This is an estimate based on your percent correct on our practice tests. The official GED score conversion is not public, so your real score may differ. Scores of 145+ pass; 165+ is College Ready.
Question 1 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
Two Levels of Government
Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause), 1787
(1) "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
Source 2: James Madison, The Federalist No. 45, 1788
Madison wrote this essay to persuade New Yorkers to ratify the proposed Constitution.
(2) "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."
Read both sources in "Two Levels of Government."
Taken together, the two sources describe which principle of the U.S. Constitution?
Hint
Both sources talk about the national (federal) government and the State governments. What principle describes how power is shared between those two levels?
Step-by-step solution
Source 1 (the Supremacy Clause) explains what happens when national and state law conflict: national law is "the supreme Law of the Land," and judges "in every State shall be bound thereby." Source 2 (Madison, Federalist No. 45) describes how power is split: federal powers are "few and defined," while those that "remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite."
Step by step:
Identify the two actors in both sources: the federal (national) government and the State governments.
Ask which principle is about dividing power between levels of government. That is federalism.
Separation of powers and checks and balances deal with the three branches; popular sovereignty deals with the source of power; judicial review deals with courts.
Correct answer: Federalism, the division of power between the national government and the states.
Tip: On the GED, "levels" (national vs. state) signals federalism; "branches" (Congress, President, courts) signals separation of powers.
Question 2 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Two Levels of Government
Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause), 1787
(1) "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."
Source 2: James Madison, The Federalist No. 45, 1788
Madison wrote this essay to persuade New Yorkers to ratify the proposed Constitution.
(2) "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."
A state passes a law allowing farmers to use a certain pesticide. A valid federal law, passed under Congress's constitutional powers, bans that pesticide nationwide. A farmer in the state is charged with violating the federal law and argues that the state law protects him.
Based on Source 1, how should a judge rule?
Hint
Look at the end of Source 1: what must judges do when a state law says the opposite of a valid federal law?
Step-by-step solution
Source 1 says that federal laws "made in Pursuance" of the Constitution are "the supreme Law of the Land," and that judges "in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding." Notwithstanding means "in spite of."
Step by step:
The stem tells you the federal law is valid (passed under Congress's constitutional powers), so it meets the "in Pursuance thereof" condition.
The state law says the opposite—it is "to the Contrary."
The Supremacy Clause tells judges to follow the federal law in spite of the state law.
Madison's comment about state powers (Source 2) is true but does not settle a direct conflict.
Correct answer: Against the farmer, because a valid federal law is supreme over a conflicting state law.
Tip: When two sources are given, decide which one actually answers the question asked. A true statement from the wrong source is a common GED trap.
Question 3 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Drag and drop
Under the U.S. Constitution, some powers belong only to the national government (delegated powers), some are kept by the states (reserved powers), and some are shared by both (concurrent powers).
Drag each power into the correct category.
Delegated (national only)
Reserved (states)
Concurrent (shared)
Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.
Hint
Ask: Could a state do this on its own? If two states doing it differently would cause national chaos (money, treaties), it is delegated. If both levels clearly do it, it is concurrent.
Step-by-step solution
Delegated powers are listed for the national government in Article I, Section 8 and elsewhere, and states are barred from using some of them. Article I, Section 10 says no state shall "coin Money" or "enter into any Treaty." So printing and coining money and making treaties are national only.
Reserved powers come from the Tenth Amendment: powers not given to the national government stay with the states. Running public schools and issuing marriage licenses are classic state powers.
Concurrent powers are used by both levels. Both the national government and the states collect taxes, and both set up their own court systems.
Correct placement: Delegated: print and coin money; make treaties. Reserved: public schools; marriage licenses. Concurrent: collect taxes; create courts.
Tip: A quick test: if you can picture both a state office and a federal office doing it (taxes, courts, borrowing money, making laws), it is concurrent.
Question 4 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction
Lincoln's First Inaugural Address (1861)
Editor's note: When Abraham Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861, seven Southern states had already declared that they were leaving the Union and had formed the Confederate States of America. Lincoln spoke directly to them in his first speech as president.
(1) "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."
(2) "Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy."
(3) "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors."
(4) "I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection."
Editor's note: About five weeks later, on April 12, 1861, Confederate forces opened fire on Fort Sumter, a U.S. Army fort in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. The Civil War had begun.
Which statement best summarizes Lincoln's position in March 1861, as shown in paragraphs 1 and 2 together?
Hint
Paragraph 1 is about slavery; paragraph 2 is about secession. Find the choice that gets BOTH right.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 1: "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists." Paragraph 2: "Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy."
Step by step:
Paragraph 1 → Lincoln promised not to interfere with slavery where it already existed (he even said he had "no lawful right" to do so).
Paragraph 2 → he called secession "anarchy," meaning he did not accept it as legal.
Only one choice combines "won't interfere with slavery where it exists" + "won't accept secession."
The choice about abolishing slavery everywhere reflects what happened later (the Thirteenth Amendment, 1865), not his stated position in 1861.
Correct answer: He would not interfere with slavery where it already existed, but he would not accept secession.
Tip: Avoid hindsight: answer from what the document says at its own date, not from what you know happened later.
Question 5 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction
Lincoln's First Inaugural Address (1861)
Editor's note: When Abraham Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861, seven Southern states had already declared that they were leaving the Union and had formed the Confederate States of America. Lincoln spoke directly to them in his first speech as president.
(1) "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."
(2) "Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy."
(3) "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors."
(4) "I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection."
Editor's note: About five weeks later, on April 12, 1861, Confederate forces opened fire on Fort Sumter, a U.S. Army fort in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. The Civil War had begun.
What is Lincoln's main purpose in paragraph 3?
Hint
Who does Lincoln say holds "the momentous issue of civil war"? Who would be "the aggressors"?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 3: "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors."
Step by step:
"Assail" means attack. Lincoln promises the federal government will not attack.
"Aggressors" are the ones who start a fight. He says the South can have a war only by starting it.
So his purpose is to put the decision—and the blame—for any war on the seceding states.
The editor's note confirms what followed: Confederate forces fired the first shots at Fort Sumter.
Correct answer: To state that the federal government would not strike first, so any war would be started by the seceding states.
Tip: For purpose questions, look for who the speaker is addressing and what he wants them to think or do. Unfamiliar words (assail, aggressors) can usually be figured out from context.
Question 6 of 35 · Development of classical civilizations
Two Empires and Their Frontiers
(1) About 2,000 years ago, two great empires ruled at opposite ends of Asia and Europe. The Roman Empire surrounded the Mediterranean Sea. In East Asia, the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) ruled China. Each empire governed tens of millions of people spread across huge distances.
(2) Ruling so much land was a constant challenge. Both empires built networks of roads so that armies, government officials, messengers, and merchants could move quickly from the capital to distant provinces. Roman roads eventually stretched for tens of thousands of miles. Han China also built roads and canals. Trade routes later called the Silk Road carried Chinese silk west across Central Asia. Rome and Han China never conquered each other or exchanged regular official visits, but through many middlemen, Chinese silk reached the markets of Rome.
(3) Each empire also tried to tie its people together with shared systems. The Romans spread the Latin language, Roman law, and Roman coins. Han emperors used a single written language for government records and trained officials in Confucian teachings at an imperial academy.
(4) Both empires faced threats from peoples living beyond their frontiers. Han emperors repaired and extended long walls begun by earlier rulers to guard against the Xiongnu, nomadic horse riders from the northern grasslands. In Britain, the Roman emperor Hadrian ordered a stone wall built across the island beginning around 122 CE; it ran about 73 miles. Soldiers stationed along these walls watched for raiders, and gates let them inspect travelers and collect taxes on goods passing through.
(5) Neither wall sealed its empire off. Raiders sometimes broke through, and trade continued across both frontiers. Instead, the walls marked where the emperor's direct control ended—a visible line between "inside" and "outside" the empire.
(6) Both empires eventually broke apart. The Han dynasty ended in 220 CE, and the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed in 476 CE.
According to paragraph 2, why did both the Roman Empire and Han China build road networks?
Hint
Paragraph 2 lists who used the roads and why speed mattered.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 2 explains the problem ("Ruling so much land was a constant challenge") and the solution: "Both empires built networks of roads so that armies, government officials, messengers, and merchants could move quickly from the capital to distant provinces."
Step by step:
Find the sentence in paragraph 2 that begins "Both empires built networks of roads…"
The words "so that" introduce the reason.
Match the reason to a choice: moving people and goods quickly over large areas.
The other choices mix up roads with walls (paragraphs 4–5) or exaggerate contact between Rome and China.
Correct answer: To move armies, officials, messengers, and merchants quickly across large territories.
Tip: Signal words like so that, because, and in order to point straight at the reason a question asks for.
Question 7 of 35 · Development of classical civilizations
Two Empires and Their Frontiers
(1) About 2,000 years ago, two great empires ruled at opposite ends of Asia and Europe. The Roman Empire surrounded the Mediterranean Sea. In East Asia, the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) ruled China. Each empire governed tens of millions of people spread across huge distances.
(2) Ruling so much land was a constant challenge. Both empires built networks of roads so that armies, government officials, messengers, and merchants could move quickly from the capital to distant provinces. Roman roads eventually stretched for tens of thousands of miles. Han China also built roads and canals. Trade routes later called the Silk Road carried Chinese silk west across Central Asia. Rome and Han China never conquered each other or exchanged regular official visits, but through many middlemen, Chinese silk reached the markets of Rome.
(3) Each empire also tried to tie its people together with shared systems. The Romans spread the Latin language, Roman law, and Roman coins. Han emperors used a single written language for government records and trained officials in Confucian teachings at an imperial academy.
(4) Both empires faced threats from peoples living beyond their frontiers. Han emperors repaired and extended long walls begun by earlier rulers to guard against the Xiongnu, nomadic horse riders from the northern grasslands. In Britain, the Roman emperor Hadrian ordered a stone wall built across the island beginning around 122 CE; it ran about 73 miles. Soldiers stationed along these walls watched for raiders, and gates let them inspect travelers and collect taxes on goods passing through.
(5) Neither wall sealed its empire off. Raiders sometimes broke through, and trade continued across both frontiers. Instead, the walls marked where the emperor's direct control ended—a visible line between "inside" and "outside" the empire.
(6) Both empires eventually broke apart. The Han dynasty ended in 220 CE, and the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed in 476 CE.
Which comparison of the Roman Empire and Han China is best supported by the passage as a whole?
Hint
Check each choice against a specific paragraph. Watch for words that go further than the passage, such as "directly" or "only."
Step-by-step solution
The correct choice draws on several paragraphs: paragraph 2 ("Ruling so much land was a constant challenge" for both), paragraph 4 ("Both empires faced threats from peoples living beyond their frontiers"), and paragraph 2 again ("through many middlemen, Chinese silk reached the markets of Rome")—an indirect trade link.
Step by step:
Test the "traded directly" choice against paragraph 2: contradicted (no regular official visits; middlemen).
Test the "Rome relied only on its armies" choice against paragraph 4: contradicted (Hadrian's Wall).
Test the "Han dynasty lasted longer" choice: the passage never compares how long each empire lasted or explains why the Han lasted; it only gives end dates.
The remaining choice matches several paragraphs without adding anything new.
Correct answer: Both empires faced similar problems—governing huge areas and defending frontiers—and both were linked indirectly by trade.
Tip: For "best supported" questions, the right answer is often the most carefully worded one. Choices with directly, only, or a cause the passage never states are usually traps.
Question 8 of 35 · Borders between peoples and nations
Two Empires and Their Frontiers
(1) About 2,000 years ago, two great empires ruled at opposite ends of Asia and Europe. The Roman Empire surrounded the Mediterranean Sea. In East Asia, the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) ruled China. Each empire governed tens of millions of people spread across huge distances.
(2) Ruling so much land was a constant challenge. Both empires built networks of roads so that armies, government officials, messengers, and merchants could move quickly from the capital to distant provinces. Roman roads eventually stretched for tens of thousands of miles. Han China also built roads and canals. Trade routes later called the Silk Road carried Chinese silk west across Central Asia. Rome and Han China never conquered each other or exchanged regular official visits, but through many middlemen, Chinese silk reached the markets of Rome.
(3) Each empire also tried to tie its people together with shared systems. The Romans spread the Latin language, Roman law, and Roman coins. Han emperors used a single written language for government records and trained officials in Confucian teachings at an imperial academy.
(4) Both empires faced threats from peoples living beyond their frontiers. Han emperors repaired and extended long walls begun by earlier rulers to guard against the Xiongnu, nomadic horse riders from the northern grasslands. In Britain, the Roman emperor Hadrian ordered a stone wall built across the island beginning around 122 CE; it ran about 73 miles. Soldiers stationed along these walls watched for raiders, and gates let them inspect travelers and collect taxes on goods passing through.
(5) Neither wall sealed its empire off. Raiders sometimes broke through, and trade continued across both frontiers. Instead, the walls marked where the emperor's direct control ended—a visible line between "inside" and "outside" the empire.
(6) Both empires eventually broke apart. The Han dynasty ended in 220 CE, and the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed in 476 CE.
Based on paragraphs 4 and 5, what was the main function of frontier walls such as Hadrian's Wall?
Hint
Paragraph 5 tells you what the walls did NOT do. Use that to eliminate choices.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 4 says soldiers on the walls "watched for raiders, and gates let them inspect travelers and collect taxes on goods passing through." Paragraph 5 adds: "Neither wall sealed its empire off… Instead, the walls marked where the emperor's direct control ended."
Step by step:
Paragraph 5 rules out the idea that walls stopped all movement.
Paragraph 4 shows the walls were used to watch and control crossings (inspect travelers, tax goods).
Paragraph 5 adds that they marked the limit of imperial control.
Combine both: mark the edge + regulate crossings.
Correct answer: To mark the edge of the empire's control and to watch and regulate who and what crossed it.
Tip: Absolute words such as all, every, and never in an answer choice are red flags—check whether the passage really goes that far.
Question 9 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
An Independent Judiciary
Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 1, 1787
(1) "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."
Source 2: Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 78, 1788
(2) "Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."
(3) "… nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office …"
The phrase "during good Behavior" in Source 1 and Hamilton's phrase "permanency in office" in paragraph 3 both support which feature of the federal courts?
Hint
"During good Behavior" means as long as they behave properly—there is no set term. Why would that matter for a judge?
Step-by-step solution
Source 1: judges "shall hold their Offices during good Behavior" and their pay "shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office." Paragraph 3 (Hamilton): "nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office."
Step by step:
"During good Behavior" = no fixed term; in practice, federal judges usually serve for life unless impeached and removed.
Hamilton connects permanent tenure to the judiciary's "firmness and independence."
A judge who cannot be fired or have pay cut for an unpopular ruling is free to decide cases on the law.
The wrong choices either invent elections or describe exactly the pressures the Constitution blocks.
Correct answer: Judges can serve without a fixed term, so they can decide cases independently without fear of losing their jobs.
Tip: When two sources share an idea, the question usually asks for the principle behind both—here, judicial independence.
Question 10 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
An Independent Judiciary
Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 1, 1787
(1) "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."
Source 2: Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 78, 1788
(2) "Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."
(3) "… nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office …"
In paragraph 2, Hamilton writes that the judiciary "must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."
Which event from U.S. history best illustrates this idea?
Hint
"Efficacy" means effectiveness. Which choice shows a court ruling that needed the President's power to actually take effect?
Step-by-step solution
Hamilton argues the courts have "no influence over either the sword or the purse"—no army and no money. They have "merely judgment," so they "must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm" to make rulings effective.
Step by step:
Restate the idea: courts decide, but the executive branch must enforce.
Look for an event where a court ruling could not take effect until the executive acted.
After the Supreme Court's Brown v. Board of Education (1954) ruling, a federal court ordered Central High School in Little Rock to admit Black students. When state officials and crowds blocked them, President Eisenhower sent federal troops in 1957. The ruling became effective only with executive force—"the sword."
The other choices show judgment alone, the purse, or the Senate's confirmation power.
Correct answer: In 1957, President Eisenhower sent federal troops to Little Rock, Arkansas, to carry out a court order to desegregate a high school.
Tip: Application questions ask you to match an abstract principle to a concrete example. Restate the principle in plain words first, then test each example.
Question 11 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Hot spotHow Cases Reach the Supreme Court
(1) The United States has two court systems: a federal system and a separate system in each state. Most cases begin in a trial court, where witnesses testify and a judge or jury decides the facts. A party that loses can usually appeal to a higher court, which reviews whether the law was applied correctly.
(2) The U.S. Supreme Court sits at the top of both systems. It can review decisions of the federal courts of appeals. It can also review a decision of a state's highest court, but only when the case involves the U.S. Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty (a "federal question").
(3) The Supreme Court chooses most of the cases it hears. A party asks the Court to take its case by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari. The Court receives thousands of these petitions each year but usually agrees to hear fewer than 100 cases. By long tradition, the Court accepts a case if at least four of the nine justices vote to hear it. This custom is called the "rule of four." When the Court refuses to hear a case, the decision of the lower court stands.
A company loses a lawsuit over a federal law in a U.S. District Court. The company appeals and loses again.
Click the court in the flowchart that the company could ask to review the case next.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Follow the arrows in the federal system. Where does a District Court case go on appeal, and where does it go after that?
Step-by-step solution
The flowchart's federal column shows: U.S. District Court → (appeal) → U.S. Court of Appeals → (appeal) → U.S. Supreme Court. Paragraph 2 confirms that the Supreme Court "can review decisions of the federal courts of appeals."
Step by step:
The case began in the U.S. District Court (federal trial court).
The first appeal goes to the U.S. Court of Appeals, where the company lost again.
The only court above the Court of Appeals is the U.S. Supreme Court. The company would file a petition for a writ of certiorari (paragraph 3).
State courts are a separate system; a federal case does not move into them.
Correct answer: the U.S. Supreme Court box.
Tip: In a flowchart, trace each step in order and count the steps in the stem. "Appeals and loses again" means you must move two steps up, not one.
Question 12 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
How Cases Reach the Supreme Court
(1) The United States has two court systems: a federal system and a separate system in each state. Most cases begin in a trial court, where witnesses testify and a judge or jury decides the facts. A party that loses can usually appeal to a higher court, which reviews whether the law was applied correctly.
(2) The U.S. Supreme Court sits at the top of both systems. It can review decisions of the federal courts of appeals. It can also review a decision of a state's highest court, but only when the case involves the U.S. Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty (a "federal question").
(3) The Supreme Court chooses most of the cases it hears. A party asks the Court to take its case by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari. The Court receives thousands of these petitions each year but usually agrees to hear fewer than 100 cases. By long tradition, the Court accepts a case if at least four of the nine justices vote to hear it. This custom is called the "rule of four." When the Court refuses to hear a case, the decision of the lower court stands.
A petition for a writ of certiorari reaches the Supreme Court. Four justices vote to hear the case, and five justices vote not to hear it.
Based on the passage, what happens next?
Hint
Reread the sentence about the "rule of four." Does a case need a majority to be heard?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 3: "By long tradition, the Court accepts a case if at least four of the nine justices vote to hear it. This custom is called the 'rule of four.'"
Step by step:
Count the votes to hear the case: 4.
The rule requires at least four—not a majority of five.
Four meets the requirement, so the Court takes the case.
Deciding the case itself will later require a majority, but accepting it does not.
Correct answer: The Court hears the case, because at least four justices voted to hear it.
Tip: Do not assume "majority rules" everywhere. GED questions often test a specific rule stated in the passage—read the number carefully.
Question 13 of 35 · Key economic events in U.S. history
The Federal Reserve: Why It Exists and How It Decides
(1) Before 1913, the United States had no central bank. Banking "panics" struck again and again. In a panic, worried depositors rushed to withdraw their money all at once, and even healthy banks could run out of cash. During the Panic of 1907, banks failed and loans dried up until a group of private bankers led by J. P. Morgan organized a rescue.
(2) Congress responded with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The law's title described its goals: "An Act To provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." An elastic currency is a money supply that can stretch when the economy needs more money—during a panic, for example—and shrink when it needs less.
(3) The Federal Reserve System (the "Fed") has a Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., and 12 regional Reserve Banks. The seven governors are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 14-year terms. Decisions about interest rates are made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which meets eight times a year. Its 12 voting members are the seven governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the other eleven Reserve Bank presidents, who take turns.
(4) Since 1977, federal law has directed the Fed to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. The FOMC's main tool is its target for the federal funds rate, the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans. When the FOMC raises its target, interest rates on mortgages, car loans, and business loans tend to rise. Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows—though unemployment may rise. When the FOMC lowers its target, the opposite tends to happen.
(5) Long, overlapping terms are meant to make the Fed independent, so that its decisions are not driven by the next election. Supporters say this independence helps keep inflation under control. Critics argue that officials who are not elected should not hold so much power over the economy.
Based on paragraphs 1 and 2, Congress created the Federal Reserve mainly to
Hint
Paragraph 1 describes a problem; paragraph 2 describes the solution. Match the solution to the problem.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 1 describes the problem: repeated panics in which "even healthy banks could run out of cash." Paragraph 2 quotes the law's goals: "to furnish an elastic currency" and "to establish a more effective supervision of banking," and explains that an elastic currency "can stretch when the economy needs more money—during a panic, for example."
Step by step:
Problem: banks ran short of cash during panics.
Solution 1: an elastic currency—more money available in a crisis.
Solution 2: better supervision of banks.
Both aim at a more stable banking system.
Correct answer: make the banking system more stable by allowing the money supply to expand in a crisis and by supervising banks more closely.
Tip: Problem–solution passages are common on the GED. When asked why something was created, find the problem it was meant to fix.
Question 14 of 35 · Macroeconomics
The Federal Reserve: Why It Exists and How It Decides
(1) Before 1913, the United States had no central bank. Banking "panics" struck again and again. In a panic, worried depositors rushed to withdraw their money all at once, and even healthy banks could run out of cash. During the Panic of 1907, banks failed and loans dried up until a group of private bankers led by J. P. Morgan organized a rescue.
(2) Congress responded with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The law's title described its goals: "An Act To provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." An elastic currency is a money supply that can stretch when the economy needs more money—during a panic, for example—and shrink when it needs less.
(3) The Federal Reserve System (the "Fed") has a Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., and 12 regional Reserve Banks. The seven governors are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 14-year terms. Decisions about interest rates are made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which meets eight times a year. Its 12 voting members are the seven governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the other eleven Reserve Bank presidents, who take turns.
(4) Since 1977, federal law has directed the Fed to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. The FOMC's main tool is its target for the federal funds rate, the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans. When the FOMC raises its target, interest rates on mortgages, car loans, and business loans tend to rise. Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows—though unemployment may rise. When the FOMC lowers its target, the opposite tends to happen.
(5) Long, overlapping terms are meant to make the Fed independent, so that its decisions are not driven by the next election. Supporters say this independence helps keep inflation under control. Critics argue that officials who are not elected should not hold so much power over the economy.
Inflation is high and rising. According to paragraph 4, what action would the FOMC most likely take?
Hint
Which change in the federal funds rate makes borrowing more expensive and slows spending?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 4: "When the FOMC raises its target, interest rates on mortgages, car loans, and business loans tend to rise. Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows."
Step by step:
The goal is to slow inflation (stable prices is one of the Fed's two goals).
Slowing inflation requires less spending.
Higher interest rates reduce borrowing and spending.
So the FOMC would raise its target.
Taxes and highway spending are fiscal policy, which the Fed does not control.
Correct answer: Raise its target for the federal funds rate.
Tip: Remember the pattern: inflation too high → Fed raises rates; recession or high unemployment → Fed lowers rates.
Question 15 of 35 · Macroeconomics
Drop-downThe Federal Reserve: Why It Exists and How It Decides
(1) Before 1913, the United States had no central bank. Banking "panics" struck again and again. In a panic, worried depositors rushed to withdraw their money all at once, and even healthy banks could run out of cash. During the Panic of 1907, banks failed and loans dried up until a group of private bankers led by J. P. Morgan organized a rescue.
(2) Congress responded with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The law's title described its goals: "An Act To provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." An elastic currency is a money supply that can stretch when the economy needs more money—during a panic, for example—and shrink when it needs less.
(3) The Federal Reserve System (the "Fed") has a Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., and 12 regional Reserve Banks. The seven governors are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 14-year terms. Decisions about interest rates are made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which meets eight times a year. Its 12 voting members are the seven governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the other eleven Reserve Bank presidents, who take turns.
(4) Since 1977, federal law has directed the Fed to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. The FOMC's main tool is its target for the federal funds rate, the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans. When the FOMC raises its target, interest rates on mortgages, car loans, and business loans tend to rise. Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows—though unemployment may rise. When the FOMC lowers its target, the opposite tends to happen.
(5) Long, overlapping terms are meant to make the Fed independent, so that its decisions are not driven by the next election. Supporters say this independence helps keep inflation under control. Critics argue that officials who are not elected should not hold so much power over the economy.
The FOMC votes to lower its target for the federal funds rate. Complete the chain of likely effects.
Loans for homes, cars, and businesses become . As a result, spending by households and businesses tends to . Unemployment then tends to . The main risk of keeping rates low for too long is .
Choose an answer from each menu.
Hint
Paragraph 4 describes what happens when rates go UP. Lowering rates causes "the opposite." Reverse each step.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 4 describes a rate increase: "Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows—though unemployment may rise." It then says: "When the FOMC lowers its target, the opposite tends to happen."
Step by step (reverse each link):
More expensive borrowing → cheaper borrowing.
Spend less → spending tends to increase.
Unemployment may rise → unemployment tends to fall (businesses hire to meet demand).
Inflation slows → the risk is rising inflation if too much money chases goods.
Tip: When a passage explains one direction of a cause-and-effect chain and says "the opposite" for the other, write the chain out and flip every arrow. Keep fiscal policy (taxes, spending, deficits) separate from monetary policy (interest rates, money supply).
Question 16 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
The President nominates justices to the Supreme Court, but the Senate must vote to confirm them before they can serve.
This arrangement is an example of which constitutional principle?
Hint
One branch acts, and another branch can approve or block that action.
Step-by-step solution
Under Article II, the President appoints Supreme Court justices "by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate." One branch (the executive) chooses, and part of another branch (the legislature) must approve. Each branch can limit the other.
Step by step:
Identify the actors: the President (executive branch) and the Senate (legislative branch).
Identify the relationship: the Senate can block the President's choice.
A branch limiting another branch's power = checks and balances.
Federalism involves levels of government; judicial review involves courts; popular sovereignty involves the people.
Correct answer: Checks and balances.
Tip: Other common checks on the GED: the presidential veto, Congress overriding a veto with a two-thirds vote, impeachment, and judicial review.
Question 17 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction
Hot spotFrom Election to Abolition, 1860–1865
(1) President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a war measure. It declared enslaved people free only in areas that were still in rebellion against the United States. It did not apply to slave states that had stayed loyal to the Union, such as Kentucky and Delaware. Because the Proclamation rested on the president's wartime powers, many people worried that courts might overturn it once the fighting stopped.
(2) Supporters of abolition therefore pushed for a change to the Constitution itself, which no single court ruling or future president could undo.
Click the event on the timeline that ended slavery everywhere in the United States, including in slave states that had stayed loyal to the Union.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Paragraph 1 explains why the Emancipation Proclamation did not reach every state. Paragraph 2 says what supporters of abolition pushed for instead.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 1 says the Emancipation Proclamation freed enslaved people "only in areas that were still in rebellion" and "did not apply to slave states that had stayed loyal to the Union, such as Kentucky and Delaware." Paragraph 2 says abolitionists "pushed for a change to the Constitution itself."
Step by step:
The question asks about slavery ending everywhere, including loyal states.
The Emancipation Proclamation (January 1863) is a trap—it covered only rebel-held areas.
A change to the Constitution = an amendment. The timeline shows the Thirteenth Amendment ratified in December 1865.
Lee's surrender ended the main fighting but did not, by itself, abolish slavery.
Correct answer: December 1865, Thirteenth Amendment ratified.
Tip: The GED often tests the difference between the Emancipation Proclamation (a limited wartime order) and the Thirteenth Amendment (a permanent, nationwide ban on slavery).
Question 18 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction
Drag and drop
Drag each event into the period in which it happened.
Rising tensions before the war (1850–1860)
Reconstruction (1865–1877)
Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.
Hint
Before the war, the fights were about whether slavery would spread into new territories. After the war, the questions were about the rights of freed people and how to rebuild the South.
Step-by-step solution
Rising tensions, 1850–1860: the Fugitive Slave Act was part of the Compromise of 1850; the Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) applied "popular sovereignty" and led to violence in Kansas; the Dred Scott decision (1857) said Congress could not ban slavery in the territories and that Black Americans could not be citizens. All three deepened the conflict over the spread of slavery.
Reconstruction, 1865–1877: right after the war, Southern states passed Black Codes (1865–1866) to control freed people's labor and movement. Congress responded with the Fourteenth Amendment (ratified 1868). Reconstruction ended when federal troops were withdrawn from the South in 1877.
Correct placement: Before the war: Fugitive Slave Act, Kansas-Nebraska Act, Dred Scott. Reconstruction: Black Codes, Fourteenth Amendment, withdrawal of troops.
Tip: Use the topic of each event as a clue when dates are missing: arguments about slavery in the territories = before the war; rights of freed people = Reconstruction.
Question 19 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities
Does the Bill of Rights Limit the States?
(1) When the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in 1791, it limited only the national government. In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court confirmed that the Bill of Rights did not apply to state governments. A state could, in theory, limit speech or search homes in ways Congress could not.
(2) The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, changed this. It says that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Over many decades, the Supreme Court ruled that the "liberty" protected by this Due Process Clause includes most of the rights listed in the Bill of Rights. Because the Court applied these rights to the states one at a time, the process is called selective incorporation.
(3) Some key steps:
Gitlow v. New York (1925): The Court accepted that freedom of speech and of the press are protected against state governments, not just the national government.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Evidence gathered in an illegal search may not be used in a state criminal trial.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): A state must provide a lawyer to a person charged with a serious crime who cannot afford one.
(4) Incorporation is not complete. The Court has never required states to follow the Fifth Amendment's rule that serious federal charges begin with a grand jury indictment, or the Seventh Amendment's right to a jury in civil lawsuits (disputes over money or property). States may use their own procedures for these.
According to the passage, which part of the Constitution allowed the Supreme Court to apply most of the Bill of Rights to state governments?
Hint
Paragraph 2 quotes the clause and names it.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 2 quotes the Fourteenth Amendment—no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"—and explains that the Court ruled "the 'liberty' protected by this Due Process Clause includes most of the rights listed in the Bill of Rights."
Step by step:
Paragraph 1: originally, the Bill of Rights limited only the national government (Barron v. Baltimore, 1833).
Paragraph 2: the Fourteenth Amendment (1868) limits what states may do.
The Court read "liberty" in its Due Process Clause to include Bill of Rights protections.
That process is selective incorporation.
Correct answer: The Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Tip: Separate the tool (the clause) from the result (the rights applied). Questions often offer a result as a trap answer.
Question 20 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities
Select allDoes the Bill of Rights Limit the States?
(1) When the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in 1791, it limited only the national government. In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court confirmed that the Bill of Rights did not apply to state governments. A state could, in theory, limit speech or search homes in ways Congress could not.
(2) The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, changed this. It says that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Over many decades, the Supreme Court ruled that the "liberty" protected by this Due Process Clause includes most of the rights listed in the Bill of Rights. Because the Court applied these rights to the states one at a time, the process is called selective incorporation.
(3) Some key steps:
Gitlow v. New York (1925): The Court accepted that freedom of speech and of the press are protected against state governments, not just the national government.
Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Evidence gathered in an illegal search may not be used in a state criminal trial.
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): A state must provide a lawyer to a person charged with a serious crime who cannot afford one.
(4) Incorporation is not complete. The Court has never required states to follow the Fifth Amendment's rule that serious federal charges begin with a grand jury indictment, or the Seventh Amendment's right to a jury in civil lawsuits (disputes over money or property). States may use their own procedures for these.
Based on the passage, which of the following actions by a state government would most likely be ruled unconstitutional today?
Select all that apply.
Select all that apply.
Hint
Match each action to a case in paragraph 3. Then check paragraph 4 for rights that have NOT been applied to the states.
Step-by-step solution
Use the cases in paragraph 3 and the exceptions in paragraph 4.
Lawyer refused for a poor defendant (armed robbery):Gideon v. Wainwright—"A state must provide a lawyer to a person charged with a serious crime who cannot afford one." → unconstitutional.
Illegal-search evidence:Mapp v. Ohio—"Evidence gathered in an illegal search may not be used in a state criminal trial." → unconstitutional.
Jailing an editor for criticism:Gitlow—"freedom of speech and of the press are protected against state governments." → unconstitutional.
No grand jury: paragraph 4 says the Court "has never required states to follow the Fifth Amendment's rule" on grand juries. → allowed.
Civil case without a jury: paragraph 4 says the same for "the Seventh Amendment's right to a jury in civil lawsuits." → allowed.
Correct answers: the lawyer refusal, the illegal-search evidence, and jailing the editor.
Tip: In select-all questions, judge each choice on its own against the text. Watch for exceptions—here, paragraph 4 tells you incorporation "is not complete."
Question 21 of 35 · Macroeconomics
Fighting Inflation, 1979–1984
(1) By 1979, prices in the United States had been rising rapidly for most of the decade. In August 1979, Paul Volcker became chair of the Federal Reserve. Under his leadership, the Fed sharply limited the growth of the money supply, and interest rates climbed to the highest levels in modern U.S. history.
(2) The graph shows three yearly averages: the inflation rate (the rise in consumer prices), the unemployment rate, and the federal funds rate (the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans, which the Fed influences).
Which conclusion is best supported by the graph?
Hint
Trace each line separately. When did the federal funds rate peak? What happened to inflation and unemployment in the next year or two?
In the next two years, inflation dropped from 10.3% to 3.2%.
Unemployment climbed to its highest point, 9.7%, in 1982.
Check the traps: unemployment did not fall 1979–1982; rates rose before inflation fell; the two did not always move together.
Correct answer: After the federal funds rate peaked in 1981, inflation fell sharply, while unemployment rose to its highest level of the period in 1982.
Tip: With multi-line graphs, use the legend and markers to keep each line straight. Write down the peak and low year for each line before reading the choices.
Question 22 of 35 · Macroeconomics
Fill inFighting Inflation, 1979–1984
(1) By 1979, prices in the United States had been rising rapidly for most of the decade. In August 1979, Paul Volcker became chair of the Federal Reserve. Under his leadership, the Fed sharply limited the growth of the money supply, and interest rates climbed to the highest levels in modern U.S. history.
(2) The graph shows three yearly averages: the inflation rate (the rise in consumer prices), the unemployment rate, and the federal funds rate (the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans, which the Fed influences).
Use the graph. By how many percentage points did the inflation rate fall from 1980 to 1983?
percentage points
Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.
Hint
Read the inflation line (solid line, circle markers) at 1980 and at 1983, then subtract.
Step-by-step solution
Read the inflation line (solid, circle markers): 13.5% in 1980 and 3.2% in 1983.
Step by step:
A change in percentage points is a simple subtraction of two percents.
13.5 - 3.2 = 10.3
The inflation rate fell by 10.3 percentage points.
Do not compute a percent change here: \dfrac{10.3}{13.5} \approx 76\% answers a different question ("by what percent did the rate fall?").
Be sure you read the inflation line, not the federal funds rate (13.4 in 1980, 9.1 in 1983) or unemployment.
Correct answer: 10.3 percentage points.
Tip: "Percentage points" = subtract the two rates. "Percent change" = (change ÷ original) × 100. The GED uses both, so read the wording carefully.
Question 23 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments
Three Ways to Divide Power
(1) Every country must decide how power is shared between its central government and its regional or local governments.
(2) In a unitary system, the central government holds supreme power. It can create regional and local governments, decide what powers they have, change their borders, or abolish them. France and Japan are unitary states.
(3) In a federal system, a written constitution divides power between the national government and state or provincial governments. Neither level can abolish the other, and each governs citizens directly. The United States, Canada, Mexico, and India have federal systems.
(4) In a confederation, independent states join together but keep most of the power. The central government is weak and depends on the member states for money and soldiers. The United States under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) was a confederation.
In the fictional nation of Corland, the national parliament passed a law that merged 22 regions into 13 larger regions and moved some of the regions' powers to the national government. The regional governments had no legal way to block the change.
Based on the passage, Corland most likely has which system of government?
Hint
Which system lets the central government change regional borders, change their powers, or abolish them?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 2 says that in a unitary system the central government "can create regional and local governments, decide what powers they have, change their borders, or abolish them." The diagram shows the central government "creates, grants powers to, can abolish" regional governments.
Step by step:
Corland's national parliament redrew the regions (changed borders) and took some of their powers.
The regions could not block it—so the central government holds supreme power.
In a federal system, "Neither level can abolish the other" (paragraph 3), and a constitution protects the states' powers.
In a confederation, the member states, not the center, are strongest.
Correct answer: A unitary system.
Tip: Ask "Who can change whom?" If the center can reshape the regions at will, it is unitary.
Question 24 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments
Three Ways to Divide Power
(1) Every country must decide how power is shared between its central government and its regional or local governments.
(2) In a unitary system, the central government holds supreme power. It can create regional and local governments, decide what powers they have, change their borders, or abolish them. France and Japan are unitary states.
(3) In a federal system, a written constitution divides power between the national government and state or provincial governments. Neither level can abolish the other, and each governs citizens directly. The United States, Canada, Mexico, and India have federal systems.
(4) In a confederation, independent states join together but keep most of the power. The central government is weak and depends on the member states for money and soldiers. The United States under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) was a confederation.
Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress could ask the states for money but had no power to collect taxes directly from citizens. States often paid little or nothing.
Which statement best explains this weakness, based on the passage?
Hint
Look at paragraph 4 and the Confederation panel of the diagram. What does the central government depend on?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 4: in a confederation, "The central government is weak and depends on the member states for money and soldiers. The United States under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) was a confederation." The diagram shows member states that "supply money and troops" to a weak central government.
Step by step:
The weakness: Congress could only ask states for money.
That matches the definition of a confederation: the center depends on members for money.
Eliminate federal and unitary—those central governments can raise their own money.
Eliminate the choice with the right system but a wrong reason (a confederation's center cannot abolish its members).
Correct answer: It is typical of a confederation, because the central government depends on the member states for money.
Tip: When two choices name the same answer, read the reason carefully. On the GED, "right idea, wrong reason" choices are common traps.
Question 25 of 35 · Civil rights
Federal Action on Civil Rights, 1948–1965
(1) On July 26, 1948, President Harry S. Truman signed Executive Order 9981. It stated: "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion or national origin." At the time, Black and white soldiers usually served in separate units.
(2) The table lists some of the actions taken by the federal government during the civil rights era.
Which statement is best supported by the table?
Hint
Note the year and the branch for every row. Which branch acted first? How many times did each branch act?
Step-by-step solution
Read the table row by row:
1948 — Executive (Executive Order 9981)
1954 — Judicial (Brown v. Board of Education)
1957 — Executive (troops to Little Rock)
1957 — Legislative (Civil Rights Act of 1957)
1964 — Legislative (Civil Rights Act of 1964)
1965 — Legislative (Voting Rights Act)
Step by step:
First executive action: 1948. First judicial action: 1954. First legislative action: 1957.
So the executive and judicial branches acted 9 and 3 years before Congress's first law in the table.
Count actions per branch: executive 2, judicial 1, legislative 3—so "exactly once" is false.
Laws in 1964–1965 show segregation had not ended by 1957.
Correct answer: The executive and judicial branches acted against segregation several years before Congress passed its first civil rights law of the period.
Tip: For table questions, check every number in an answer choice against the table. One wrong date or count makes the whole choice wrong.
Question 26 of 35 · Civil rights
Federal Action on Civil Rights, 1948–1965
(1) On July 26, 1948, President Harry S. Truman signed Executive Order 9981. It stated: "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion or national origin." At the time, Black and white soldiers usually served in separate units.
(2) The table lists some of the actions taken by the federal government during the civil rights era.
President Truman ordered equal treatment in the armed forces through Executive Order 9981 rather than waiting for Congress to pass a new law.
Which constitutional power made this possible?
Hint
Which Article II role puts the President in charge of the military?
Step-by-step solution
Executive Order 9981 set policy for "all persons in the armed services." Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution makes the President "Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States." As head of the military, the President can issue orders about how the armed forces are run.
Step by step:
The order applied only to the military.
The President commands the military under Article II.
So no new act of Congress was needed for this change.
Brown came later (1954) and dealt with schools; executive orders cannot override laws; no state request is mentioned.
Correct answer: The President is commander in chief of the armed forces.
Tip: Check dates when a choice says one event caused another. A cause must come before its effect.
Question 27 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities
Civil Rights and the Commerce Clause
(1) Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."
(2) In 1875, Congress passed a law banning racial discrimination in inns, theaters, and railroads. In the Civil Rights Cases (1883), the Supreme Court struck down that law. The Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment limits what state governments do; it does not give Congress power to regulate discrimination by private businesses.
(3) When Congress wrote the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it relied heavily on its power over interstate commerce. Supporters pointed out that Black travelers crossing state lines were often refused rooms and meals. This discouraged travel and reduced business across the country.
(4) The Heart of Atlanta Motel stood near two interstate highways, advertised in other states, and drew about three-quarters of its guests from outside Georgia. It refused to rent rooms to Black customers and sued to block the new law. In Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964), the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law. The justices ruled that racial discrimination by businesses serving interstate travelers placed a real burden on interstate commerce, which Congress may regulate.
Based on the passage, why did Congress rely mainly on its power over interstate commerce, rather than only on the Fourteenth Amendment, when it banned discrimination by motels and restaurants in the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Hint
Paragraph 2 explains what happened to an earlier anti-discrimination law. What did the Court say the Fourteenth Amendment does NOT cover?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 2: in the Civil Rights Cases (1883), the Court ruled "that the Fourteenth Amendment limits what state governments do; it does not give Congress power to regulate discrimination by private businesses." Paragraph 3: so in 1964, Congress "relied heavily on its power over interstate commerce."
Step by step:
Motels and restaurants are private businesses.
Under the 1883 ruling, the Fourteenth Amendment alone might not reach them.
The commerce power can reach private businesses whose actions affect trade between states—like a motel serving interstate travelers (paragraph 4).
The Heart of Atlanta decision confirmed this approach, but only after the law was passed.
Correct answer: The Supreme Court had ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment limits state governments, not private businesses such as motels.
Tip: "Why" questions about a choice often have their answer in an earlier event. Look for a past problem that the later action was designed to avoid.
Question 28 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
How Washington Shapes State Policy
(1) Each year, the federal government sends hundreds of billions of dollars to state and local governments. These payments, called grants-in-aid, help pay for highways, health care, schools, and much more.
(2) Grants come in different forms. A categorical grant may be spent only for a specific, narrowly defined purpose, and it usually comes with detailed rules. A block grant provides money for a broad area, such as community development, and lets each state decide which programs to fund.
(3) Congress may also attach conditions to grants. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 did not order states to raise their drinking age. Instead, it withheld part of a state's federal highway money if the state allowed people under 21 to buy alcohol. In South Dakota v. Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld this approach. By 1988, every state had set its drinking age at 21.
(4) Sometimes Congress simply requires states to act. A requirement placed on states by federal law is called a mandate. When Congress requires an action but provides no money to pay for it, the requirement is called an unfunded mandate.
(5) Supporters say grants and conditions create fair national standards on issues that cross state lines. Critics say they pressure states and weaken their ability to make their own choices.
Based on paragraph 3, the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 is best described as
Hint
Did the law order states to change, or did it give them a financial reason to change?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 3: the law "did not order states to raise their drinking age. Instead, it withheld part of a state's federal highway money if the state allowed people under 21 to buy alcohol."
Step by step:
A mandate orders states to act (paragraph 4). This law did not.
The law attached a condition to federal money: keep your full highway funds only if your drinking age is 21.
States were free to refuse—but would lose money. By 1988 all states had agreed.
A block grant gives more freedom; an amendment changes the Constitution itself.
Correct answer: a condition on federal funds that gave states a strong financial reason to change their own laws.
Tip: Watch the verbs. "Ordered" or "required" = mandate. "Withheld funds unless…" = condition on a grant.
Question 29 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
Drop-downHow Washington Shapes State Policy
(1) Each year, the federal government sends hundreds of billions of dollars to state and local governments. These payments, called grants-in-aid, help pay for highways, health care, schools, and much more.
(2) Grants come in different forms. A categorical grant may be spent only for a specific, narrowly defined purpose, and it usually comes with detailed rules. A block grant provides money for a broad area, such as community development, and lets each state decide which programs to fund.
(3) Congress may also attach conditions to grants. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 did not order states to raise their drinking age. Instead, it withheld part of a state's federal highway money if the state allowed people under 21 to buy alcohol. In South Dakota v. Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld this approach. By 1988, every state had set its drinking age at 21.
(4) Sometimes Congress simply requires states to act. A requirement placed on states by federal law is called a mandate. When Congress requires an action but provides no money to pay for it, the requirement is called an unfunded mandate.
(5) Supporters say grants and conditions create fair national standards on issues that cross state lines. Critics say they pressure states and weaken their ability to make their own choices.
Use the definitions in the passage to label each federal action.
Congress gives a state $40 million that may be used only to replace lead water pipes, following detailed federal rules. This is .
Congress gives a state $40 million for "social services" and lets the state choose which programs to fund. This is .
Congress requires every state to make all polling places accessible to voters with disabilities but provides no money to do it. This is .
Choose an answer from each menu.
Hint
Narrow purpose with rules → ? Broad area with state choice → ? A requirement with no money → ?
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 2: a categorical grant "may be spent only for a specific, narrowly defined purpose"; a block grant "provides money for a broad area… and lets each state decide which programs to fund." Paragraph 4: "When Congress requires an action but provides no money to pay for it, the requirement is called an unfunded mandate."
Step by step:
Lead pipes only + detailed rules → narrow purpose → categorical grant.
Correct answers: a categorical grant; a block grant; an unfunded mandate.
Tip: For definition-matching items, underline the key feature of each definition (narrow, broad, no money) and look for that feature in each example.
Question 30 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
Fill inWhere a State's Money Comes From
(1) The fictional State of Marlow publishes a yearly report showing where its general revenue comes from. The bar graph shows the six sources listed in the report for fiscal year 2025. Together, these six sources make up all of the state's general revenue.
Use the bar graph. What percent of the State of Marlow's total general revenue came from federal grants?
Round to the nearest whole percent.
%
Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.
Hint
First add all six bars to find the total. Then divide the federal grants amount by the total and multiply by 100.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 1 says the six sources "make up all of the state's general revenue," so the total is their sum.
Divide federal grants by the total: \dfrac{18.6}{53.0} \approx 0.351
Multiply by 100: about 35.1\%.
Round to the nearest whole percent: 35%.
Common errors: dividing by the second-largest bar instead of the total; or dividing 18.6 by 100 (giving 18.6%) as if the total were 100.
Correct answer: 35%.
Tip: "What percent of the total" always means \dfrac{\text{part}}{\text{whole}} \times 100. If the total is not given, build it by adding every part. The on-screen calculator is available for this step.
Question 31 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
(1) Background: In 1816, Congress created the Second Bank of the United States. The Constitution does not mention a power to create a bank. Maryland placed a tax on banks that were not chartered by the state, aimed at the national bank's branch in Baltimore. James McCulloch, an officer of that branch, refused to pay, and the case reached the Supreme Court.
(2) The Necessary and Proper Clause, Article I, Section 8: Congress shall have power "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."
(3) Chief Justice John Marshall, for the Court: "Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional."
(4) Marshall also wrote that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy." The Court ruled that Maryland could not tax the national bank.
Which modern action relies on the same reasoning Chief Justice Marshall used in paragraph 3?
Hint
Marshall says Congress may use any reasonable "means" to carry out a power the Constitution gives it, even if that means is not listed. Find a choice where Congress does this.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 3: "Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited… are constitutional." This is the idea of implied powers under the Necessary and Proper Clause (paragraph 2).
Step by step:
The "end" must be a real constitutional power. Regulating interstate commerce is listed in Article I, Section 8.
The "means" need not be listed, as long as it is appropriate and not prohibited. A food-inspection agency is not mentioned in the Constitution but is a reasonable way to regulate goods crossing state lines—just as the bank in 1816 was a means to carry out Congress's money and tax powers.
The state speed limit and the veto do not involve Congress using an unlisted means; the post-office tax is what Marshall forbade.
Correct answer: Congress creates a federal agency to inspect food shipped across state lines, as a way to carry out its power to regulate interstate commerce.
Tip: Turn a long quotation into a simple rule ("listed goal + reasonable method = allowed") and test each choice against that rule.
Question 32 of 35 · Borders between peoples and nations
Hot spotBorders on the Varn Plateau
(1) The map shows three fictional countries on the Varn Plateau. Two of their borders follow physical features. The third was drawn in 1891, when two European colonial powers signed a treaty in Europe dividing the region between them. The diplomats had never visited the plateau. They used a ruler and a line of latitude, and no one from the region was consulted.
(2) The Tamu people share one language and raise cattle. Each year, Tamu families move their herds between dry-season and rainy-season pastures. When Alvoria and Coraska became independent in the 1960s, both countries kept the border drawn in 1891.
According to the passage, one border on the map was drawn by diplomats who "used a ruler and a line of latitude."
Click that border on the map.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
A border drawn with a ruler along a line of latitude will be perfectly straight. Check the legend, too.
Step-by-step solution
Paragraph 1 says the 1891 border was drawn with "a ruler and a line of latitude." Such a border is a geometric border—perfectly straight. On the map, the straight dashed line labeled 8°N between Alvoria and Coraska is the only straight border, and the legend identifies it as the "Border set by 1891 treaty."
Step by step:
Eliminate the Lune River border: it winds, because it follows a river (a physical border).
Eliminate the Sarn Mountains border: it follows a mountain range (also a physical border).
The remaining border is straight and runs along 8°N.
Correct answer: the straight 8°N border between Alvoria and Coraska.
Tip: Always read a map's legend and labels. Physical borders follow rivers, mountains, or coastlines; geometric borders are straight lines, often along latitude or longitude.
Question 33 of 35 · Borders between peoples and nations
Borders on the Varn Plateau
(1) The map shows three fictional countries on the Varn Plateau. Two of their borders follow physical features. The third was drawn in 1891, when two European colonial powers signed a treaty in Europe dividing the region between them. The diplomats had never visited the plateau. They used a ruler and a line of latitude, and no one from the region was consulted.
(2) The Tamu people share one language and raise cattle. Each year, Tamu families move their herds between dry-season and rainy-season pastures. When Alvoria and Coraska became independent in the 1960s, both countries kept the border drawn in 1891.
Based on the map and the passage, which problem is the 1891 border most likely to cause?
Hint
Look at where the hatched Tamu homeland sits compared with the 8°N line. Then reread what Tamu families do each year.
Step-by-step solution
The map shows the hatched Tamu homeland lying across the 8°N line—partly in Alvoria and partly in Coraska. Paragraph 2 says the Tamu "share one language" and that "Each year, Tamu families move their herds between dry-season and rainy-season pastures," and that after independence "both countries kept the border drawn in 1891."
Step by step:
The border was drawn without consulting anyone in the region (paragraph 1).
It cuts through one people's homeland (map).
Herders cross it every year (paragraph 2).
Likely results: disputes over crossing the border with cattle, and a single people divided between two governments.
The other choices describe the river or mountain borders, or name the wrong country.
Correct answer: Tension over Tamu herders crossing the border and Tamu communities being split between two countries.
Tip: Geometric borders drawn by outsiders often split ethnic groups. Real-world examples include many borders drawn in Africa by European powers in the late 1800s.
Question 34 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Select allRemoving Barriers to the Ballot
(1) After Reconstruction ended, many Southern states adopted rules that kept Black citizens—and many poor white citizens—from voting. The most common were poll taxes (a fee a person had to pay in order to vote) and literacy tests (reading or civics tests, often judged unfairly by local officials).
(2) The Twenty-fourth Amendment, ratified in 1964, states: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."
(3) The amendment covered only federal elections. In Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that poll taxes in state elections violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
(4) The Voting Rights Act of 1965 suspended literacy tests in places where voter registration or turnout had been very low. Later amendments to the act banned literacy tests everywhere in the United States.
(5) States still set many voting rules, such as requiring citizens to register before Election Day. The Twenty-sixth Amendment (1971) bars states from denying the vote to citizens 18 or older because of age.
Based on the passage, which of the following voting requirements are no longer allowed anywhere in the United States?
Select all that apply.
Select all that apply.
Hint
Check each requirement against paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5. Note which elections each rule covers.
Step-by-step solution
Check each requirement:
Fee for a U.S. Senate election: the Twenty-fourth Amendment bans poll taxes for federal offices, including "Senator or Representative in Congress" (paragraph 2). → banned.
Fee for a governor's election: the amendment covered only federal elections, but Harper v. Virginia (1966) ruled "poll taxes in state elections violate the Equal Protection Clause" (paragraph 3). → banned.
Reading test: "Later amendments to the act banned literacy tests everywhere" (paragraph 4). → banned.
Registration before Election Day: still allowed (paragraph 5).
Minimum age of 18: allowed; the Twenty-sixth Amendment protects citizens 18 and older (paragraph 5).
Correct answers: the $2 fee for a Senate election, the $2 fee for a governor's election, and the reading test.
Tip: When a passage gives several laws and rulings, note the scope of each (federal elections only? everywhere?). Combining two sources—here the amendment and Harper—is often needed to get every answer.
Question 35 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction
The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) begins: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
This sentence most directly reversed which earlier Supreme Court decision?
Hint
Which pre-Civil War decision said that Black Americans could not be citizens of the United States?
Step-by-step solution
In Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), the Supreme Court ruled that Black Americans—free or enslaved—were not citizens of the United States and could not sue in federal court. After the Civil War, the Fourteenth Amendment declared that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States… are citizens." This made citizenship a birthright and overturned the Dred Scott holding.
Step by step:
The quoted sentence is about who is a citizen.
Find the earlier decision about citizenship: Dred Scott (1857).
Check dates: Plessy (1896) came after 1868, so it cannot be the answer.
Marbury and McCulloch deal with judicial review and federal power, not citizenship.
Correct answer: Dred Scott v. Sandford, which held that Black Americans could not be U.S. citizens.
Tip: An amendment or law can only reverse something that came before it. Checking dates quickly eliminates choices.