remove that person.
Tip: To classify any government, ask: Who chooses the executive? Can that person be removed, and by whom?
Question 6 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
The Tenth Amendment (1791)
The Tenth Amendment was ratified in 1791 as the last of the ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights.
(1) "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Editor's note:
(2) The Constitution delegates, or assigns, certain powers to the national government, such as declaring war and regulating trade with other nations. Article I, Section 10 prohibits states from doing certain things, such as making treaties with foreign nations or coining money. Powers that fall into neither group are reserved to the states. States use these reserved powers, often called "police powers," to protect public health, safety and welfare. Examples include licensing workers such as nurses and electricians, setting traffic laws, and creating local governments and school districts.
The Tenth Amendment most directly supports which principle of American government?
Hint
The amendment talks about two levels of government. Which principle describes how power is divided between them?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1 says powers "not delegated to the United States" and not "prohibited ... to the States" are "reserved to the States." Paragraph 2 explains that some powers go to the national government and others stay with the states.
Step by step:
The amendment is about sorting power between the national government ("the United States") and the state governments.
Dividing power between national and state governments is called federalism.
Separation of powers divides power among the three branches (legislative, executive, judicial), not between levels of government.
Judicial review (courts striking down laws) and a veto (a president or governor rejecting a bill) are not mentioned in the amendment.
The correct answer is federalism: power is divided between the national government and the state governments.
Tip:Levels of government (national, state) point to federalism. Branches of government (Congress, president, courts) point to separation of powers.
Question 7 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Select allThe Tenth Amendment (1791)
The Tenth Amendment was ratified in 1791 as the last of the ten amendments known as the Bill of Rights.
(1) "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
Editor's note:
(2) The Constitution delegates, or assigns, certain powers to the national government, such as declaring war and regulating trade with other nations. Article I, Section 10 prohibits states from doing certain things, such as making treaties with foreign nations or coining money. Powers that fall into neither group are reserved to the states. States use these reserved powers, often called "police powers," to protect public health, safety and welfare. Examples include licensing workers such as nurses and electricians, setting traffic laws, and creating local governments and school districts.
Based on the Tenth Amendment and the editor's note, which actions could a state government take using its reserved powers? Select all that apply.
Select all that apply.
Hint
For each action, ask: Is it delegated to the national government? Is it prohibited to the states? If neither, it is reserved.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2 says states use reserved powers for "licensing workers such as nurses and electricians, setting traffic laws, and creating local governments and school districts." It also says states are prohibited from "making treaties with foreign nations or coining money," and that declaring war is delegated to the national government.
Step by step:
Requiring electricians to pass a test for a license matches "licensing workers." Reserved. ✔
Lowering the speed limit on state roads is a traffic law. Reserved. ✔
Creating a new school district is named directly. Reserved. ✔
Signing a trade treaty with Mexico is prohibited to the states by Article I, Section 10. ✘
Minting the state's own coins is "coining money," which is also prohibited. ✘
Declaring war is delegated to the national government. ✘
The correct answers are licensing electricians, lowering the speed limit and creating a school district.
Tip: In select-all questions, test each choice by itself against the source. Do not stop after finding one or two correct answers.
Question 8 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Drop-downLetting Voters Decide: Progressive Reforms in the States
(1) Around 1900, many Americans believed that their state legislatures had fallen under the control of party bosses and powerful businesses such as railroads. Reformers known as Progressives argued that voters needed ways to act directly when lawmakers would not.
(2) Three tools spread from state to state. The initiative lets citizens propose a new law or constitutional amendment by collecting a required number of voter signatures on a petition. The proposal then goes on the ballot, and voters accept or reject it. The referendum lets voters approve or reject a law that the legislature has already passed. In some states, citizens can force a referendum on a new law by petition. The recall lets voters remove an elected official before the official's term ends. It also begins with a petition and ends with a special vote.
(3) South Dakota adopted the initiative and referendum in 1898, and Oregon adopted both in 1902. Within two decades, many western states had followed. Today about half of the states allow citizens to place laws or amendments on the ballot by initiative. In every state except Delaware, changes to the state constitution must also be approved by voters.
(4) Supporters say these tools keep government accountable to the people. Critics argue that complicated questions can be hard to judge from a short ballot summary. They also point out that well-funded groups can pay workers to gather signatures, giving organized interests a new path to power.
In the fictional state of Westvale, citizens are using the tools described in the passage. Choose the tool that each situation describes.
Citizens collect 90,000 signatures to place a brand-new law, which would raise the state minimum wage, on the ballot. This is an example of the .
After the legislature passes a law raising the gas tax, citizens collect signatures so that voters can decide whether to keep or reject that law. This is an example of the .
Citizens collect signatures to hold a special election on removing a county sheriff before the end of her term. This is an example of the .
Choose an answer from each menu.
Hint
For each situation, ask: Is it a new law from citizens, a vote on a law the legislature already passed, or removing a person from office?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2 defines each tool. The initiative lets citizens "propose a new law." The referendum lets voters "approve or reject a law that the legislature has already passed." The recall lets voters "remove an elected official before the official's term ends."
Step by step:
Minimum wage petition: The law is brand-new and comes from citizens. That is an initiative.
Gas tax petition: The legislature already passed the law; voters will decide whether to keep it. That is a referendum.
Sheriff petition: The goal is to remove a person from office early. That is a recall.
Notice that all three tools begin with a petition, so the petition itself does not tell you which tool is being used. The key is what voters will decide: a new law, an existing law or an official.
The answers are initiative, referendum and recall.
Tip: Memory aid: you initiate something new, you refer an existing law back to the voters, and you recall (call back) an official.
Question 9 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
Letting Voters Decide: Progressive Reforms in the States
(1) Around 1900, many Americans believed that their state legislatures had fallen under the control of party bosses and powerful businesses such as railroads. Reformers known as Progressives argued that voters needed ways to act directly when lawmakers would not.
(2) Three tools spread from state to state. The initiative lets citizens propose a new law or constitutional amendment by collecting a required number of voter signatures on a petition. The proposal then goes on the ballot, and voters accept or reject it. The referendum lets voters approve or reject a law that the legislature has already passed. In some states, citizens can force a referendum on a new law by petition. The recall lets voters remove an elected official before the official's term ends. It also begins with a petition and ends with a special vote.
(3) South Dakota adopted the initiative and referendum in 1898, and Oregon adopted both in 1902. Within two decades, many western states had followed. Today about half of the states allow citizens to place laws or amendments on the ballot by initiative. In every state except Delaware, changes to the state constitution must also be approved by voters.
(4) Supporters say these tools keep government accountable to the people. Critics argue that complicated questions can be hard to judge from a short ballot summary. They also point out that well-funded groups can pay workers to gather signatures, giving organized interests a new path to power.
The initiative, referendum and recall most directly reflect which principle of American government?
Hint
Think about who gains power through these tools, according to paragraphs 1 and 4.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1 says Progressives believed "voters needed ways to act directly when lawmakers would not." Paragraph 4 says supporters believe the tools "keep government accountable to the people."
Step by step:
All three tools let ordinary voters, rather than officials, make decisions: proposing laws, rejecting laws and removing officials.
The principle that government's power comes from the people, and that the people hold final authority, is popular sovereignty.
Federalism (power split between nation and states) is not the point. The tools are about who decides within a state.
Separation of powers divides power among branches of government, and judicial review gives power to courts. The tools give power to voters instead.
The correct answer is popular sovereignty: the people are the source of government's power.
Tip: If a reform shifts power to voters (elections, petitions, ballot measures), think popular sovereignty.
Question 10 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Letting Voters Decide: Progressive Reforms in the States
(1) Around 1900, many Americans believed that their state legislatures had fallen under the control of party bosses and powerful businesses such as railroads. Reformers known as Progressives argued that voters needed ways to act directly when lawmakers would not.
(2) Three tools spread from state to state. The initiative lets citizens propose a new law or constitutional amendment by collecting a required number of voter signatures on a petition. The proposal then goes on the ballot, and voters accept or reject it. The referendum lets voters approve or reject a law that the legislature has already passed. In some states, citizens can force a referendum on a new law by petition. The recall lets voters remove an elected official before the official's term ends. It also begins with a petition and ends with a special vote.
(3) South Dakota adopted the initiative and referendum in 1898, and Oregon adopted both in 1902. Within two decades, many western states had followed. Today about half of the states allow citizens to place laws or amendments on the ballot by initiative. In every state except Delaware, changes to the state constitution must also be approved by voters.
(4) Supporters say these tools keep government accountable to the people. Critics argue that complicated questions can be hard to judge from a short ballot summary. They also point out that well-funded groups can pay workers to gather signatures, giving organized interests a new path to power.
Which development would a critic of the initiative, as described in paragraph 4, most likely use as evidence to support the critic's concerns?
Hint
Paragraph 4 gives two concerns of critics. Find the choice that is an example of one of them.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 4 says critics worry that "complicated questions can be hard to judge from a short ballot summary" and that "well-funded groups can pay workers to gather signatures, giving organized interests a new path to power."
Step by step:
A business group spending millions on paid signature gatherers for a measure that would cut its own taxes is a direct example of an organized interest using money to reach the ballot. This supports the critics.
Higher voter turnout and a corrupt mayor being removed would be evidence for the supporters, who say the tools keep government "accountable to the people."
A legislature holding public hearings is about the normal lawmaking process, not about the initiative at all.
The correct answer is A business group spends $5 million on paid workers to collect signatures for a measure that would lower its own taxes.
Tip: In evidence questions, first restate the claim in your own words. Then pick the choice that would make the claim more believable, not one that is merely about the same topic.
Question 11 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
Fill inWhere a County Gets Its Money
Harlan County is a fictional county. Counties pay for services such as sheriffs, jails, courts, road repair and public health from a general fund. The chart shows where the money in Harlan County's general fund came from in 2025. "State aid" is money the state government gives the county; "federal grants" come from the national government.
What percent of Harlan County's total general fund revenue in 2025 came from property taxes?
%
Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.
Hint
Divide the property tax amount by the total revenue, then change the decimal to a percent.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the chart: Property taxes = $54 million. Total revenue = $120 million (stated in the chart's subtitle; you can check it: 54 + 30 + 18 + 12 + 6 = 120).
Step by step:
Part ÷ whole: 54 ÷ 120 = 0.45.
Change the decimal to a percent by multiplying by 100: 0.45 × 100 = 45.
Check: 45% of 120 is 0.45 × 120 = 54. ✔
Common errors: dividing 54 by 60 (the top of the axis) gives 90; dividing 120 by 54 gives about 2.2; and comparing property taxes only with state aid (54 ÷ 84) gives about 64.
Property taxes made up 45% of the county's general fund revenue.
Tip: "What percent of the total" always means part ÷ whole × 100. Make sure the whole is the total, not the largest number on the axis.
Question 12 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
Where a County Gets Its Money
Harlan County is a fictional county. Counties pay for services such as sheriffs, jails, courts, road repair and public health from a general fund. The chart shows where the money in Harlan County's general fund came from in 2025. "State aid" is money the state government gives the county; "federal grants" come from the national government.
Which conclusion is supported by the data in the chart?
Hint
Test each choice with the numbers. Add bars together when a choice combines sources.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the chart: Property taxes $54M; state aid $30M; sales taxes $18M; fees and charges $12M; federal grants $6M; total $120M.
Step by step:
Property taxes vs. state aid + sales taxes: 30 + 18 = 48, and 54 > 48. Supported. ✔
More than half from state and federal governments? 30 + 6 = 36, and 36 ÷ 120 = 30%. That is less than half. ✘
Sales taxes second-largest? State aid ($30M) is larger than sales taxes ($18M), so sales taxes rank third. ✘
Fees twice as large as state aid? It is the reverse: state aid ($30M) is more than twice fees ($12M). ✘
The correct answer is Property taxes brought in more money than state aid and sales taxes combined.
Tip: For "which conclusion is supported" questions with data, do the quick math for every choice. A choice that sounds reasonable can still be false by the numbers.
Question 13 of 35 · Key historical documents
Two Progressive Era Amendments
During the Progressive Era, Americans amended the Constitution four times between 1913 and 1920. Two of those amendments appear below.
(1) Sixteenth Amendment (ratified 1913): "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
(2) Nineteenth Amendment (ratified 1920): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
Editor's note:
(3) In 1895, in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., the Supreme Court ruled that a federal tax on income from property was a direct tax. Under the original Constitution, direct taxes had to be apportioned, or divided among the states according to population. That rule made a national income tax nearly impossible to collect fairly. Before 1920, about fifteen states, most of them in the West, already allowed women to vote in all elections, but many other states did not.
What was the main effect of the Sixteenth Amendment?
Hint
Read the amendment together with the editor's note about the 1895 court case. What problem did the amendment solve?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1 says Congress may "lay and collect taxes on incomes ... without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census." Paragraph 3 explains that the old rule required direct taxes to be "divided among the states according to population," which "made a national income tax nearly impossible."
Step by step:
Before 1913, an income tax had to be split among states by population, which did not work.
The Sixteenth Amendment removed that requirement ("without apportionment").
So Congress could now tax incomes directly, no matter how population was spread among the states.
The amendment gives power to Congress, not to the states, and it says the tax is collected "without regard to any census," the opposite of requiring one.
The correct answer is It allowed Congress to tax incomes without dividing the tax among the states by population.
Tip: Short constitutional texts often turn on one key phrase. Here it is "without apportionment." Look for words like without, not and except that change a rule.
Question 14 of 35 · Civil rights
Two Progressive Era Amendments
During the Progressive Era, Americans amended the Constitution four times between 1913 and 1920. Two of those amendments appear below.
(1) Sixteenth Amendment (ratified 1913): "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
(2) Nineteenth Amendment (ratified 1920): "The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.
Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
Editor's note:
(3) In 1895, in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., the Supreme Court ruled that a federal tax on income from property was a direct tax. Under the original Constitution, direct taxes had to be apportioned, or divided among the states according to population. That rule made a national income tax nearly impossible to collect fairly. Before 1920, about fifteen states, most of them in the West, already allowed women to vote in all elections, but many other states did not.
Based on the excerpt and the editor's note, which statement about the Nineteenth Amendment is accurate?
Hint
Notice which governments the amendment names, and what the editor's note says about voting before 1920.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2 says the right to vote "shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex." Paragraph 3 says that before 1920 "about fifteen states ... already allowed women to vote in all elections, but many other states did not."
Step by step:
The amendment names both "the United States" and "any State," so it limits the national government and every state government.
Because some states had not let women vote, the amendment extended voting rights to women in those states.
It was not the first time any woman could vote: the note says about fifteen states already allowed it.
It did not leave the question to each state; it took that choice away from the states.
The correct answer is It barred both the national and state governments from denying the vote based on sex, extending voting rights to women in states that had not allowed them to vote.
Tip: When a passage includes a note with background facts, use it. GED questions often require combining the document with the note.
Question 15 of 35 · Key historical documents
Hot spotThe Progressive Era, 1890–1920
Between about 1890 and 1920, reformers called Progressives worked to limit the power of big business, protect workers and consumers, and give voters more control over government. The timeline shows key events of the period.
A historian writes: "One event on this timeline was not a law at all. It was a workplace disaster, and afterward New York passed dozens of new factory safety laws." Click the event the historian is describing.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Look for an event that describes something that happened to workers, not something Congress or the states passed.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the timeline: "1911: Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire kills 146 garment workers in New York City."
Step by step:
The historian gives three clues: (a) the event was not a law, (b) it was a workplace disaster and (c) it happened in New York.
Most entries begin "Congress passes" or name an amendment, so they are laws or amendments. Rule them out.
The entries about World War I are not laws, but they are not workplace disasters, and they did not happen in New York.
Only the 1911 Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire matches all three clues. Many of the workers who died were young immigrant women who could not escape because exit doors were locked, and the fire led to new safety laws.
The correct answer is 1911: Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire.
Tip: When a question gives several clues, use each one to eliminate choices. The right answer must match every clue.
Question 16 of 35 · World War I and World War II
The Progressive Era, 1890–1920
Between about 1890 and 1920, reformers called Progressives worked to limit the power of big business, protect workers and consumers, and give voters more control over government. The timeline shows key events of the period.
During World War I, many women took factory jobs and volunteered for war work. Suffrage leaders argued that this service proved women deserved the right to vote. Based on the timeline, which reform could this argument have most directly helped bring about?
Hint
An argument based on wartime service can only influence events that came after the war began. Check the dates.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the timeline: The United States entered World War I in 1917, and the war ended in 1918. The Nineteenth Amendment, protecting women's right to vote, was ratified in 1920.
Step by step:
The argument depends on women's service during the war, so it could only affect events from 1917 on.
The Sixteenth Amendment (1913), the Seventeenth Amendment (1913), the Clayton Antitrust Act (1914) and the Keating–Owen Child Labor Act (1916) all came before the United States entered the war. A wartime argument could not have caused them.
The Nineteenth Amendment came two years after the war ended, and it is about women voting, which matches the argument.
The correct answer is the Nineteenth Amendment (1920).
Tip: A cause must come before its effect. In timeline questions, use dates to rule out anything that happened before the cause.
Question 17 of 35 · Key historical documents
Theodore Roosevelt on the Trusts (1901)
President Theodore Roosevelt sent this message to Congress in December 1901, a few months after taking office. A trust was a large combination of companies that worked together to control a market, such as oil or railroads.
(1) "The tremendous and highly complex industrial development which went on with ever accelerated rapidity during the latter half of the nineteenth century brings us face to face, at the beginning of the twentieth, with very serious social problems. The old laws, and the old customs which had almost the binding force of law, were once quite sufficient to regulate the accumulation and distribution of wealth. Since the industrial changes which have so enormously increased the productive power of mankind, they are no longer sufficient."
(2) "There is a widespread conviction in the minds of the American people that the great corporations known as trusts are in certain of their features and tendencies hurtful to the general welfare. … It is based upon sincere conviction that combination and concentration should be, not prohibited, but supervised and within reasonable limits controlled; and in my judgment this conviction is right."
(3) "Great corporations exist only because they are created and safeguarded by our institutions; and it is therefore our right and our duty to see that they work in harmony with these institutions. … The first essential in determining how to deal with the great industrial combinations is knowledge of the facts--publicity."
Which statement best summarizes Roosevelt's position on the trusts in this excerpt?
Hint
Paragraph 2 contains the phrase "not prohibited, but ..." What comes after but?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2: "combination and concentration should be, not prohibited, but supervised and within reasonable limits controlled; and in my judgment this conviction is right." Paragraph 3: it is "our right and our duty to see that they work in harmony with these institutions," and the first step is "knowledge of the facts--publicity."
He also rejects leaving them alone: he says they should be "supervised" and "controlled," and that the government has a "duty" to make sure they act properly.
Paragraph 1 says the old laws are "no longer sufficient," so he does not think existing laws are enough.
Putting it together: the government should oversee and regulate big business, starting by making the facts public.
The correct answer is The government should supervise and regulate large corporations rather than ban them or leave them alone.
Tip: In primary sources, watch for contrast words (not ... but, however, yet). The idea after the contrast word is usually the author's real position.
Question 18 of 35 · Scientific and industrial revolutions
Factories and Cities, 1870–1920
(1) In the decades after the Civil War, the United States became the world's leading industrial nation. New machines and new sources of power, first steam engines and later electricity, allowed factories to produce goods in huge quantities. Railroads carried coal and iron ore to factories and carried finished goods to customers across the country.
(2) Factories were usually built where workers, transportation and customers came together: in cities. At the same time, new farm machinery meant that fewer people were needed to grow the nation's food. Millions of young people left farms and small towns for jobs in cities. Millions of immigrants, many from southern and eastern Europe after 1890, also settled in cities such as New York, Chicago and Pittsburgh.
(3) Cities grew faster than they could provide services. Many working families crowded into tenements, apartment buildings with little light or fresh air. Factory smoke darkened the sky, and waste was dumped into rivers that also supplied drinking water. These conditions led reformers to push for building codes, clean water systems and public health departments.
(4) The graph shows the percent of Americans who lived in urban areas, which the U.S. Census defined as places with 2,500 or more people.
Which sequence best shows the chain of causes and effects described in the passage?
Hint
Find the order of events in paragraphs 2 and 3. Which came first, and what did it lead to?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2: factories "were usually built ... in cities," and "Millions of young people left farms ... for jobs in cities." Paragraph 3: "Cities grew faster than they could provide services. Many working families crowded into tenements ... These conditions led reformers to push for building codes, clean water systems and public health departments."
Step by step:
Cause 1: Factories are built in cities.
Effect 1, which becomes cause 2: People move to cities for factory jobs.
Effect 2: Cities grow faster than services, so housing is crowded and water is polluted.
Effect 3: Reformers push for building codes and clean water systems.
The other choices put reforms first, invent events the passage does not describe (such as immigration ending), or reverse cause and effect.
The correct answer is Factories open in cities → workers move to cities → crowded, unhealthy housing → reformers push for building codes.
Tip: Signal words such as led to, because, as a result and at the same time mark cause-and-effect links. Use them to build the chain in order.
Question 19 of 35 · Human migration
Factories and Cities, 1870–1920
(1) In the decades after the Civil War, the United States became the world's leading industrial nation. New machines and new sources of power, first steam engines and later electricity, allowed factories to produce goods in huge quantities. Railroads carried coal and iron ore to factories and carried finished goods to customers across the country.
(2) Factories were usually built where workers, transportation and customers came together: in cities. At the same time, new farm machinery meant that fewer people were needed to grow the nation's food. Millions of young people left farms and small towns for jobs in cities. Millions of immigrants, many from southern and eastern Europe after 1890, also settled in cities such as New York, Chicago and Pittsburgh.
(3) Cities grew faster than they could provide services. Many working families crowded into tenements, apartment buildings with little light or fresh air. Factory smoke darkened the sky, and waste was dumped into rivers that also supplied drinking water. These conditions led reformers to push for building codes, clean water systems and public health departments.
(4) The graph shows the percent of Americans who lived in urban areas, which the U.S. Census defined as places with 2,500 or more people.
According to the graph, in which census year did more than half of Americans live in urban areas for the first time?
Hint
Find the dashed 50% line. Which is the first point above it?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the graph: 1870, 26%; 1880, 28%; 1890, 35%; 1900, 40%; 1910, 46%; 1920, 51%. A dashed line marks 50%.
Step by step:
"More than half" means more than 50%.
Check each point: 26%, 28%, 35%, 40% and 46% are all below 50%.
The 1920 value, 51%, is the first one above 50%.
1910 is close (46%) but still below half. 1890 is the year of the biggest single jump (from 28% to 35%), but a big jump does not mean a majority.
The correct answer is 1920. This shift from a mostly rural to a mostly urban nation was driven by the rural-to-urban migration and immigration described in paragraph 2.
Tip: On line graphs, a reference line (like the 50% line) is there for a reason. Compare each point to it carefully.
Question 20 of 35 · Microeconomics
Wages for Warehouse Workers
Dalton County is a fictional county. Wages, like other prices, are set by supply and demand. Workers supply labor, and employers demand it. In 2025, an online retailer opened a large new distribution center in Dalton County. The graph shows the market for warehouse workers before the center opened (D1) and after it opened (D2). E1 and E2 mark the equilibrium wage and number of workers before and after.
Based on the graph, how did the opening of the distribution center affect the market for warehouse workers in Dalton County?
Hint
Which line moved: supply or demand? Then compare point E1 with point E2.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the graph: The supply line S did not move. The demand line shifted from D1 to D2 (to the right). E1 = 2,000 workers at $18 per hour. E2 = 2,400 workers at $20 per hour.
Step by step:
A new employer that needs workers increases the demand for labor, so the demand line shifts right.
Compare the equilibrium points: the wage rose from $18 to $20, and the number of workers rose from 2,000 to 2,400.
Supply did not change, so any choice saying supply increased misreads the graph.
$22 is not an equilibrium on the graph. It is just a gridline above E2.
The correct answer is Demand for workers increased, so the wage rose from $18 to $20 per hour and employment rose from 2,000 to 2,400 workers.
Tip: On supply-and-demand graphs, first identify which curve shifted. Then read the old and new equilibrium points from the axes.
Question 21 of 35 · Fundamental economic concepts
Drop-downWages for Warehouse Workers
Dalton County is a fictional county. Wages, like other prices, are set by supply and demand. Workers supply labor, and employers demand it. In 2025, an online retailer opened a large new distribution center in Dalton County. The graph shows the market for warehouse workers before the center opened (D1) and after it opened (D2). E1 and E2 mark the equilibrium wage and number of workers before and after.
Suppose that before the distribution center opened (use S and D1 only), the county had set a minimum wage of $22 per hour for warehouse work. Use the graph to complete the sentences.
At $22 per hour, employers would want to hire about workers.
At $22 per hour, about people would want warehouse jobs.
As a result, the minimum wage would create .
Choose an answer from each menu.
Hint
Find $22 on the vertical axis. Move across to D1 (employers) and to S (workers), and read the number of workers below each crossing.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the graph: At a wage of $22, the demand line D1 is at 1,200 workers and the supply line S is at 2,800 workers. The equilibrium without a minimum wage is E1: $18 and 2,000 workers.
Step by step:
Demand (employers): Follow the $22 gridline to D1. It crosses at 1,200 workers. At a higher wage, employers hire fewer people.
Supply (workers): Follow the same line to S. It crosses at 2,800 workers. At a higher wage, more people want the job.
2,800 job seekers − 1,200 jobs = 1,600 people who want work but cannot find it. When the amount supplied is greater than the amount demanded, there is a surplus. In the labor market, a surplus of workers means unemployment.
A minimum wage set above equilibrium is called a price floor. Because the law stops the wage from falling to $18, the surplus does not go away by itself.
The answers are 1,200, 2,800 and a surplus of workers who want jobs but cannot find them.
Tip: On any supply-and-demand graph, a price set above equilibrium creates a surplus; a price set below equilibrium creates a shortage. Economists debate how large these effects are in real labor markets, but the GED expects you to read the model correctly.
Question 22 of 35 · Key economic events in U.S. history
Franklin D. Roosevelt on Wages and Hours (1937)
In May 1937, during the Great Depression, President Franklin D. Roosevelt asked Congress to pass a law setting national minimum wages and maximum working hours. Congress passed the Fair Labor Standards Act the next year. It set the first national minimum wage, 25 cents an hour, limited the workweek and banned most child labor in industries that shipped goods across state lines.
(1) "One-third of our population, the overwhelming majority of which is in agriculture or industry, is ill-nourished, ill-clad and ill-housed."
(2) "Our Nation so richly endowed with natural resources and with a capable and industrious population should be able to devise ways and means of insuring to all our able-bodied working men and women a fair day's pay for a fair day's work. A self-supporting and self-respecting democracy can plead no justification for the existence of child labor, no economic reason for chiseling workers' wages or stretching workers' hours."
(3) "Goods produced under conditions which do not meet rudimentary standards of decency should be regarded as contraband and ought not to be allowed to pollute the channels of interstate trade."
In paragraph 3, why does Roosevelt say that goods made under indecent working conditions should be treated as "contraband" and kept out of "the channels of interstate trade"?
Hint
Contraband means goods that are not allowed to be traded. Interstate means between states. Why would that matter for a national law?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3: "Goods produced under conditions which do not meet rudimentary standards of decency should be regarded as contraband and ought not to be allowed to pollute the channels of interstate trade." The introduction says the 1938 law applied to "industries that shipped goods across state lines."
Step by step:
Contraband means goods that may not legally be traded.
Roosevelt wants to block goods made with child labor or unfair wages and hours from being sold from one state to another.
The Constitution gives Congress the power to regulate commerce among the states. By tying labor standards to interstate trade, Roosevelt offers a way for a national law to enforce fair wages and hours.
He is not proposing to stop all trade between states, and he says nothing in this excerpt about foreign imports or about leaving the matter to the states.
The correct answer is He wanted to use Congress's control over trade between states as a way to enforce national labor standards.
Tip: When a historical document uses a striking word (contraband, pollute), ask what action the author wants and what power would make it possible.
Question 23 of 35 · Microeconomics
Hot spotEducation and Earnings
The Corvel metro area is a fictional region. The chart shows the median (middle) weekly earnings of full-time workers in 2025, grouped by the highest level of education each worker completed. A GED credential counts as a high school diploma.
Click the bar for the group whose median weekly earnings were $200 more than those of workers with less than a high school education.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Start with the bar for less than high school. Add $200 to it, then find the bar with that value.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the chart: Less than high school = $690. High school diploma or GED = $890. Some college = $990. Associate degree = $1,060. Bachelor's degree = $1,500. Advanced degree = $1,850.
Step by step:
Start with $690, the median for workers with less than a high school education.
Add $200: 690 + 200 = 890.
The bar labeled $890 is "High school diploma or GED."
Some college ($990) is $300 more, not $200. Associate degree ($1,060) is $370 more.
Over a year, $200 a week adds up to about 200 × 52 = $10,400.
The correct answer is the High school diploma or GED bar ($890).
Tip: On bar graphs with printed values, use the labels instead of estimating from bar heights.
Question 24 of 35 · Environment and societal development
Hot spotThe Urban Heat Island
(1) On a sunny summer afternoon, the surfaces of a city can be much hotter than the countryside around it. Scientists call this an urban heat island. Dark surfaces such as asphalt streets, parking lots and tar roofs absorb sunlight and release the heat slowly. Buildings block breezes that would carry heat away. Trees and other plants help cool an area in two ways: they shade the ground, and they release water vapor through their leaves, which cools the air around them. Water also stays cooler than pavement during the day.
(2) Scientists in the fictional city of Marston measured surface temperatures in six zones at 3 p.m. on a clear day in July. The map shows their results.
Click the built-up zone (a zone with homes, businesses or factories) that had the lowest surface temperature.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
First decide which zones are built up. Farmland and a park are not. Then compare only the built-up zones.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the map: Farmland 89°F; Industrial district 101°F; Downtown 104°F; New suburb 97°F; Riverside Park 86°F; Older neighborhood 92°F.
Step by step:
Built-up zones contain homes, businesses or factories: Industrial district, Downtown, New suburb and Older neighborhood.
Farmland (crops and pasture) and Riverside Park (grass and trees) are not built up, even though they are the coolest zones on the map.
Compare the four built-up zones: 92 < 97 < 101 < 104.
The Older neighborhood, at 92°F, is the coolest built-up zone. Its label says it has "many large shade trees."
The correct answer is the Older neighborhood (92°F).
Tip: Read every condition in the question. Here the word built-up rules out the two coolest zones on the map.
Question 25 of 35 · Environment and societal development
The Urban Heat Island
(1) On a sunny summer afternoon, the surfaces of a city can be much hotter than the countryside around it. Scientists call this an urban heat island. Dark surfaces such as asphalt streets, parking lots and tar roofs absorb sunlight and release the heat slowly. Buildings block breezes that would carry heat away. Trees and other plants help cool an area in two ways: they shade the ground, and they release water vapor through their leaves, which cools the air around them. Water also stays cooler than pavement during the day.
(2) Scientists in the fictional city of Marston measured surface temperatures in six zones at 3 p.m. on a clear day in July. The map shows their results.
Which conclusion is best supported by the passage and the map?
Hint
Watch for absolute words like always and every. Then look for a choice that compares two similar zones that differ in one main way.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1 says trees cool an area by providing shade and releasing water vapor. On the map, the New suburb ("houses, wide streets, few trees") is 97°F, while the Older neighborhood ("houses, many large shade trees") is 92°F.
Step by step:
Choice about tree cover: Both zones are residential, but one has few trees and the other has many. The 5-degree difference matches the passage's explanation of how trees cool. Supported. ✔
"Zones farther from downtown are always cooler": The New suburb, at the far southwest corner, is 97°F, hotter than the Older neighborhood (92°F) right next to downtown. One counterexample breaks always. ✘
"Farmland is cooler than every zone in the city": Riverside Park (86°F) is cooler than the farmland (89°F). ✘
"The industrial district was the hottest zone": Downtown (104°F) was hotter than the industrial district (101°F). ✘
The correct answer is The temperature difference between the New suburb and the Older neighborhood is likely due largely to differences in tree cover.
Tip: The strongest conclusions compare cases that are alike except for one factor. Absolute statements fail if you can find even one exception.
Question 26 of 35 · Environment and societal development
The River That Caught Fire
(1) On June 22, 1969, oil-soaked debris floating on the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio, caught fire. Firefighters put out the blaze quickly, and it caused fairly little damage. It was not even the river's first fire. The Cuyahoga had burned several times since the late 1800s, including a far more destructive fire in 1952.
(2) For about a century, steel mills, oil refineries and other factories along the river had dumped their wastes into it, and the growing city had poured in sewage. In parts of the river, almost no fish could survive. National magazine coverage later that summer made the burning river a symbol of industrial pollution. The image helped build public support for stronger national pollution laws.
(3) In 1970, the federal government created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In 1972, Congress passed major changes to the federal water pollution law, now known as the Clean Water Act. The law required a permit for anyone discharging pollution from a pipe or other single "point source" into the nation's waters, and it set a goal of making waters safe for fishing and swimming. Congress passed the law over President Richard Nixon's veto.
(4) Today the Cuyahoga is much cleaner, and dozens of kinds of fish live in stretches where few could survive in 1969. Problems remain, however. When it rains, runoff from streets, lawns and parking lots carries oil, salt, fertilizer and trash into rivers. Because this pollution comes from thousands of scattered places rather than one pipe, it is much harder to regulate.
According to paragraph 4, why is polluted runoff from streets and parking lots harder to control than pollution from a factory pipe?
Hint
Compare where each kind of pollution comes from. Paragraph 3 explains how the law handles a "point source."
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 4: "Because this pollution comes from thousands of scattered places rather than one pipe, it is much harder to regulate." Paragraph 3 explains that the Clean Water Act requires permits for discharges from "a pipe or other single 'point source.'"
Step by step:
A factory pipe is one location. Regulators can issue a permit for it, test what comes out and hold one owner responsible.
Runoff flows from thousands of streets, lawns and parking lots, so there is no single place to permit or test.
The passage does not say runoff is more toxic, that it is legal, or that it happens only in dry weather (in fact it happens "when it rains").
The correct answer is It comes from many scattered sources instead of a single location.
Tip: When a question asks why according to a paragraph, look for a signal word such as because in that paragraph. The answer is usually right after it.
Question 27 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
The River That Caught Fire
(1) On June 22, 1969, oil-soaked debris floating on the Cuyahoga River in Cleveland, Ohio, caught fire. Firefighters put out the blaze quickly, and it caused fairly little damage. It was not even the river's first fire. The Cuyahoga had burned several times since the late 1800s, including a far more destructive fire in 1952.
(2) For about a century, steel mills, oil refineries and other factories along the river had dumped their wastes into it, and the growing city had poured in sewage. In parts of the river, almost no fish could survive. National magazine coverage later that summer made the burning river a symbol of industrial pollution. The image helped build public support for stronger national pollution laws.
(3) In 1970, the federal government created the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). In 1972, Congress passed major changes to the federal water pollution law, now known as the Clean Water Act. The law required a permit for anyone discharging pollution from a pipe or other single "point source" into the nation's waters, and it set a goal of making waters safe for fishing and swimming. Congress passed the law over President Richard Nixon's veto.
(4) Today the Cuyahoga is much cleaner, and dozens of kinds of fish live in stretches where few could survive in 1969. Problems remain, however. When it rains, runoff from streets, lawns and parking lots carries oil, salt, fertilizer and trash into rivers. Because this pollution comes from thousands of scattered places rather than one pipe, it is much harder to regulate.
Based on the passage, which statement best describes the relationship between the 1969 Cuyahoga River fire and the Clean Water Act?
Hint
Paragraph 1 says the fire itself was small. Paragraph 2 explains why it mattered anyway.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1: the 1969 fire "caused fairly little damage" and "was not even the river's first fire." Paragraph 2: national coverage "made the burning river a symbol of industrial pollution" and "helped build public support for stronger national pollution laws." Paragraph 3: Congress passed the Clean Water Act in 1972.
Step by step:
The fire's importance came from the attention it drew, not from its size.
That attention helped build support for national laws, and the Clean Water Act followed three years later.
The fire was not the first or the most destructive (the 1952 fire was worse), so choices based on those ideas contradict paragraph 1.
The law required permits for point sources like pipes. Paragraph 4 says street runoff is still hard to regulate, so the law did not solve runoff.
The correct answer is The fire drew national attention to water pollution, which helped build support for federal laws such as the Clean Water Act.
Tip: Public policy questions often ask how an event led to a law. Look for the link: an event creates public attention, attention creates pressure, pressure leads to action.
Question 28 of 35 · Human migration
Drag and dropThe Great Migration Begins
(1) Between about 1910 and 1970, roughly six million African Americans left the rural South for cities in the North, Midwest and West. Historians call this movement the Great Migration. The first large wave came during World War I.
(2) In the South, most Black families worked as sharecroppers or farm laborers, often for very low pay and trapped in debt. State and local "Jim Crow" laws enforced racial segregation, and poll taxes and literacy tests kept most Black men from voting. Lynching and other violence threatened Black communities. In the 1910s, an insect called the boll weevil spread across the cotton-growing South and destroyed crops, wiping out many farm jobs.
(3) In the North, the war created new opportunities. Factories were producing weapons, ships and supplies, and the war had nearly cut off immigration from Europe, which had supplied much of industry's labor. Some employers sent recruiters south. Black-owned newspapers, especially the Chicago Defender, printed job listings and letters from migrants describing better pay and schools. Factory jobs in cities such as Chicago, Detroit and Pittsburgh often paid far more than farm work in the South.
(4) Life in the North was not free of discrimination. Migrants often faced segregated housing, unfair hiring and, in 1919, deadly riots in Chicago and other cities. Still, the migration reshaped American cities, politics and culture.
Geographers describe migration in terms of push factors (conditions that drive people away from a place) and pull factors (conditions that attract people to a new place). Drag each factor from the passage into the correct category for African Americans who left the South.
Push factors (the South)
Pull factors (Northern cities)
Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.
Hint
Ask of each factor: Is it a problem in the place people left, or an opportunity in the place they went?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2 describes conditions in the South: "Jim Crow" laws, "Lynching and other violence" and the boll weevil, which "destroyed crops, wiping out many farm jobs." Paragraph 3 describes the North: factories producing for the war, employers recruiting, the Chicago Defender printing "job listings and letters," and factory jobs that "often paid far more."
Step by step:
Push factors are bad conditions at home: the boll weevil (lost farm jobs), Jim Crow segregation laws and the threat of violence.
Pull factors are attractions in the destination: wartime factory jobs, higher industrial wages and the job listings and encouraging letters in the Chicago Defender.
The Chicago Defender was a newspaper, but it belongs with pull factors because it spread news of opportunities in the North.
Tip: Push = "Why leave?" Pull = "Why go there?" Many migrations, from the Great Migration to modern movements, are explained by both at once.
Question 29 of 35 · World War I and World War II
The Great Migration Begins
(1) Between about 1910 and 1970, roughly six million African Americans left the rural South for cities in the North, Midwest and West. Historians call this movement the Great Migration. The first large wave came during World War I.
(2) In the South, most Black families worked as sharecroppers or farm laborers, often for very low pay and trapped in debt. State and local "Jim Crow" laws enforced racial segregation, and poll taxes and literacy tests kept most Black men from voting. Lynching and other violence threatened Black communities. In the 1910s, an insect called the boll weevil spread across the cotton-growing South and destroyed crops, wiping out many farm jobs.
(3) In the North, the war created new opportunities. Factories were producing weapons, ships and supplies, and the war had nearly cut off immigration from Europe, which had supplied much of industry's labor. Some employers sent recruiters south. Black-owned newspapers, especially the Chicago Defender, printed job listings and letters from migrants describing better pay and schools. Factory jobs in cities such as Chicago, Detroit and Pittsburgh often paid far more than farm work in the South.
(4) Life in the North was not free of discrimination. Migrants often faced segregated housing, unfair hiring and, in 1919, deadly riots in Chicago and other cities. Still, the migration reshaped American cities, politics and culture.
According to the passage, how did World War I contribute to the Great Migration?
Hint
Reread paragraph 3. What two things did the war do to the North's need for workers?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3: "Factories were producing weapons, ships and supplies, and the war had nearly cut off immigration from Europe, which had supplied much of industry's labor. Some employers sent recruiters south."
Step by step:
War production increased the number of factory jobs in the North.
At the same time, the war cut off the usual supply of European immigrant workers.
With more jobs and fewer workers, employers looked to the South, and many African Americans moved north to fill those jobs.
The boll weevil, not the war, destroyed cotton crops (paragraph 2). The passage does not say the war ended Jim Crow laws; paragraph 4 says discrimination continued. And it does not describe soldiers being stationed in the North.
The correct answer is The war increased demand for factory workers in the North while cutting off the flow of workers from Europe.
Tip: Do not mix up separate causes that appear in the same passage. Ask which detail the passage actually connects to the event in the question.
Question 30 of 35 · The Cold War
Highways and the Cold War
(1) In 1956, President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Federal-Aid Highway Act. It created the National System of Interstate and Defense Highways, a planned network of about 41,000 miles of high-speed, limited-access roads. The federal government agreed to pay 90 percent of the construction cost, and the states would pay the rest. The federal share would come from a tax on gasoline placed in a new Highway Trust Fund.
(2) The highways had a Cold War purpose as well as an economic one. The United States and the Soviet Union were rivals, and both had nuclear weapons. Supporters argued that in a national emergency, good roads would let the military move troops and equipment quickly and help people evacuate cities. Eisenhower also remembered a 1919 army truck convoy that had taken about two months to cross the country on poor roads.
(3) The interstates changed where Americans lived. Fast highways made it practical to live in a suburb and drive to a job in the city. Shopping centers, factories and offices followed people out of central cities. In many cities, highway routes were drawn through older, often low-income and minority neighborhoods, destroying homes and businesses and splitting communities apart. Cars became the main way to get around, which increased traffic and air pollution.
Which detail from the passage best shows that the Cold War influenced the interstate highway program?
Hint
The Cold War began after World War II. Which detail connects the highways to the rivalry with the Soviet Union?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2: "The United States and the Soviet Union were rivals, and both had nuclear weapons. Supporters argued that in a national emergency, good roads would let the military move troops and equipment quickly and help people evacuate cities."
Step by step:
The Cold War was the rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union that began after World War II.
The detail about moving troops and evacuating cities during an emergency directly connects the highways to fears of a Soviet attack.
The 1919 convoy is a military detail, but 1919 is decades before the Cold War, so it shows Eisenhower's personal experience, not Cold War influence.
The 90 percent federal funding and the growth of suburban shopping centers describe how the program was paid for and what it caused, not why the Cold War shaped it.
The correct answer is Supporters argued the roads would help the military move troops and help people evacuate cities in a national emergency.
Tip: When two choices both seem related (both mention the military here), check the dates. A detail from 1919 cannot show the influence of a conflict that began in the late 1940s.
Question 31 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities
Notice of Public Hearing
City of Fairmont(a fictional city)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(1) The Fairmont City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 10, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 200 Main Street. The hearing will also be streamed live on the city's website.
(2) Purpose: The council will consider Ordinance 26-14. The ordinance would rezone 12 acres at the corner of Oak Avenue and Route 9 from "agricultural" to "commercial" so that a grocery store and parking lot can be built.
(3) How to take part: Any resident may speak for up to three minutes. Sign up at the door before 6:15 p.m. Residents who cannot attend may email written comments to the city clerk until noon on Monday, March 9. All spoken and written comments become part of the public record.
(4) The full text of the ordinance and a traffic study are available for review at City Hall and at the public library during regular hours.
(5) The council will vote on the ordinance at its regular meeting on Tuesday, March 24.
According to the notice, how can a Fairmont resident who cannot attend the hearing share an opinion about the ordinance?
Hint
Look in paragraph 3 for what residents who cannot attend may do.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3: "Residents who cannot attend may email written comments to the city clerk until noon on Monday, March 9."
Step by step:
The question is about residents who cannot come to the hearing.
Paragraph 3 gives them one option: email written comments to the city clerk before the deadline.
The live stream (paragraph 1) lets people watch, but the notice does not say viewers can speak online.
The March 24 vote is taken by the council, not by residents, and the notice does not mention phoning council members.
The correct answer is By emailing written comments to the city clerk before noon on March 9.
Tip: Public notices pack details into short sections. Find the section heading that matches the question (here, "How to take part") and read it closely.
Question 32 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities
Select allNotice of Public Hearing
City of Fairmont(a fictional city)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
(1) The Fairmont City Council will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, March 10, at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City Hall, 200 Main Street. The hearing will also be streamed live on the city's website.
(2) Purpose: The council will consider Ordinance 26-14. The ordinance would rezone 12 acres at the corner of Oak Avenue and Route 9 from "agricultural" to "commercial" so that a grocery store and parking lot can be built.
(3) How to take part: Any resident may speak for up to three minutes. Sign up at the door before 6:15 p.m. Residents who cannot attend may email written comments to the city clerk until noon on Monday, March 9. All spoken and written comments become part of the public record.
(4) The full text of the ordinance and a traffic study are available for review at City Hall and at the public library during regular hours.
(5) The council will vote on the ordinance at its regular meeting on Tuesday, March 24.
Which features of the notice show that Fairmont's government is trying to be open and accountable to residents? Select all that apply.
Select all that apply.
Hint
Look for features that let residents watch, speak or see the information the council will use. Skip details that only describe the land or the project.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1: the hearing "will also be streamed live." Paragraph 3: "Any resident may speak," and comments "become part of the public record." Paragraph 4: the ordinance and traffic study "are available for review."
Step by step:
Streaming the hearing live lets anyone see what happens. Open. ✔
Letting any resident speak gives citizens a voice before the vote. Open. ✔
Making the ordinance and traffic study available lets residents see the same information the council will use. Open. ✔
The land is currently zoned agricultural is a fact about the property, not about how the government involves residents. ✘
The plan includes a parking lot describes the project itself. ✘
The correct answers are the live stream, the chance for any resident to speak and the public availability of the ordinance and traffic study.
Tip: Open government means citizens can see what officials are doing and take part before decisions are made. Look for features that do one of those two things.
Question 33 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Should City Elections Be Nonpartisan?
In most U.S. cities, candidates for mayor and city council run without party labels on the ballot. These nonpartisan elections began as a Progressive Era reform. Reformers hoped to weaken political machines, which were party organizations that traded city jobs and favors for votes. The fictional city of Harwell is considering adding party labels to its city ballots. Two residents share their views.
Dana Ruiz, retired city clerk
(1) Fixing potholes and running a water plant is not a Democratic or Republican job. Without party labels, voters have to learn about the actual candidates instead of simply voting for their party. In my thirty years at City Hall, the council members who worked best together were the ones who never thought of themselves as party soldiers. Adding labels would drag national arguments into local problems.
Marcus Bell, high school government teacher
(2) A party label is a useful shortcut. Most voters do not have time to research a dozen candidates for city council, and some studies have found that turnout tends to be lower in nonpartisan local elections. Without labels, many voters fall back on name recognition, which helps incumbents and candidates who can afford more advertising. Parties also give voters someone to hold responsible when things go wrong.
According to the introduction, why did Progressive Era reformers promote nonpartisan city elections?
Hint
Read the italic introduction. What did reformers hope to weaken?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: The introduction says, "Reformers hoped to weaken political machines, which were party organizations that traded city jobs and favors for votes."
Step by step:
The question asks about the original purpose of nonpartisan elections, which the introduction explains.
Political machines were powerful party organizations. Removing party labels from city ballots was meant to reduce their control over city government.
The other choices describe goals the passage never mentions. Bell's point about turnout is an argument made today, and it actually says turnout tends to be lower in nonpartisan elections.
The correct answer is To weaken political machines that traded city jobs and favors for votes.
Tip: On the GED, italic introductions to a passage often contain key background facts. Read them as carefully as the main text.
Question 34 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Should City Elections Be Nonpartisan?
In most U.S. cities, candidates for mayor and city council run without party labels on the ballot. These nonpartisan elections began as a Progressive Era reform. Reformers hoped to weaken political machines, which were party organizations that traded city jobs and favors for votes. The fictional city of Harwell is considering adding party labels to its city ballots. Two residents share their views.
Dana Ruiz, retired city clerk
(1) Fixing potholes and running a water plant is not a Democratic or Republican job. Without party labels, voters have to learn about the actual candidates instead of simply voting for their party. In my thirty years at City Hall, the council members who worked best together were the ones who never thought of themselves as party soldiers. Adding labels would drag national arguments into local problems.
Marcus Bell, high school government teacher
(2) A party label is a useful shortcut. Most voters do not have time to research a dozen candidates for city council, and some studies have found that turnout tends to be lower in nonpartisan local elections. Without labels, many voters fall back on name recognition, which helps incumbents and candidates who can afford more advertising. Parties also give voters someone to hold responsible when things go wrong.
Which statement would both Ruiz and Bell most likely agree with?
Hint
Find an idea that appears, in some form, in both paragraphs, even if the two writers judge it differently.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Ruiz (paragraph 1): "Without party labels, voters have to learn about the actual candidates instead of simply voting for their party." Bell (paragraph 2): "A party label is a useful shortcut," and without labels "many voters fall back on name recognition."
Step by step:
Both writers assume that party labels change how voters decide. Ruiz thinks labels lead people to vote by party instead of learning about candidates. Bell thinks labels help busy voters choose. They disagree about whether that effect is good, but both believe it exists.
"Turnout is lower without labels" is Bell's point only; Ruiz never discusses turnout.
"City services are not partisan issues" is Ruiz's point only; Bell does not address it.
"Name recognition helps incumbents" is Bell's point only.
The correct answer is Whether party labels appear on the ballot affects how voters choose among candidates.
Tip: For "both authors agree" questions, eliminate any choice that only one author mentions. The answer is often an assumption that both arguments share.
Question 35 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Should City Elections Be Nonpartisan?
In most U.S. cities, candidates for mayor and city council run without party labels on the ballot. These nonpartisan elections began as a Progressive Era reform. Reformers hoped to weaken political machines, which were party organizations that traded city jobs and favors for votes. The fictional city of Harwell is considering adding party labels to its city ballots. Two residents share their views.
Dana Ruiz, retired city clerk
(1) Fixing potholes and running a water plant is not a Democratic or Republican job. Without party labels, voters have to learn about the actual candidates instead of simply voting for their party. In my thirty years at City Hall, the council members who worked best together were the ones who never thought of themselves as party soldiers. Adding labels would drag national arguments into local problems.
Marcus Bell, high school government teacher
(2) A party label is a useful shortcut. Most voters do not have time to research a dozen candidates for city council, and some studies have found that turnout tends to be lower in nonpartisan local elections. Without labels, many voters fall back on name recognition, which helps incumbents and candidates who can afford more advertising. Parties also give voters someone to hold responsible when things go wrong.
Which statement from the passage is a fact that could be checked, rather than an opinion?
Hint
A fact can be proven true or false with records or data. An opinion is a judgment, belief or prediction.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: The introduction states, "In most U.S. cities, candidates for mayor and city council run without party labels on the ballot."
Step by step:
The introduction's statement can be checked by looking at how cities run their elections. It is a fact.
"Fixing potholes ... is not a Democratic or Republican job" is Ruiz's judgment about what local government should be like. Opinion.
"A party label is a useful shortcut" is Bell's judgment; the word useful signals an evaluation. Opinion.
"Adding labels would drag national arguments into local problems" is a prediction about the future that cannot be proven now. Opinion.
The correct answer is "In most U.S. cities, candidates for mayor and city council run without party labels on the ballot."
Tip: Words like useful, best, should and would often mark opinions or predictions. Statements about counts, dates and records are usually facts.