GED Social Studies Practice Test 4

Question 1 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Trade, Taxes and the President in the U.S. Constitution (1787)

The Constitution divides power over taxes and trade between Congress and the President. Read the four excerpts and the note that follows.

(1) Article I, Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;" …

(2) Article I, Section 8 (continued): "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"

(3) Article I, Section 9: "No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State."

(4) Article II, Section 3: "He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; … he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States."

Word help: duties and imposts = taxes on imported goods (also called tariffs); excises = taxes on goods made or sold at home; uniform = the same everywhere; expedient = useful or wise; "He" in Article II = the President.

Editor's note: Beginning with the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934, Congress has passed laws that allow the President to negotiate trade agreements and, in certain situations, to raise or lower tariffs within limits that Congress sets. Congress can change or repeal these laws.

According to paragraph 1, which part of the national government has the power to place taxes, such as tariffs, on imported goods?

Answer choices
Hint

Find the subject of the sentence in paragraph 1: who "shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts"?

Question 2 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Drop-down
Trade, Taxes and the President in the U.S. Constitution (1787)

The Constitution divides power over taxes and trade between Congress and the President. Read the four excerpts and the note that follows.

(1) Article I, Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;" …

(2) Article I, Section 8 (continued): "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"

(3) Article I, Section 9: "No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State."

(4) Article II, Section 3: "He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; … he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States."

Word help: duties and imposts = taxes on imported goods (also called tariffs); excises = taxes on goods made or sold at home; uniform = the same everywhere; expedient = useful or wise; "He" in Article II = the President.

Editor's note: Beginning with the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934, Congress has passed laws that allow the President to negotiate trade agreements and, in certain situations, to raise or lower tariffs within limits that Congress sets. Congress can change or repeal these laws.

Use paragraph 4 to complete the sentences.

In the State of the Union message, the President new laws. The power to actually pass those laws belongs to . Once a law is passed, the President's duty is to .

Choose an answer from each menu.

Hint

Look for the verbs in paragraph 4: what does the President do "to their Consideration," and what must he "take Care" of?

Question 3 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

Trade, Taxes and the President in the U.S. Constitution (1787)

The Constitution divides power over taxes and trade between Congress and the President. Read the four excerpts and the note that follows.

(1) Article I, Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;" …

(2) Article I, Section 8 (continued): "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"

(3) Article I, Section 9: "No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State."

(4) Article II, Section 3: "He shall from time to time give to the Congress Information of the State of the Union, and recommend to their Consideration such Measures as he shall judge necessary and expedient; … he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States."

Word help: duties and imposts = taxes on imported goods (also called tariffs); excises = taxes on goods made or sold at home; uniform = the same everywhere; expedient = useful or wise; "He" in Article II = the President.

Editor's note: Beginning with the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934, Congress has passed laws that allow the President to negotiate trade agreements and, in certain situations, to raise or lower tariffs within limits that Congress sets. Congress can change or repeal these laws.

The editor's note describes laws that let the President raise or lower some tariffs. Which statement best explains how these laws fit with paragraph 1?

Answer choices
Hint

Who holds the tariff power under paragraph 1? Who wrote the laws described in the note, and who can change them?

Question 4 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Hot spot
Presidential Vetoes and Overrides

Under Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution, the President can veto (reject) a bill passed by Congress by returning it with objections. Congress can then override the veto and make the bill a law anyway, but only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to do so. The chart shows the regular vetoes of eight presidents who served between 1945 and 1989, and how many of those vetoes Congress overrode. Pocket vetoes, which happen when Congress has adjourned and the bill cannot be returned, are not shown, because Congress has no chance to override them.

Grouped bar chart of regular vetoes and vetoes overridden by Congress for eight presidents. Truman (1945–53): 180 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Eisenhower (1953–61): 73 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Kennedy (1961–63): 12 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Johnson (1963–69): 16 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Nixon (1969–74): 26 regular vetoes, 7 overridden; Ford (1974–77): 48 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Carter (1977–81): 13 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Reagan (1981–89): 39 regular vetoes, 9 overridden. Source: U.S. Senate. Regular Vetoes and Vetoes Overridden, by President Regular vetoes Vetoes overridden by Congress 0 40 80 120 160 200 Number of vetoes 180 12 Truman 1945–53 73 2 Eisenhower 1953–61 12 0 Kennedy 1961–63 16 0 Johnson 1963–69 26 7 Nixon 1969–74 48 12 Ford 1974–77 13 2 Carter 1977–81 39 9 Reagan 1981–89 Source: U.S. Senate, Summary of Bills Vetoed. Pocket vetoes are not shown.

Look at the chart. Click the president who issued the most regular vetoes.

Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).

Grouped bar chart of regular vetoes and vetoes overridden by Congress for eight presidents. Truman (1945–53): 180 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Eisenhower (1953–61): 73 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Kennedy (1961–63): 12 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Johnson (1963–69): 16 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Nixon (1969–74): 26 regular vetoes, 7 overridden; Ford (1974–77): 48 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Carter (1977–81): 13 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Reagan (1981–89): 39 regular vetoes, 9 overridden. Source: U.S. Senate. Regular Vetoes and Vetoes Overridden, by President Regular vetoes Vetoes overridden by Congress 0 40 80 120 160 200 Number of vetoes 180 12 Truman 1945–53 73 2 Eisenhower 1953–61 12 0 Kennedy 1961–63 16 0 Johnson 1963–69 26 7 Nixon 1969–74 48 12 Ford 1974–77 13 2 Carter 1977–81 39 9 Reagan 1981–89 Source: U.S. Senate, Summary of Bills Vetoed. Pocket vetoes are not shown.
Hint

Compare only the blue bars. Find the tallest one and read the number above it.

Question 5 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Fill in
Presidential Vetoes and Overrides

Under Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution, the President can veto (reject) a bill passed by Congress by returning it with objections. Congress can then override the veto and make the bill a law anyway, but only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to do so. The chart shows the regular vetoes of eight presidents who served between 1945 and 1989, and how many of those vetoes Congress overrode. Pocket vetoes, which happen when Congress has adjourned and the bill cannot be returned, are not shown, because Congress has no chance to override them.

Grouped bar chart of regular vetoes and vetoes overridden by Congress for eight presidents. Truman (1945–53): 180 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Eisenhower (1953–61): 73 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Kennedy (1961–63): 12 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Johnson (1963–69): 16 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Nixon (1969–74): 26 regular vetoes, 7 overridden; Ford (1974–77): 48 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Carter (1977–81): 13 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Reagan (1981–89): 39 regular vetoes, 9 overridden. Source: U.S. Senate. Regular Vetoes and Vetoes Overridden, by President Regular vetoes Vetoes overridden by Congress 0 40 80 120 160 200 Number of vetoes 180 12 Truman 1945–53 73 2 Eisenhower 1953–61 12 0 Kennedy 1961–63 16 0 Johnson 1963–69 26 7 Nixon 1969–74 48 12 Ford 1974–77 13 2 Carter 1977–81 39 9 Reagan 1981–89 Source: U.S. Senate, Summary of Bills Vetoed. Pocket vetoes are not shown.

Based on the chart, what percent of President Ford's regular vetoes did Congress override?

%

Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.

Hint

Percent = part ÷ whole × 100. Here the part is the red bar and the whole is the blue bar for Ford.

Question 6 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

Presidential Vetoes and Overrides

Under Article I, Section 7 of the Constitution, the President can veto (reject) a bill passed by Congress by returning it with objections. Congress can then override the veto and make the bill a law anyway, but only if two-thirds of the House and two-thirds of the Senate vote to do so. The chart shows the regular vetoes of eight presidents who served between 1945 and 1989, and how many of those vetoes Congress overrode. Pocket vetoes, which happen when Congress has adjourned and the bill cannot be returned, are not shown, because Congress has no chance to override them.

Grouped bar chart of regular vetoes and vetoes overridden by Congress for eight presidents. Truman (1945–53): 180 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Eisenhower (1953–61): 73 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Kennedy (1961–63): 12 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Johnson (1963–69): 16 regular vetoes, 0 overridden; Nixon (1969–74): 26 regular vetoes, 7 overridden; Ford (1974–77): 48 regular vetoes, 12 overridden; Carter (1977–81): 13 regular vetoes, 2 overridden; Reagan (1981–89): 39 regular vetoes, 9 overridden. Source: U.S. Senate. Regular Vetoes and Vetoes Overridden, by President Regular vetoes Vetoes overridden by Congress 0 40 80 120 160 200 Number of vetoes 180 12 Truman 1945–53 73 2 Eisenhower 1953–61 12 0 Kennedy 1961–63 16 0 Johnson 1963–69 26 7 Nixon 1969–74 48 12 Ford 1974–77 13 2 Carter 1977–81 39 9 Reagan 1981–89 Source: U.S. Senate, Summary of Bills Vetoed. Pocket vetoes are not shown.

Which president had the largest share of his regular vetoes overridden by Congress?

Answer choices
Hint

A share is a percent. For each choice, divide the red number by the blue number.

Question 7 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Executive Orders: Power With Limits

(1) An executive order is a written directive from the President to officials and agencies in the executive branch. It tells them how to carry out their work. The Constitution does not mention executive orders by name. Presidents base them on their powers under Article II, such as the duty to see that laws are carried out and the role of Commander in Chief, or on powers that Congress has given the President by law.

(2) Executive orders have been used for major decisions. In 1948, President Harry Truman issued Executive Order 9981, which called for equal treatment and opportunity for all people in the armed forces. It was an important step toward ending racial segregation in the U.S. military.

(3) Still, an executive order is not the same as a law passed by Congress, and its power has limits. Federal courts can rule that an order goes beyond what the President is allowed to do. In 1952, during the Korean War, Truman ordered the government to take control of the nation's steel mills to keep a strike from stopping production. In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the Supreme Court ruled that neither the Constitution nor any law gave the President the power to seize private property in this way, and the mills were returned to their owners.

(4) Congress can respond as well. It can pass a law that overturns or blocks an order, although the President may veto that law. Congress can also refuse to provide the money needed to carry out an order. Finally, an executive order lasts only as long as presidents keep it: a later President can change or cancel (revoke) an earlier President's order simply by issuing a new one.

According to paragraph 1, an executive order is best described as

Answer choices
Hint

Reread the first sentence of paragraph 1. Who writes an executive order, and to whom?

Question 8 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

Select all
Executive Orders: Power With Limits

(1) An executive order is a written directive from the President to officials and agencies in the executive branch. It tells them how to carry out their work. The Constitution does not mention executive orders by name. Presidents base them on their powers under Article II, such as the duty to see that laws are carried out and the role of Commander in Chief, or on powers that Congress has given the President by law.

(2) Executive orders have been used for major decisions. In 1948, President Harry Truman issued Executive Order 9981, which called for equal treatment and opportunity for all people in the armed forces. It was an important step toward ending racial segregation in the U.S. military.

(3) Still, an executive order is not the same as a law passed by Congress, and its power has limits. Federal courts can rule that an order goes beyond what the President is allowed to do. In 1952, during the Korean War, Truman ordered the government to take control of the nation's steel mills to keep a strike from stopping production. In Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, the Supreme Court ruled that neither the Constitution nor any law gave the President the power to seize private property in this way, and the mills were returned to their owners.

(4) Congress can respond as well. It can pass a law that overturns or blocks an order, although the President may veto that law. Congress can also refuse to provide the money needed to carry out an order. Finally, an executive order lasts only as long as presidents keep it: a later President can change or cancel (revoke) an earlier President's order simply by issuing a new one.

Based on the passage, which actions could limit or end a President's executive order? Select all that apply.

Select all that apply.

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraphs 3 and 4 list the checks. Judge each choice against them one at a time.

Question 9 of 35 · World War I and World War II

Franklin D. Roosevelt, Address to Congress, December 8, 1941

On December 8, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke to a joint session of Congress. The day before, Japanese forces had attacked the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

(1) "Yesterday, December 7, 1941—a date which will live in infamy—the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan."

(2) "The United States was at peace with that Nation and, at the solicitation of Japan, was still in conversation with its Government and its Emperor looking toward the maintenance of peace in the Pacific." …

(3) "As Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense." …

(4) "Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory, and our interests are in grave danger." …

(5) "I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese Empire."

Word help: infamy = lasting shame; solicitation = request; hostilities = acts of war; no blinking at = no ignoring; dastardly = cowardly and cruel.

Note: Congress voted to declare war on Japan later that same day. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power "To declare War."

What was Roosevelt's main purpose in this address?

Answer choices
Hint

Look at what Roosevelt directly asks Congress to do in the last paragraph of the excerpt.

Question 10 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Franklin D. Roosevelt, Address to Congress, December 8, 1941

On December 8, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt spoke to a joint session of Congress. The day before, Japanese forces had attacked the U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii.

(1) "Yesterday, December 7, 1941—a date which will live in infamy—the United States of America was suddenly and deliberately attacked by naval and air forces of the Empire of Japan."

(2) "The United States was at peace with that Nation and, at the solicitation of Japan, was still in conversation with its Government and its Emperor looking toward the maintenance of peace in the Pacific." …

(3) "As Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy I have directed that all measures be taken for our defense." …

(4) "Hostilities exist. There is no blinking at the fact that our people, our territory, and our interests are in grave danger." …

(5) "I ask that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese Empire."

Word help: infamy = lasting shame; solicitation = request; hostilities = acts of war; no blinking at = no ignoring; dastardly = cowardly and cruel.

Note: Congress voted to declare war on Japan later that same day. Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power "To declare War."

In paragraph 3, Roosevelt says he has already "directed that all measures be taken for our defense." Yet in paragraph 5 he still asks Congress for a declaration of war. Which explanation is best supported by the Constitution?

Answer choices
Hint

Read the note at the end of the excerpt. Which branch holds the power "To declare War"?

Question 11 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Fill in
The War Powers Resolution (1973)

Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in November 1973, near the end of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. President Richard Nixon vetoed it, and Congress overrode his veto. The law was meant to give Congress a stronger voice when a President sends troops into combat without a declaration of war. The excerpts below are from the law as it appears in the U.S. Code.

(1) 50 U.S.C. 1541(c): "The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

(2) 50 U.S.C. 1543(a): "In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced— (1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances; … the President shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing," …

(3) 50 U.S.C. 1544(b): "Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 1543(a)(1) of this title, whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces."

Word help: hostilities = fighting; imminent = about to happen; pursuant to = following; specific statutory authorization = permission given in a law passed by Congress; section 1543(a)(1) = the 48-hour report rule in paragraph 2; terminate = end; certifies = formally states.

A President reports to Congress that U.S. forces have been sent into hostilities. Congress does not declare war, pass an authorization or extend the deadline. The President certifies in writing that unavoidable military necessity requires more time to remove the forces safely.

According to paragraph 3, what is the greatest total number of days after the report that the forces may remain?

days

Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.

Hint

Paragraph 3 sets a first deadline and then allows one extension. Add them.

Question 12 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

The War Powers Resolution (1973)

Congress passed the War Powers Resolution in November 1973, near the end of U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War. President Richard Nixon vetoed it, and Congress overrode his veto. The law was meant to give Congress a stronger voice when a President sends troops into combat without a declaration of war. The excerpts below are from the law as it appears in the U.S. Code.

(1) 50 U.S.C. 1541(c): "The constitutional powers of the President as Commander-in-Chief to introduce United States Armed Forces into hostilities, or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, are exercised only pursuant to (1) a declaration of war, (2) specific statutory authorization, or (3) a national emergency created by attack upon the United States, its territories or possessions, or its armed forces."

(2) 50 U.S.C. 1543(a): "In the absence of a declaration of war, in any case in which United States Armed Forces are introduced— (1) into hostilities or into situations where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances; … the President shall submit within 48 hours to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President pro tempore of the Senate a report, in writing," …

(3) 50 U.S.C. 1544(b): "Within sixty calendar days after a report is submitted or is required to be submitted pursuant to section 1543(a)(1) of this title, whichever is earlier, the President shall terminate any use of United States Armed Forces with respect to which such report was submitted (or required to be submitted), unless the Congress (1) has declared war or has enacted a specific authorization for such use of United States Armed Forces, (2) has extended by law such sixty-day period, or (3) is physically unable to meet as a result of an armed attack upon the United States. Such sixty-day period shall be extended for not more than an additional thirty days if the President determines and certifies to the Congress in writing that unavoidable military necessity respecting the safety of United States Armed Forces requires the continued use of such armed forces in the course of bringing about a prompt removal of such forces."

Word help: hostilities = fighting; imminent = about to happen; pursuant to = following; specific statutory authorization = permission given in a law passed by Congress; section 1543(a)(1) = the 48-hour report rule in paragraph 2; terminate = end; certifies = formally states.

A President sends U.S. forces into fighting overseas. There has been no declaration of war, no specific authorization in a law, and no attack on the United States, its territories or its armed forces. Which statement is best supported by the excerpts?

Answer choices
Hint

Check the scenario against the three situations in paragraph 1, then apply the deadlines in paragraphs 2 and 3.

Question 13 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections

Drag and drop
The Road to the White House

(1) Choosing a President takes more than a year. The process begins when candidates announce that they are running and start raising money and campaigning. Most candidates run as members of a political party.

(2) Next come the primary elections and caucuses, held state by state, usually from January through June of the election year. In a primary, voters cast ballots for the candidate they want their party to nominate. In a caucus, party members meet in person to discuss the candidates and choose. The results decide how many delegates each candidate wins.

(3) In the summer, each major party holds a national convention. The delegates formally nominate the party's candidate for President, and the candidate's choice for Vice President is confirmed. The party also adopts a platform, a statement of its goals and positions.

(4) The general election is held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. On that day, voters are not directly electing the President. In each state, they are choosing a group of electors pledged to a candidate. Each state has as many electors as it has members of Congress (senators plus representatives), and the District of Columbia has three. There are 538 electors in all. In 48 states and the District of Columbia, the candidate who wins the most popular votes in the state wins all of that state's electors. Maine and Nebraska divide some of their electors by congressional district.

(5) In December, the electors meet in their states and cast their votes. Congress counts the votes in January. A candidate needs a majority, at least 270 of the 538 electoral votes, to win. If no candidate reaches 270, the House of Representatives chooses the President, with each state's delegation casting one vote. The new President takes the oath of office on January 20.

(6) Because most states give all of their electors to the statewide winner, a candidate can win the most popular votes nationwide and still lose in the Electoral College. This has happened in several elections, including 1876, 1888, 2000 and 2016.

Drag each step of a presidential election into the correct order, from first to last.

1st2nd3rd4th

Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.

Hint

Look for time words in paragraphs 2–5: January through June, summer, November, December.

Question 14 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections

The Road to the White House

(1) Choosing a President takes more than a year. The process begins when candidates announce that they are running and start raising money and campaigning. Most candidates run as members of a political party.

(2) Next come the primary elections and caucuses, held state by state, usually from January through June of the election year. In a primary, voters cast ballots for the candidate they want their party to nominate. In a caucus, party members meet in person to discuss the candidates and choose. The results decide how many delegates each candidate wins.

(3) In the summer, each major party holds a national convention. The delegates formally nominate the party's candidate for President, and the candidate's choice for Vice President is confirmed. The party also adopts a platform, a statement of its goals and positions.

(4) The general election is held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. On that day, voters are not directly electing the President. In each state, they are choosing a group of electors pledged to a candidate. Each state has as many electors as it has members of Congress (senators plus representatives), and the District of Columbia has three. There are 538 electors in all. In 48 states and the District of Columbia, the candidate who wins the most popular votes in the state wins all of that state's electors. Maine and Nebraska divide some of their electors by congressional district.

(5) In December, the electors meet in their states and cast their votes. Congress counts the votes in January. A candidate needs a majority, at least 270 of the 538 electoral votes, to win. If no candidate reaches 270, the House of Representatives chooses the President, with each state's delegation casting one vote. The new President takes the oath of office on January 20.

(6) Because most states give all of their electors to the statewide winner, a candidate can win the most popular votes nationwide and still lose in the Electoral College. This has happened in several elections, including 1876, 1888, 2000 and 2016.

According to paragraphs 4 and 6, which situation could allow a candidate to become President without winning the most popular votes nationwide?

Answer choices
Hint

In most states, does winning a state by a little give a candidate fewer electors than winning it by a lot?

Question 15 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections

The Road to the White House

(1) Choosing a President takes more than a year. The process begins when candidates announce that they are running and start raising money and campaigning. Most candidates run as members of a political party.

(2) Next come the primary elections and caucuses, held state by state, usually from January through June of the election year. In a primary, voters cast ballots for the candidate they want their party to nominate. In a caucus, party members meet in person to discuss the candidates and choose. The results decide how many delegates each candidate wins.

(3) In the summer, each major party holds a national convention. The delegates formally nominate the party's candidate for President, and the candidate's choice for Vice President is confirmed. The party also adopts a platform, a statement of its goals and positions.

(4) The general election is held on the Tuesday after the first Monday in November. On that day, voters are not directly electing the President. In each state, they are choosing a group of electors pledged to a candidate. Each state has as many electors as it has members of Congress (senators plus representatives), and the District of Columbia has three. There are 538 electors in all. In 48 states and the District of Columbia, the candidate who wins the most popular votes in the state wins all of that state's electors. Maine and Nebraska divide some of their electors by congressional district.

(5) In December, the electors meet in their states and cast their votes. Congress counts the votes in January. A candidate needs a majority, at least 270 of the 538 electoral votes, to win. If no candidate reaches 270, the House of Representatives chooses the President, with each state's delegation casting one vote. The new President takes the oath of office on January 20.

(6) Because most states give all of their electors to the statewide winner, a candidate can win the most popular votes nationwide and still lose in the Electoral College. This has happened in several elections, including 1876, 1888, 2000 and 2016.

In a hypothetical election, three candidates win electoral votes: Candidate X wins 260, Candidate Y wins 250 and Candidate Z wins 28. Based on the passage, what happens next?

Answer choices
Hint

Add the votes to check the total, then compare the leader's number with the majority needed in paragraph 5.

Question 16 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments

Two Executives, Two Systems

Kordania and Lessaro are fictional countries.

(1) In Kordania, General Varo took power after the army removed the elected government. He suspended the constitution, closed the national legislature and banned every political party except his own. Newspapers must send their stories to government censors before printing. Varo rules by decree: his orders take effect immediately and cannot be challenged in court. He has not set a date for elections.

(2) In Lessaro, the president is elected by the people to a five-year term and may serve no more than two terms. A written constitution lists the rights of citizens, including freedom of the press. The president can propose laws and veto bills, but the elected legislature can override a veto with a two-thirds vote. Independent judges have struck down presidential orders that violated the constitution. Several political parties compete in regular elections.

Which type of government does Kordania have?

Answer choices
Hint

Who holds power in Kordania, how did he get it, and can anyone limit it?

Question 17 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments

Two Executives, Two Systems

Kordania and Lessaro are fictional countries.

(1) In Kordania, General Varo took power after the army removed the elected government. He suspended the constitution, closed the national legislature and banned every political party except his own. Newspapers must send their stories to government censors before printing. Varo rules by decree: his orders take effect immediately and cannot be challenged in court. He has not set a date for elections.

(2) In Lessaro, the president is elected by the people to a five-year term and may serve no more than two terms. A written constitution lists the rights of citizens, including freedom of the press. The president can propose laws and veto bills, but the elected legislature can override a veto with a two-thirds vote. Independent judges have struck down presidential orders that violated the constitution. Several political parties compete in regular elections.

Which choice correctly matches a feature of Lessaro's government with the constitutional principle it shows?

Answer choices
Hint

Test each pair: does the feature really illustrate that principle? Recall what federalism, popular sovereignty and separation of powers mean.

Question 18 of 35 · Contemporary public policy

A Proposed Tariff on Imported Steel: Two Views

Congress is debating a proposed 25 percent tariff on imported steel. Two fictional writers share their views.

Viewpoint 1 — Dana Whitfield, a fictional spokesperson for a steelworkers' group

(1) Over the past ten years, imports of low-priced foreign steel have grown, and three mills in our region have closed. A 25 percent tariff on imported steel would give American mills a fair chance to compete. When mills stay open, so do the diners, hardware stores and schools that depend on mill paychecks.

(2) Steel is also a matter of national security. A country that cannot make its own steel must rely on others to build its ships, bridges and power lines. In my view, no price is too high to keep that ability at home.

Viewpoint 2 — Marcus Lee, a fictional owner of a company that builds farm equipment

(3) My company buys about 4,000 tons of steel each year. A 25 percent tariff would raise the price of imported steel, and American mills would likely raise their prices too, since they would face less competition. That would add to the cost of every tractor we build.

(4) Higher steel prices would hurt the many industries that use steel, such as car makers, appliance makers and builders. Other countries could also respond with tariffs of their own on American farm products, which would hurt my customers. The best way to protect jobs is to keep costs low and markets open.

On which point would both writers most likely agree?

Answer choices
Hint

Find something that Viewpoint 1 assumes and Viewpoint 2 states directly. Eliminate ideas only one writer supports.

Question 19 of 35 · Contemporary public policy

A Proposed Tariff on Imported Steel: Two Views

Congress is debating a proposed 25 percent tariff on imported steel. Two fictional writers share their views.

Viewpoint 1 — Dana Whitfield, a fictional spokesperson for a steelworkers' group

(1) Over the past ten years, imports of low-priced foreign steel have grown, and three mills in our region have closed. A 25 percent tariff on imported steel would give American mills a fair chance to compete. When mills stay open, so do the diners, hardware stores and schools that depend on mill paychecks.

(2) Steel is also a matter of national security. A country that cannot make its own steel must rely on others to build its ships, bridges and power lines. In my view, no price is too high to keep that ability at home.

Viewpoint 2 — Marcus Lee, a fictional owner of a company that builds farm equipment

(3) My company buys about 4,000 tons of steel each year. A 25 percent tariff would raise the price of imported steel, and American mills would likely raise their prices too, since they would face less competition. That would add to the cost of every tractor we build.

(4) Higher steel prices would hurt the many industries that use steel, such as car makers, appliance makers and builders. Other countries could also respond with tariffs of their own on American farm products, which would hurt my customers. The best way to protect jobs is to keep costs low and markets open.

Which statement from the passage is an opinion rather than a fact?

Answer choices
Hint

A fact can be checked with records or measurements. An opinion is a judgment that people could reasonably disagree with. Watch for signal words.

Question 20 of 35 · World War I and World War II

Hot spot
The United States and the Two World Wars

The timeline shows key events involving the United States from the start of World War I to the end of World War II. Events are in order but are not spaced to scale.

Timeline of the United States and the two world wars, events in order (not to scale): 1914: World War I begins in Europe; April 1917: U.S. declares war on Germany; November 1918: Armistice ends the fighting in WWI; March 1920: Senate fails to approve Treaty of Versailles; 1935: Congress passes first Neutrality Act; September 1939: World War II begins in Europe; March 1941: Lend-Lease Act: U.S. lends weapons, supplies to Allies; December 1941: Japan attacks Pearl Harbor; U.S. declares war on Japan; June 1944: D-Day: Allied invasion of Normandy, France; May–Sept. 1945: Germany, then Japan, surrender; war ends. The United States and the Two World Wars, 1914–1945 1914 World War I begins in Europe April 1917 U.S. declares war on Germany November 1918 Armistice ends the fighting in WWI March 1920 Senate fails to approve Treaty of Versailles 1935 Congress passes first Neutrality Act September 1939 World War II begins in Europe March 1941 Lend-Lease Act: U.S. lends weapons, supplies to Allies December 1941 Japan attacks Pearl Harbor; U.S. declares war on Japan June 1944 D-Day: Allied invasion of Normandy, France May–Sept. 1945 Germany, then Japan, surrender; war ends Events are shown in order but are not spaced to scale. Blue = World War I era Green = World War II era

Click the event on the timeline that directly brought the United States into World War II as a combatant.

Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).

Timeline of the United States and the two world wars, events in order (not to scale): 1914: World War I begins in Europe; April 1917: U.S. declares war on Germany; November 1918: Armistice ends the fighting in WWI; March 1920: Senate fails to approve Treaty of Versailles; 1935: Congress passes first Neutrality Act; September 1939: World War II begins in Europe; March 1941: Lend-Lease Act: U.S. lends weapons, supplies to Allies; December 1941: Japan attacks Pearl Harbor; U.S. declares war on Japan; June 1944: D-Day: Allied invasion of Normandy, France; May–Sept. 1945: Germany, then Japan, surrender; war ends. The United States and the Two World Wars, 1914–1945 1914 World War I begins in Europe April 1917 U.S. declares war on Germany November 1918 Armistice ends the fighting in WWI March 1920 Senate fails to approve Treaty of Versailles 1935 Congress passes first Neutrality Act September 1939 World War II begins in Europe March 1941 Lend-Lease Act: U.S. lends weapons, supplies to Allies December 1941 Japan attacks Pearl Harbor; U.S. declares war on Japan June 1944 D-Day: Allied invasion of Normandy, France May–Sept. 1945 Germany, then Japan, surrender; war ends Events are shown in order but are not spaced to scale. Blue = World War I era Green = World War II era
Hint

Look at the green (World War II era) events. Which one includes the United States declaring war?

Question 21 of 35 · World War I and World War II

The United States and the Two World Wars

The timeline shows key events involving the United States from the start of World War I to the end of World War II. Events are in order but are not spaced to scale.

Timeline of the United States and the two world wars, events in order (not to scale): 1914: World War I begins in Europe; April 1917: U.S. declares war on Germany; November 1918: Armistice ends the fighting in WWI; March 1920: Senate fails to approve Treaty of Versailles; 1935: Congress passes first Neutrality Act; September 1939: World War II begins in Europe; March 1941: Lend-Lease Act: U.S. lends weapons, supplies to Allies; December 1941: Japan attacks Pearl Harbor; U.S. declares war on Japan; June 1944: D-Day: Allied invasion of Normandy, France; May–Sept. 1945: Germany, then Japan, surrender; war ends. The United States and the Two World Wars, 1914–1945 1914 World War I begins in Europe April 1917 U.S. declares war on Germany November 1918 Armistice ends the fighting in WWI March 1920 Senate fails to approve Treaty of Versailles 1935 Congress passes first Neutrality Act September 1939 World War II begins in Europe March 1941 Lend-Lease Act: U.S. lends weapons, supplies to Allies December 1941 Japan attacks Pearl Harbor; U.S. declares war on Japan June 1944 D-Day: Allied invasion of Normandy, France May–Sept. 1945 Germany, then Japan, surrender; war ends Events are shown in order but are not spaced to scale. Blue = World War I era Green = World War II era

Which conclusion is best supported by the timeline?

Answer choices
Hint

Check each choice against the dates. Pay attention to which events come before and after December 1941.

Question 22 of 35 · World War I and World War II

Select all
The Home Front in World War II

(1) After the United States entered World War II in December 1941, the war changed daily life for nearly every American. More than 16 million Americans served in the armed forces during the war. Factories that had made cars switched to making tanks, airplanes and trucks. No new cars were built for ordinary buyers from 1942 until the war ended.

(2) With so many men in uniform, employers hired workers they had often turned away before. Millions of women took jobs in factories and shipyards, and "Rosie the Riveter" became a symbol of these workers. Hundreds of thousands of Black Americans moved from the rural South to cities in the North and West to take jobs in defense plants, continuing the movement known as the Great Migration. In 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt had issued Executive Order 8802, which banned discrimination based on race, creed, color or national origin in the defense industry and in government.

(3) The government also asked civilians to sacrifice. To make sure the armed forces had enough supplies, the Office of Price Administration rationed goods such as sugar, coffee, meat, gasoline and tires. Families used ration books with stamps to buy them. Americans bought war bonds, lending money to the government to pay for the war, and planted "victory gardens" to grow their own vegetables. Communities collected scrap metal, rubber and paper to be turned into war materials.

(4) The war also brought injustice at home. Under Executive Order 9066, signed in February 1942, about 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, most of them U.S. citizens, were forced from their homes on the West Coast and held in camps. In 1988, Congress passed a law that apologized and paid $20,000 to each surviving person who had been held.

According to the passage, which were ways that civilians on the home front supported the war effort? Select all that apply.

Select all that apply.

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 3 describes what civilians were asked to do. Check each choice against it, and watch for choices that twist facts from other paragraphs.

Question 23 of 35 · World War I and World War II

The Home Front in World War II

(1) After the United States entered World War II in December 1941, the war changed daily life for nearly every American. More than 16 million Americans served in the armed forces during the war. Factories that had made cars switched to making tanks, airplanes and trucks. No new cars were built for ordinary buyers from 1942 until the war ended.

(2) With so many men in uniform, employers hired workers they had often turned away before. Millions of women took jobs in factories and shipyards, and "Rosie the Riveter" became a symbol of these workers. Hundreds of thousands of Black Americans moved from the rural South to cities in the North and West to take jobs in defense plants, continuing the movement known as the Great Migration. In 1941, President Franklin Roosevelt had issued Executive Order 8802, which banned discrimination based on race, creed, color or national origin in the defense industry and in government.

(3) The government also asked civilians to sacrifice. To make sure the armed forces had enough supplies, the Office of Price Administration rationed goods such as sugar, coffee, meat, gasoline and tires. Families used ration books with stamps to buy them. Americans bought war bonds, lending money to the government to pay for the war, and planted "victory gardens" to grow their own vegetables. Communities collected scrap metal, rubber and paper to be turned into war materials.

(4) The war also brought injustice at home. Under Executive Order 9066, signed in February 1942, about 120,000 people of Japanese ancestry, most of them U.S. citizens, were forced from their homes on the West Coast and held in camps. In 1988, Congress passed a law that apologized and paid $20,000 to each surviving person who had been held.

Based on paragraph 2, what was one effect of the wartime need for workers?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 2 begins with a cause: "With so many men in uniform." What happened as a result?

Question 24 of 35 · Economic causes and impacts of wars

Drop-down
Unemployment and World War II

The unemployment rate is the percent of people in the civilian labor force (people who have a job or are looking for one) who do not have a job. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, millions of Americans were out of work. As World War II approached, and especially after the United States entered the war in December 1941, the federal government spent huge sums on ships, planes, tanks and other supplies, and millions of workers left the civilian labor force to serve in the armed forces.

Line graph of the U.S. unemployment rate as a percent of the civilian labor force: 1939, 17.2%; 1940, 14.6%; 1941, 9.9%; 1942, 4.7%; 1943, 1.9%; 1944, 1.2%; 1945, 1.9%; 1946, 3.9%. The years December 1941 to September 1945, when the U.S. was at war, are shaded. U.S. Unemployment Rate, 1939–1946 U.S. at war (Dec. 1941–Sept. 1945) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 17.2% 1939 14.6% 1940 9.9% 1941 4.7% 1942 1.9% 1943 1.2% 1944 1.9% 1945 3.9% 1946 Percent of civilian labor force Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (annual averages)

Use the graph to complete the sentence.

From 1940 to 1944, the unemployment rate by percentage points.

Choose an answer from each menu.

Hint

Find the points for 1940 and 1944. Is the second one higher or lower? Then subtract the smaller number from the larger.

Question 25 of 35 · Economic causes and impacts of wars

Unemployment and World War II

The unemployment rate is the percent of people in the civilian labor force (people who have a job or are looking for one) who do not have a job. During the Great Depression of the 1930s, millions of Americans were out of work. As World War II approached, and especially after the United States entered the war in December 1941, the federal government spent huge sums on ships, planes, tanks and other supplies, and millions of workers left the civilian labor force to serve in the armed forces.

Line graph of the U.S. unemployment rate as a percent of the civilian labor force: 1939, 17.2%; 1940, 14.6%; 1941, 9.9%; 1942, 4.7%; 1943, 1.9%; 1944, 1.2%; 1945, 1.9%; 1946, 3.9%. The years December 1941 to September 1945, when the U.S. was at war, are shaded. U.S. Unemployment Rate, 1939–1946 U.S. at war (Dec. 1941–Sept. 1945) 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 17.2% 1939 14.6% 1940 9.9% 1941 4.7% 1942 1.9% 1943 1.2% 1944 1.9% 1945 3.9% 1946 Percent of civilian labor force Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (annual averages)

Which conclusion is best supported by the graph and the introduction?

Answer choices
Hint

Check each choice against both the numbers on the graph and the information in the introduction.

Question 26 of 35 · Microeconomics

Fill in
Dalmora's Proposed Tariffs

Dalmora is a fictional country that is considering new tariffs (taxes on imported goods). The table shows the current price of three products, both imported and made in Dalmora, and the proposed tariff rate on each imported product. Assume importers pass the full tariff on to buyers. So the new price of an imported product equals its price before the tariff plus the tariff rate times that price.

Table of prices in the fictional country of Dalmora. Bicycle: imported price before tariff 240 dollars, domestic (Dalmora-made) price 280 dollars, proposed tariff on imports 25%; Washing machine: imported price before tariff 500 dollars, domestic (Dalmora-made) price 560 dollars, proposed tariff on imports 20%; Steel (1 ton): imported price before tariff 600 dollars, domestic (Dalmora-made) price 680 dollars, proposed tariff on imports 10%. Dalmora: Current Prices and Proposed Tariffs Product Imported price (before tariff) Dalmora-made price Proposed tariff Bicycle $240 $280 25% Washing machine $500 $560 20% Steel (1 ton) $600 $680 10% Fictional data

If the proposed tariff takes effect, what will be the new price of an imported bicycle in Dalmora?

$

Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.

Hint

Find the bicycle's imported price and tariff rate. Multiply to find the tariff, then add it to the original price.

Question 27 of 35 · Microeconomics

Dalmora's Proposed Tariffs

Dalmora is a fictional country that is considering new tariffs (taxes on imported goods). The table shows the current price of three products, both imported and made in Dalmora, and the proposed tariff rate on each imported product. Assume importers pass the full tariff on to buyers. So the new price of an imported product equals its price before the tariff plus the tariff rate times that price.

Table of prices in the fictional country of Dalmora. Bicycle: imported price before tariff 240 dollars, domestic (Dalmora-made) price 280 dollars, proposed tariff on imports 25%; Washing machine: imported price before tariff 500 dollars, domestic (Dalmora-made) price 560 dollars, proposed tariff on imports 20%; Steel (1 ton): imported price before tariff 600 dollars, domestic (Dalmora-made) price 680 dollars, proposed tariff on imports 10%. Dalmora: Current Prices and Proposed Tariffs Product Imported price (before tariff) Dalmora-made price Proposed tariff Bicycle $240 $280 25% Washing machine $500 $560 20% Steel (1 ton) $600 $680 10% Fictional data

If all three proposed tariffs take effect, for which product would the imported version still cost less than the Dalmora-made version?

Answer choices
Hint

Find the new imported price of each product, then compare it with the Dalmora-made price in the same row.

Question 28 of 35 · Key economic events in U.S. history

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff and Its Aftermath

(1) In June 1930, during the early months of the Great Depression, President Herbert Hoover signed the Tariff Act of 1930, often called the Smoot-Hawley Tariff after its two main sponsors in Congress. The law raised tariffs on thousands of imported products. Supporters hoped it would protect American farmers and factory workers from foreign competition at a time when prices and jobs were falling.

(2) Many economists warned against the law, and more than a thousand of them signed a public letter urging Hoover not to sign it. After it passed, a number of trading partners, including Canada, answered by raising their own tariffs on American goods. World trade, already shrinking because of the Depression, fell sharply over the next few years, and American exports dropped along with it. Most historians do not believe the tariff caused the Depression, but many argue that it made the downturn worse.

(3) Congress changed course in 1934. The Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act gave the President authority to negotiate agreements with individual countries to lower tariffs on both sides, within limits set by Congress. After World War II, the United States and other nations signed the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947, which lowered tariffs among many countries at once.

According to paragraph 2, what was one effect of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 2 says what happened "after it passed." Read carefully what it says about the Depression itself.

Question 29 of 35 · Fundamental economic concepts

Comparative Advantage: Arlo and Brin

Arlo and Brin are fictional countries. Each can produce wheat and machines. The table shows how much one worker can produce in one day if that worker makes only one of the two products.

Table of daily output per worker in two fictional countries. Arlo: one worker can make 12 tons of wheat or 6 machines in a day. Brin: one worker can make 4 tons of wheat or 4 machines in a day. Output of One Worker in One Day Country Wheat (tons) Machines Arlo 12 or 6 Brin 4 or 4 Fictional data. Each worker makes only one product per day.

A country has an absolute advantage in a product if it can make more of it with the same resources. A country has a comparative advantage in a product if it gives up less of the other product to make it (it has a lower opportunity cost). Economists predict that trade benefits both countries when each specializes in the product in which it has a comparative advantage.

Based on the table and the definitions, which plan would allow both countries to benefit from trade?

Answer choices
Hint

For each country, find what one machine costs in tons of wheat given up. The country that gives up less wheat per machine should make machines.

Question 30 of 35 · Key historical documents

The Homestead Act (1862)

President Abraham Lincoln signed the Homestead Act on May 20, 1862, during the Civil War. Its full title was "An Act to secure Homesteads to actual Settlers on the Public Domain." A quarter section of land was 160 acres.

(1) "That any person who is the head of a family, or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of the United States, or who shall have filed his declaration of intention to become such, as required by the naturalization laws of the United States, and who has never borne arms against the United States Government or given aid and comfort to its enemies, shall, from and after the first January, eighteen hundred and sixty-three, be entitled to enter one quarter section or a less quantity of unappropriated public lands," …

(2) … "that he, she, or they have resided upon or cultivated the same for the term of five years immediately succeeding the time of filing the affidavit aforesaid" …

Word help: declaration of intention = official papers saying a person plans to become a citizen; borne arms = fought; enter = claim; unappropriated public lands = land owned by the federal government that no one else had claimed; resided upon = lived on; cultivated = farmed.

Editor's note: Over the next several decades, settlers claimed millions of acres under the act, much of it on the Great Plains, where land was dry and had few trees. These lands had long been home to Native American nations, many of whom were forced onto reservations as settlement spread.

Based on paragraph 1, which of the following people could file a claim under the Homestead Act?

Answer choices
Hint

List the requirements in paragraph 1: age or head of family; citizenship or declaration of intention; never fought against the United States. Test each person.

Question 31 of 35 · Human migration

The Homestead Act (1862)

President Abraham Lincoln signed the Homestead Act on May 20, 1862, during the Civil War. Its full title was "An Act to secure Homesteads to actual Settlers on the Public Domain." A quarter section of land was 160 acres.

(1) "That any person who is the head of a family, or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of the United States, or who shall have filed his declaration of intention to become such, as required by the naturalization laws of the United States, and who has never borne arms against the United States Government or given aid and comfort to its enemies, shall, from and after the first January, eighteen hundred and sixty-three, be entitled to enter one quarter section or a less quantity of unappropriated public lands," …

(2) … "that he, she, or they have resided upon or cultivated the same for the term of five years immediately succeeding the time of filing the affidavit aforesaid" …

Word help: declaration of intention = official papers saying a person plans to become a citizen; borne arms = fought; enter = claim; unappropriated public lands = land owned by the federal government that no one else had claimed; resided upon = lived on; cultivated = farmed.

Editor's note: Over the next several decades, settlers claimed millions of acres under the act, much of it on the Great Plains, where land was dry and had few trees. These lands had long been home to Native American nations, many of whom were forced onto reservations as settlement spread.

How did the Homestead Act most likely affect settlement patterns in the United States?

Answer choices
Hint

What did a settler have to do to keep the land (paragraph 2)? Where was most of the public land (editor's note)?

Question 32 of 35 · Environment and societal development

Hot spot
Teller Basin: Choosing a Town Site

The schematic map shows the fictional Teller Basin in the mid-1800s, before most towns were built. Four possible town sites are marked A, B, C and D. The legend explains the symbols.

Schematic map of the fictional Teller Basin in the mid-1800s. The ocean lies along the west edge, with a harbor where the Teller River empties into it. The river flows west from the Granite Mountains in the east, through a band of fertile floodplain, to the harbor. Silver deposits are marked in the mountains. A pine forest lies north of the river, and the Dry Plains (less than 10 inches of rain a year) lie to the south. Four possible town sites: Site A in the Dry Plains, far from the river; Site B on the fertile floodplain beside the river near the harbor; Site C in the Granite Mountains next to the silver deposits; Site D in the pine forest, away from the river. Teller Basin, mid-1800s (schematic map) OCEAN Harbor Fertile floodplain Teller River Granite Mountains Pine Forest Dry Plains (less than 10 inches of rain a year) A B C D Legend Silver Mountains Town site

A group of farmers needs water for crops and wants to ship its harvest to distant markets by boat. Click the town site on the map that best meets both needs.

Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).

Schematic map of the fictional Teller Basin in the mid-1800s. The ocean lies along the west edge, with a harbor where the Teller River empties into it. The river flows west from the Granite Mountains in the east, through a band of fertile floodplain, to the harbor. Silver deposits are marked in the mountains. A pine forest lies north of the river, and the Dry Plains (less than 10 inches of rain a year) lie to the south. Four possible town sites: Site A in the Dry Plains, far from the river; Site B on the fertile floodplain beside the river near the harbor; Site C in the Granite Mountains next to the silver deposits; Site D in the pine forest, away from the river. Teller Basin, mid-1800s (schematic map) OCEAN Harbor Fertile floodplain Teller River Granite Mountains Pine Forest Dry Plains (less than 10 inches of rain a year) A B C D Legend Silver Mountains Town site
Hint

Look for a site that has fertile land and a water source, and that also connects to the harbor.

Question 33 of 35 · Environment and societal development

Teller Basin: Choosing a Town Site

The schematic map shows the fictional Teller Basin in the mid-1800s, before most towns were built. Four possible town sites are marked A, B, C and D. The legend explains the symbols.

Schematic map of the fictional Teller Basin in the mid-1800s. The ocean lies along the west edge, with a harbor where the Teller River empties into it. The river flows west from the Granite Mountains in the east, through a band of fertile floodplain, to the harbor. Silver deposits are marked in the mountains. A pine forest lies north of the river, and the Dry Plains (less than 10 inches of rain a year) lie to the south. Four possible town sites: Site A in the Dry Plains, far from the river; Site B on the fertile floodplain beside the river near the harbor; Site C in the Granite Mountains next to the silver deposits; Site D in the pine forest, away from the river. Teller Basin, mid-1800s (schematic map) OCEAN Harbor Fertile floodplain Teller River Granite Mountains Pine Forest Dry Plains (less than 10 inches of rain a year) A B C D Legend Silver Mountains Town site

A mining company chooses Site C for a new town, even though the land there is steep and poor for farming. What best explains this choice?

Answer choices
Hint

What symbol on the map appears right next to Site C? Check the legend.

Question 34 of 35 · Human migration

Drag and drop
The California Gold Rush

(1) In January 1848, a carpenter named James Marshall found gold at Sutter's Mill on the American River in California. News spread slowly at first, but by 1849 tens of thousands of people were heading west. They became known as "forty-niners."

(2) Gold seekers came from the eastern United States, Latin America, Europe, China and Australia. Some sailed around South America or crossed Panama; others traveled for months by wagon across the plains and mountains. Many left behind farms that had suffered poor harvests, or towns with few jobs. Some migrants from China were escaping war and poverty in their home regions.

(3) San Francisco grew from a small settlement of about 1,000 people in 1848 into a city of tens of thousands within a few years. Stores, banks and shipping companies sprang up to serve the miners. California became a state in 1850.

(4) The gold rush also brought great harm. Miners and settlers took over the lands of California's Native peoples, and the Native population fell sharply because of violence, disease and starvation. Mining muddied rivers and washed away hillsides. Foreign-born miners faced discrimination, including a state tax on foreign miners passed in 1850.

(5) By the mid-1850s, most of the easy-to-reach gold was gone. Many newcomers stayed anyway and turned to farming, trade or other work, and California's population kept growing.

Drag each factor into the correct category for people who moved to California during the gold rush.

Push factors (reasons to leave home)Pull factors (reasons to come to California)

Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.

Hint

A push factor is a problem at home that drives people away. A pull factor is an attraction that draws people to a new place.

Question 35 of 35 · Human migration

The California Gold Rush

(1) In January 1848, a carpenter named James Marshall found gold at Sutter's Mill on the American River in California. News spread slowly at first, but by 1849 tens of thousands of people were heading west. They became known as "forty-niners."

(2) Gold seekers came from the eastern United States, Latin America, Europe, China and Australia. Some sailed around South America or crossed Panama; others traveled for months by wagon across the plains and mountains. Many left behind farms that had suffered poor harvests, or towns with few jobs. Some migrants from China were escaping war and poverty in their home regions.

(3) San Francisco grew from a small settlement of about 1,000 people in 1848 into a city of tens of thousands within a few years. Stores, banks and shipping companies sprang up to serve the miners. California became a state in 1850.

(4) The gold rush also brought great harm. Miners and settlers took over the lands of California's Native peoples, and the Native population fell sharply because of violence, disease and starvation. Mining muddied rivers and washed away hillsides. Foreign-born miners faced discrimination, including a state tax on foreign miners passed in 1850.

(5) By the mid-1850s, most of the easy-to-reach gold was gone. Many newcomers stayed anyway and turned to farming, trade or other work, and California's population kept growing.

Which conclusion about the effects of the gold rush is best supported by the passage?

Answer choices
Hint

A good conclusion must fit everything the passage says. Check each choice for anything that contradicts the text.