GED Social Studies Practice Test 2

Question 1 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

Two Levels of Government

Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause), 1787

(1) "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

Source 2: James Madison, The Federalist No. 45, 1788

Madison wrote this essay to persuade New Yorkers to ratify the proposed Constitution.

(2) "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."

Read both sources in "Two Levels of Government."

Taken together, the two sources describe which principle of the U.S. Constitution?

Answer choices
Hint

Both sources talk about the national (federal) government and the State governments. What principle describes how power is shared between those two levels?

Question 2 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Two Levels of Government

Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2 (the Supremacy Clause), 1787

(1) "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

Source 2: James Madison, The Federalist No. 45, 1788

Madison wrote this essay to persuade New Yorkers to ratify the proposed Constitution.

(2) "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the federal government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will, for the most part, be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties, and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State."

A state passes a law allowing farmers to use a certain pesticide. A valid federal law, passed under Congress's constitutional powers, bans that pesticide nationwide. A farmer in the state is charged with violating the federal law and argues that the state law protects him.

Based on Source 1, how should a judge rule?

Answer choices
Hint

Look at the end of Source 1: what must judges do when a state law says the opposite of a valid federal law?

Question 3 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Drag and drop

Under the U.S. Constitution, some powers belong only to the national government (delegated powers), some are kept by the states (reserved powers), and some are shared by both (concurrent powers).

Drag each power into the correct category.

Delegated (national only)Reserved (states)Concurrent (shared)

Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.

Hint

Ask: Could a state do this on its own? If two states doing it differently would cause national chaos (money, treaties), it is delegated. If both levels clearly do it, it is concurrent.

Question 4 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction

Lincoln's First Inaugural Address (1861)

Editor's note: When Abraham Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861, seven Southern states had already declared that they were leaving the Union and had formed the Confederate States of America. Lincoln spoke directly to them in his first speech as president.

(1) "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

(2) "Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy."

(3) "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors."

(4) "I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection."

Editor's note: About five weeks later, on April 12, 1861, Confederate forces opened fire on Fort Sumter, a U.S. Army fort in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. The Civil War had begun.

Which statement best summarizes Lincoln's position in March 1861, as shown in paragraphs 1 and 2 together?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 1 is about slavery; paragraph 2 is about secession. Find the choice that gets BOTH right.

Question 5 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction

Lincoln's First Inaugural Address (1861)

Editor's note: When Abraham Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861, seven Southern states had already declared that they were leaving the Union and had formed the Confederate States of America. Lincoln spoke directly to them in his first speech as president.

(1) "I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so."

(2) "Plainly the central idea of secession is the essence of anarchy."

(3) "In your hands, my dissatisfied fellow-countrymen, and not in mine, is the momentous issue of civil war. The Government will not assail you. You can have no conflict without being yourselves the aggressors."

(4) "I am loath to close. We are not enemies, but friends. We must not be enemies. Though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection."

Editor's note: About five weeks later, on April 12, 1861, Confederate forces opened fire on Fort Sumter, a U.S. Army fort in the harbor of Charleston, South Carolina. The Civil War had begun.

What is Lincoln's main purpose in paragraph 3?

Answer choices
Hint

Who does Lincoln say holds "the momentous issue of civil war"? Who would be "the aggressors"?

Question 6 of 35 · Development of classical civilizations

Two Empires and Their Frontiers

(1) About 2,000 years ago, two great empires ruled at opposite ends of Asia and Europe. The Roman Empire surrounded the Mediterranean Sea. In East Asia, the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) ruled China. Each empire governed tens of millions of people spread across huge distances.

(2) Ruling so much land was a constant challenge. Both empires built networks of roads so that armies, government officials, messengers, and merchants could move quickly from the capital to distant provinces. Roman roads eventually stretched for tens of thousands of miles. Han China also built roads and canals. Trade routes later called the Silk Road carried Chinese silk west across Central Asia. Rome and Han China never conquered each other or exchanged regular official visits, but through many middlemen, Chinese silk reached the markets of Rome.

(3) Each empire also tried to tie its people together with shared systems. The Romans spread the Latin language, Roman law, and Roman coins. Han emperors used a single written language for government records and trained officials in Confucian teachings at an imperial academy.

(4) Both empires faced threats from peoples living beyond their frontiers. Han emperors repaired and extended long walls begun by earlier rulers to guard against the Xiongnu, nomadic horse riders from the northern grasslands. In Britain, the Roman emperor Hadrian ordered a stone wall built across the island beginning around 122 CE; it ran about 73 miles. Soldiers stationed along these walls watched for raiders, and gates let them inspect travelers and collect taxes on goods passing through.

(5) Neither wall sealed its empire off. Raiders sometimes broke through, and trade continued across both frontiers. Instead, the walls marked where the emperor's direct control ended—a visible line between "inside" and "outside" the empire.

(6) Both empires eventually broke apart. The Han dynasty ended in 220 CE, and the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed in 476 CE.

According to paragraph 2, why did both the Roman Empire and Han China build road networks?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 2 lists who used the roads and why speed mattered.

Question 7 of 35 · Development of classical civilizations

Two Empires and Their Frontiers

(1) About 2,000 years ago, two great empires ruled at opposite ends of Asia and Europe. The Roman Empire surrounded the Mediterranean Sea. In East Asia, the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) ruled China. Each empire governed tens of millions of people spread across huge distances.

(2) Ruling so much land was a constant challenge. Both empires built networks of roads so that armies, government officials, messengers, and merchants could move quickly from the capital to distant provinces. Roman roads eventually stretched for tens of thousands of miles. Han China also built roads and canals. Trade routes later called the Silk Road carried Chinese silk west across Central Asia. Rome and Han China never conquered each other or exchanged regular official visits, but through many middlemen, Chinese silk reached the markets of Rome.

(3) Each empire also tried to tie its people together with shared systems. The Romans spread the Latin language, Roman law, and Roman coins. Han emperors used a single written language for government records and trained officials in Confucian teachings at an imperial academy.

(4) Both empires faced threats from peoples living beyond their frontiers. Han emperors repaired and extended long walls begun by earlier rulers to guard against the Xiongnu, nomadic horse riders from the northern grasslands. In Britain, the Roman emperor Hadrian ordered a stone wall built across the island beginning around 122 CE; it ran about 73 miles. Soldiers stationed along these walls watched for raiders, and gates let them inspect travelers and collect taxes on goods passing through.

(5) Neither wall sealed its empire off. Raiders sometimes broke through, and trade continued across both frontiers. Instead, the walls marked where the emperor's direct control ended—a visible line between "inside" and "outside" the empire.

(6) Both empires eventually broke apart. The Han dynasty ended in 220 CE, and the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed in 476 CE.

Which comparison of the Roman Empire and Han China is best supported by the passage as a whole?

Answer choices
Hint

Check each choice against a specific paragraph. Watch for words that go further than the passage, such as "directly" or "only."

Question 8 of 35 · Borders between peoples and nations

Two Empires and Their Frontiers

(1) About 2,000 years ago, two great empires ruled at opposite ends of Asia and Europe. The Roman Empire surrounded the Mediterranean Sea. In East Asia, the Han dynasty (206 BCE–220 CE) ruled China. Each empire governed tens of millions of people spread across huge distances.

(2) Ruling so much land was a constant challenge. Both empires built networks of roads so that armies, government officials, messengers, and merchants could move quickly from the capital to distant provinces. Roman roads eventually stretched for tens of thousands of miles. Han China also built roads and canals. Trade routes later called the Silk Road carried Chinese silk west across Central Asia. Rome and Han China never conquered each other or exchanged regular official visits, but through many middlemen, Chinese silk reached the markets of Rome.

(3) Each empire also tried to tie its people together with shared systems. The Romans spread the Latin language, Roman law, and Roman coins. Han emperors used a single written language for government records and trained officials in Confucian teachings at an imperial academy.

(4) Both empires faced threats from peoples living beyond their frontiers. Han emperors repaired and extended long walls begun by earlier rulers to guard against the Xiongnu, nomadic horse riders from the northern grasslands. In Britain, the Roman emperor Hadrian ordered a stone wall built across the island beginning around 122 CE; it ran about 73 miles. Soldiers stationed along these walls watched for raiders, and gates let them inspect travelers and collect taxes on goods passing through.

(5) Neither wall sealed its empire off. Raiders sometimes broke through, and trade continued across both frontiers. Instead, the walls marked where the emperor's direct control ended—a visible line between "inside" and "outside" the empire.

(6) Both empires eventually broke apart. The Han dynasty ended in 220 CE, and the western half of the Roman Empire collapsed in 476 CE.

Based on paragraphs 4 and 5, what was the main function of frontier walls such as Hadrian's Wall?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 5 tells you what the walls did NOT do. Use that to eliminate choices.

Question 9 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

An Independent Judiciary

Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 1, 1787

(1) "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."

Source 2: Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 78, 1788

(2) "Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."

(3) "… nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office …"

The phrase "during good Behavior" in Source 1 and Hamilton's phrase "permanency in office" in paragraph 3 both support which feature of the federal courts?

Answer choices
Hint

"During good Behavior" means as long as they behave properly—there is no set term. Why would that matter for a judge?

Question 10 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

An Independent Judiciary

Source 1: U.S. Constitution, Article III, Section 1, 1787

(1) "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."

Source 2: Alexander Hamilton, The Federalist No. 78, 1788

(2) "Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."

(3) "… nothing can contribute so much to its firmness and independence as permanency in office …"

In paragraph 2, Hamilton writes that the judiciary "must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."

Which event from U.S. history best illustrates this idea?

Answer choices
Hint

"Efficacy" means effectiveness. Which choice shows a court ruling that needed the President's power to actually take effect?

Question 11 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Hot spot
How Cases Reach the Supreme Court

(1) The United States has two court systems: a federal system and a separate system in each state. Most cases begin in a trial court, where witnesses testify and a judge or jury decides the facts. A party that loses can usually appeal to a higher court, which reviews whether the law was applied correctly.

(2) The U.S. Supreme Court sits at the top of both systems. It can review decisions of the federal courts of appeals. It can also review a decision of a state's highest court, but only when the case involves the U.S. Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty (a "federal question").

(3) The Supreme Court chooses most of the cases it hears. A party asks the Court to take its case by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari. The Court receives thousands of these petitions each year but usually agrees to hear fewer than 100 cases. By long tradition, the Court accepts a case if at least four of the nine justices vote to hear it. This custom is called the "rule of four." When the Court refuses to hear a case, the decision of the lower court stands.

Flowchart of the U.S. court systems. State court system (left): State trial court, arrow to State court of appeals, arrow to State supreme court, then an arrow labeled 'federal question only' to the U.S. Supreme Court. Federal court system (right): U.S. District Court (federal trial court), arrow labeled appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals (one of 13 circuits), arrow labeled appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sits at the bottom center above both systems' final steps. STATE COURT SYSTEM FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM State trial court State court of appeals State supreme court (highest court of the state) U.S. District Court (federal trial court) U.S. Court of Appeals (one of 13 circuits) U.S. SUPREME COURT federal question only appeal appeal appeal appeal

A company loses a lawsuit over a federal law in a U.S. District Court. The company appeals and loses again.

Click the court in the flowchart that the company could ask to review the case next.

Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).

Flowchart of the U.S. court systems. State court system (left): State trial court, arrow to State court of appeals, arrow to State supreme court, then an arrow labeled 'federal question only' to the U.S. Supreme Court. Federal court system (right): U.S. District Court (federal trial court), arrow labeled appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals (one of 13 circuits), arrow labeled appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sits at the bottom center above both systems' final steps. STATE COURT SYSTEM FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM State trial court State court of appeals State supreme court (highest court of the state) U.S. District Court (federal trial court) U.S. Court of Appeals (one of 13 circuits) U.S. SUPREME COURT federal question only appeal appeal appeal appeal
Hint

Follow the arrows in the federal system. Where does a District Court case go on appeal, and where does it go after that?

Question 12 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

How Cases Reach the Supreme Court

(1) The United States has two court systems: a federal system and a separate system in each state. Most cases begin in a trial court, where witnesses testify and a judge or jury decides the facts. A party that loses can usually appeal to a higher court, which reviews whether the law was applied correctly.

(2) The U.S. Supreme Court sits at the top of both systems. It can review decisions of the federal courts of appeals. It can also review a decision of a state's highest court, but only when the case involves the U.S. Constitution, a federal law, or a treaty (a "federal question").

(3) The Supreme Court chooses most of the cases it hears. A party asks the Court to take its case by filing a petition for a writ of certiorari. The Court receives thousands of these petitions each year but usually agrees to hear fewer than 100 cases. By long tradition, the Court accepts a case if at least four of the nine justices vote to hear it. This custom is called the "rule of four." When the Court refuses to hear a case, the decision of the lower court stands.

Flowchart of the U.S. court systems. State court system (left): State trial court, arrow to State court of appeals, arrow to State supreme court, then an arrow labeled 'federal question only' to the U.S. Supreme Court. Federal court system (right): U.S. District Court (federal trial court), arrow labeled appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals (one of 13 circuits), arrow labeled appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which sits at the bottom center above both systems' final steps. STATE COURT SYSTEM FEDERAL COURT SYSTEM State trial court State court of appeals State supreme court (highest court of the state) U.S. District Court (federal trial court) U.S. Court of Appeals (one of 13 circuits) U.S. SUPREME COURT federal question only appeal appeal appeal appeal

A petition for a writ of certiorari reaches the Supreme Court. Four justices vote to hear the case, and five justices vote not to hear it.

Based on the passage, what happens next?

Answer choices
Hint

Reread the sentence about the "rule of four." Does a case need a majority to be heard?

Question 13 of 35 · Key economic events in U.S. history

The Federal Reserve: Why It Exists and How It Decides

(1) Before 1913, the United States had no central bank. Banking "panics" struck again and again. In a panic, worried depositors rushed to withdraw their money all at once, and even healthy banks could run out of cash. During the Panic of 1907, banks failed and loans dried up until a group of private bankers led by J. P. Morgan organized a rescue.

(2) Congress responded with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The law's title described its goals: "An Act To provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." An elastic currency is a money supply that can stretch when the economy needs more money—during a panic, for example—and shrink when it needs less.

(3) The Federal Reserve System (the "Fed") has a Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., and 12 regional Reserve Banks. The seven governors are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 14-year terms. Decisions about interest rates are made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which meets eight times a year. Its 12 voting members are the seven governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the other eleven Reserve Bank presidents, who take turns.

(4) Since 1977, federal law has directed the Fed to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. The FOMC's main tool is its target for the federal funds rate, the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans. When the FOMC raises its target, interest rates on mortgages, car loans, and business loans tend to rise. Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows—though unemployment may rise. When the FOMC lowers its target, the opposite tends to happen.

(5) Long, overlapping terms are meant to make the Fed independent, so that its decisions are not driven by the next election. Supporters say this independence helps keep inflation under control. Critics argue that officials who are not elected should not hold so much power over the economy.

Based on paragraphs 1 and 2, Congress created the Federal Reserve mainly to

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 1 describes a problem; paragraph 2 describes the solution. Match the solution to the problem.

Question 14 of 35 · Macroeconomics

The Federal Reserve: Why It Exists and How It Decides

(1) Before 1913, the United States had no central bank. Banking "panics" struck again and again. In a panic, worried depositors rushed to withdraw their money all at once, and even healthy banks could run out of cash. During the Panic of 1907, banks failed and loans dried up until a group of private bankers led by J. P. Morgan organized a rescue.

(2) Congress responded with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The law's title described its goals: "An Act To provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." An elastic currency is a money supply that can stretch when the economy needs more money—during a panic, for example—and shrink when it needs less.

(3) The Federal Reserve System (the "Fed") has a Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., and 12 regional Reserve Banks. The seven governors are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 14-year terms. Decisions about interest rates are made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which meets eight times a year. Its 12 voting members are the seven governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the other eleven Reserve Bank presidents, who take turns.

(4) Since 1977, federal law has directed the Fed to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. The FOMC's main tool is its target for the federal funds rate, the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans. When the FOMC raises its target, interest rates on mortgages, car loans, and business loans tend to rise. Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows—though unemployment may rise. When the FOMC lowers its target, the opposite tends to happen.

(5) Long, overlapping terms are meant to make the Fed independent, so that its decisions are not driven by the next election. Supporters say this independence helps keep inflation under control. Critics argue that officials who are not elected should not hold so much power over the economy.

Inflation is high and rising. According to paragraph 4, what action would the FOMC most likely take?

Answer choices
Hint

Which change in the federal funds rate makes borrowing more expensive and slows spending?

Question 15 of 35 · Macroeconomics

Drop-down
The Federal Reserve: Why It Exists and How It Decides

(1) Before 1913, the United States had no central bank. Banking "panics" struck again and again. In a panic, worried depositors rushed to withdraw their money all at once, and even healthy banks could run out of cash. During the Panic of 1907, banks failed and loans dried up until a group of private bankers led by J. P. Morgan organized a rescue.

(2) Congress responded with the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. The law's title described its goals: "An Act To provide for the establishment of Federal reserve banks, to furnish an elastic currency, to afford means of rediscounting commercial paper, to establish a more effective supervision of banking in the United States, and for other purposes." An elastic currency is a money supply that can stretch when the economy needs more money—during a panic, for example—and shrink when it needs less.

(3) The Federal Reserve System (the "Fed") has a Board of Governors in Washington, D.C., and 12 regional Reserve Banks. The seven governors are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 14-year terms. Decisions about interest rates are made by the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), which meets eight times a year. Its 12 voting members are the seven governors, the president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and four of the other eleven Reserve Bank presidents, who take turns.

(4) Since 1977, federal law has directed the Fed to pursue maximum employment and stable prices. The FOMC's main tool is its target for the federal funds rate, the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans. When the FOMC raises its target, interest rates on mortgages, car loans, and business loans tend to rise. Borrowing becomes more expensive, so households and businesses spend less, and inflation slows—though unemployment may rise. When the FOMC lowers its target, the opposite tends to happen.

(5) Long, overlapping terms are meant to make the Fed independent, so that its decisions are not driven by the next election. Supporters say this independence helps keep inflation under control. Critics argue that officials who are not elected should not hold so much power over the economy.

The FOMC votes to lower its target for the federal funds rate. Complete the chain of likely effects.

Loans for homes, cars, and businesses become . As a result, spending by households and businesses tends to . Unemployment then tends to . The main risk of keeping rates low for too long is .

Choose an answer from each menu.

Hint

Paragraph 4 describes what happens when rates go UP. Lowering rates causes "the opposite." Reverse each step.

Question 16 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

The President nominates justices to the Supreme Court, but the Senate must vote to confirm them before they can serve.

This arrangement is an example of which constitutional principle?

Answer choices
Hint

One branch acts, and another branch can approve or block that action.

Question 17 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction

Hot spot
From Election to Abolition, 1860–1865

(1) President Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation as a war measure. It declared enslaved people free only in areas that were still in rebellion against the United States. It did not apply to slave states that had stayed loyal to the Union, such as Kentucky and Delaware. Because the Proclamation rested on the president's wartime powers, many people worried that courts might overturn it once the fighting stopped.

(2) Supporters of abolition therefore pushed for a change to the Constitution itself, which no single court ruling or future president could undo.

Timeline, 1860 to 1865, events evenly spaced: November 1860, Abraham Lincoln elected president; December 1860, South Carolina secedes from the Union; April 1861, Confederates fire on Fort Sumter, war begins; January 1863, Emancipation Proclamation takes effect; July 1863, Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg; April 1865, Lee surrenders at Appomattox Court House; December 1865, Thirteenth Amendment ratified. Nov. 1860 Abraham Lincoln elected president Dec. 1860 South Carolina secedes from the Union Apr. 1861 Confederates fire on Fort Sumter; war begins Jan. 1863 Emancipation Proclamation takes effect July 1863 Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg Apr. 1865 Lee surrenders at Appomattox Court House Dec. 1865 Thirteenth Amendment ratified Events are evenly spaced and not drawn to scale.

Click the event on the timeline that ended slavery everywhere in the United States, including in slave states that had stayed loyal to the Union.

Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).

Timeline, 1860 to 1865, events evenly spaced: November 1860, Abraham Lincoln elected president; December 1860, South Carolina secedes from the Union; April 1861, Confederates fire on Fort Sumter, war begins; January 1863, Emancipation Proclamation takes effect; July 1863, Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg; April 1865, Lee surrenders at Appomattox Court House; December 1865, Thirteenth Amendment ratified. Nov. 1860 Abraham Lincoln elected president Dec. 1860 South Carolina secedes from the Union Apr. 1861 Confederates fire on Fort Sumter; war begins Jan. 1863 Emancipation Proclamation takes effect July 1863 Union victories at Gettysburg and Vicksburg Apr. 1865 Lee surrenders at Appomattox Court House Dec. 1865 Thirteenth Amendment ratified Events are evenly spaced and not drawn to scale.
Hint

Paragraph 1 explains why the Emancipation Proclamation did not reach every state. Paragraph 2 says what supporters of abolition pushed for instead.

Question 18 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction

Drag and drop

Drag each event into the period in which it happened.

Rising tensions before the war (1850–1860)Reconstruction (1865–1877)

Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.

Hint

Before the war, the fights were about whether slavery would spread into new territories. After the war, the questions were about the rights of freed people and how to rebuild the South.

Question 19 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities

Does the Bill of Rights Limit the States?

(1) When the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in 1791, it limited only the national government. In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court confirmed that the Bill of Rights did not apply to state governments. A state could, in theory, limit speech or search homes in ways Congress could not.

(2) The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, changed this. It says that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Over many decades, the Supreme Court ruled that the "liberty" protected by this Due Process Clause includes most of the rights listed in the Bill of Rights. Because the Court applied these rights to the states one at a time, the process is called selective incorporation.

(3) Some key steps:

  • Gitlow v. New York (1925): The Court accepted that freedom of speech and of the press are protected against state governments, not just the national government.
  • Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Evidence gathered in an illegal search may not be used in a state criminal trial.
  • Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): A state must provide a lawyer to a person charged with a serious crime who cannot afford one.

(4) Incorporation is not complete. The Court has never required states to follow the Fifth Amendment's rule that serious federal charges begin with a grand jury indictment, or the Seventh Amendment's right to a jury in civil lawsuits (disputes over money or property). States may use their own procedures for these.

According to the passage, which part of the Constitution allowed the Supreme Court to apply most of the Bill of Rights to state governments?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 2 quotes the clause and names it.

Question 20 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities

Select all
Does the Bill of Rights Limit the States?

(1) When the Bill of Rights was added to the Constitution in 1791, it limited only the national government. In Barron v. Baltimore (1833), the Supreme Court confirmed that the Bill of Rights did not apply to state governments. A state could, in theory, limit speech or search homes in ways Congress could not.

(2) The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, changed this. It says that no state shall "deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." Over many decades, the Supreme Court ruled that the "liberty" protected by this Due Process Clause includes most of the rights listed in the Bill of Rights. Because the Court applied these rights to the states one at a time, the process is called selective incorporation.

(3) Some key steps:

  • Gitlow v. New York (1925): The Court accepted that freedom of speech and of the press are protected against state governments, not just the national government.
  • Mapp v. Ohio (1961): Evidence gathered in an illegal search may not be used in a state criminal trial.
  • Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): A state must provide a lawyer to a person charged with a serious crime who cannot afford one.

(4) Incorporation is not complete. The Court has never required states to follow the Fifth Amendment's rule that serious federal charges begin with a grand jury indictment, or the Seventh Amendment's right to a jury in civil lawsuits (disputes over money or property). States may use their own procedures for these.

Based on the passage, which of the following actions by a state government would most likely be ruled unconstitutional today?

Select all that apply.

Select all that apply.

Answer choices
Hint

Match each action to a case in paragraph 3. Then check paragraph 4 for rights that have NOT been applied to the states.

Question 21 of 35 · Macroeconomics

Fighting Inflation, 1979–1984

(1) By 1979, prices in the United States had been rising rapidly for most of the decade. In August 1979, Paul Volcker became chair of the Federal Reserve. Under his leadership, the Fed sharply limited the growth of the money supply, and interest rates climbed to the highest levels in modern U.S. history.

(2) The graph shows three yearly averages: the inflation rate (the rise in consumer prices), the unemployment rate, and the federal funds rate (the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans, which the Fed influences).

Line graph of U.S. annual averages, 1979 to 1984, in percent. Inflation rate: 1979 11.3, 1980 13.5, 1981 10.3, 1982 6.2, 1983 3.2, 1984 4.3. Unemployment rate: 1979 5.8, 1980 7.1, 1981 7.6, 1982 9.7, 1983 9.6, 1984 7.5. Federal funds rate: 1979 11.2, 1980 13.4, 1981 16.4, 1982 12.2, 1983 9.1, 1984 10.2. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Year Percent 11.3 13.5 10.3 6.2 3.2 4.3 5.8 7.1 7.6 9.7 9.6 7.5 11.2 13.4 16.4 12.2 9.1 10.2 Inflation rate Unemployment rate Federal funds rate

Which conclusion is best supported by the graph?

Answer choices
Hint

Trace each line separately. When did the federal funds rate peak? What happened to inflation and unemployment in the next year or two?

Question 22 of 35 · Macroeconomics

Fill in
Fighting Inflation, 1979–1984

(1) By 1979, prices in the United States had been rising rapidly for most of the decade. In August 1979, Paul Volcker became chair of the Federal Reserve. Under his leadership, the Fed sharply limited the growth of the money supply, and interest rates climbed to the highest levels in modern U.S. history.

(2) The graph shows three yearly averages: the inflation rate (the rise in consumer prices), the unemployment rate, and the federal funds rate (the interest rate banks charge each other for overnight loans, which the Fed influences).

Line graph of U.S. annual averages, 1979 to 1984, in percent. Inflation rate: 1979 11.3, 1980 13.5, 1981 10.3, 1982 6.2, 1983 3.2, 1984 4.3. Unemployment rate: 1979 5.8, 1980 7.1, 1981 7.6, 1982 9.7, 1983 9.6, 1984 7.5. Federal funds rate: 1979 11.2, 1980 13.4, 1981 16.4, 1982 12.2, 1983 9.1, 1984 10.2. 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 Year Percent 11.3 13.5 10.3 6.2 3.2 4.3 5.8 7.1 7.6 9.7 9.6 7.5 11.2 13.4 16.4 12.2 9.1 10.2 Inflation rate Unemployment rate Federal funds rate

Use the graph. By how many percentage points did the inflation rate fall from 1980 to 1983?

percentage points

Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.

Hint

Read the inflation line (solid line, circle markers) at 1980 and at 1983, then subtract.

Question 23 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments

Three Ways to Divide Power

(1) Every country must decide how power is shared between its central government and its regional or local governments.

(2) In a unitary system, the central government holds supreme power. It can create regional and local governments, decide what powers they have, change their borders, or abolish them. France and Japan are unitary states.

(3) In a federal system, a written constitution divides power between the national government and state or provincial governments. Neither level can abolish the other, and each governs citizens directly. The United States, Canada, Mexico, and India have federal systems.

(4) In a confederation, independent states join together but keep most of the power. The central government is weak and depends on the member states for money and soldiers. The United States under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) was a confederation.

Diagram of three systems. Unitary: the central government creates, grants powers to, and can abolish regional and local governments, which govern citizens; the central government holds supreme power. Federal: a written constitution divides power between the national government and state governments; both levels govern citizens. Confederation: member states grant limited powers to a weak central government and supply it with money and troops; member states govern citizens and hold most power. UNITARY Central government Regional and local governments Citizens creates, grants powers to, can abolish governs Central government holds supreme power FEDERAL U.S.-style written constitution National government State governments Citizens divides power Constitution divides power; both levels govern citizens CONFEDERATION Central government (weak) Member states Citizens grant limited powers to; supply money and troops govern Member states hold most power

In the fictional nation of Corland, the national parliament passed a law that merged 22 regions into 13 larger regions and moved some of the regions' powers to the national government. The regional governments had no legal way to block the change.

Based on the passage, Corland most likely has which system of government?

Answer choices
Hint

Which system lets the central government change regional borders, change their powers, or abolish them?

Question 24 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments

Three Ways to Divide Power

(1) Every country must decide how power is shared between its central government and its regional or local governments.

(2) In a unitary system, the central government holds supreme power. It can create regional and local governments, decide what powers they have, change their borders, or abolish them. France and Japan are unitary states.

(3) In a federal system, a written constitution divides power between the national government and state or provincial governments. Neither level can abolish the other, and each governs citizens directly. The United States, Canada, Mexico, and India have federal systems.

(4) In a confederation, independent states join together but keep most of the power. The central government is weak and depends on the member states for money and soldiers. The United States under the Articles of Confederation (1781–1789) was a confederation.

Diagram of three systems. Unitary: the central government creates, grants powers to, and can abolish regional and local governments, which govern citizens; the central government holds supreme power. Federal: a written constitution divides power between the national government and state governments; both levels govern citizens. Confederation: member states grant limited powers to a weak central government and supply it with money and troops; member states govern citizens and hold most power. UNITARY Central government Regional and local governments Citizens creates, grants powers to, can abolish governs Central government holds supreme power FEDERAL U.S.-style written constitution National government State governments Citizens divides power Constitution divides power; both levels govern citizens CONFEDERATION Central government (weak) Member states Citizens grant limited powers to; supply money and troops govern Member states hold most power

Under the Articles of Confederation, Congress could ask the states for money but had no power to collect taxes directly from citizens. States often paid little or nothing.

Which statement best explains this weakness, based on the passage?

Answer choices
Hint

Look at paragraph 4 and the Confederation panel of the diagram. What does the central government depend on?

Question 25 of 35 · Civil rights

Federal Action on Civil Rights, 1948–1965

(1) On July 26, 1948, President Harry S. Truman signed Executive Order 9981. It stated: "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion or national origin." At the time, Black and white soldiers usually served in separate units.

(2) The table lists some of the actions taken by the federal government during the civil rights era.

Table: Federal action on civil rights, 1948 to 1965. 1948: President Harry S. Truman issues Executive Order 9981, calling for equal treatment and opportunity in the armed forces (Executive branch). 1954: Supreme Court rules in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated public schools are unconstitutional (Judicial branch). 1957: President Dwight D. Eisenhower sends federal troops to enforce a desegregation order at Central High School, Little Rock, Arkansas (Executive branch). 1957: Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1957, creating the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Legislative branch). 1964: Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1964, banning segregation in public accommodations and discrimination in employment (Legislative branch). 1965: Congress passes the Voting Rights Act of 1965, targeting barriers such as literacy tests that kept citizens from voting (Legislative branch). Year Federal action Branch 1948 President Harry S. Truman issues Executive Order 9981, calling for equal treatment and opportunity in the armed forces Executive 1954 Supreme Court rules in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated public schools are unconstitutional Judicial 1957 President Dwight D. Eisenhower sends federal troops to enforce a desegregation order at Central High School, Little Rock, Arkansas Executive 1957 Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1957, creating the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Legislative 1964 Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1964, banning segregation in public accommodations and discrimination in employment Legislative 1965 Congress passes the Voting Rights Act of 1965, targeting barriers such as literacy tests that kept citizens from voting Legislative

Which statement is best supported by the table?

Answer choices
Hint

Note the year and the branch for every row. Which branch acted first? How many times did each branch act?

Question 26 of 35 · Civil rights

Federal Action on Civil Rights, 1948–1965

(1) On July 26, 1948, President Harry S. Truman signed Executive Order 9981. It stated: "It is hereby declared to be the policy of the President that there shall be equality of treatment and opportunity for all persons in the armed services without regard to race, color, religion or national origin." At the time, Black and white soldiers usually served in separate units.

(2) The table lists some of the actions taken by the federal government during the civil rights era.

Table: Federal action on civil rights, 1948 to 1965. 1948: President Harry S. Truman issues Executive Order 9981, calling for equal treatment and opportunity in the armed forces (Executive branch). 1954: Supreme Court rules in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated public schools are unconstitutional (Judicial branch). 1957: President Dwight D. Eisenhower sends federal troops to enforce a desegregation order at Central High School, Little Rock, Arkansas (Executive branch). 1957: Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1957, creating the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Legislative branch). 1964: Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1964, banning segregation in public accommodations and discrimination in employment (Legislative branch). 1965: Congress passes the Voting Rights Act of 1965, targeting barriers such as literacy tests that kept citizens from voting (Legislative branch). Year Federal action Branch 1948 President Harry S. Truman issues Executive Order 9981, calling for equal treatment and opportunity in the armed forces Executive 1954 Supreme Court rules in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated public schools are unconstitutional Judicial 1957 President Dwight D. Eisenhower sends federal troops to enforce a desegregation order at Central High School, Little Rock, Arkansas Executive 1957 Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1957, creating the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Legislative 1964 Congress passes the Civil Rights Act of 1964, banning segregation in public accommodations and discrimination in employment Legislative 1965 Congress passes the Voting Rights Act of 1965, targeting barriers such as literacy tests that kept citizens from voting Legislative

President Truman ordered equal treatment in the armed forces through Executive Order 9981 rather than waiting for Congress to pass a new law.

Which constitutional power made this possible?

Answer choices
Hint

Which Article II role puts the President in charge of the military?

Question 27 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities

Civil Rights and the Commerce Clause

(1) Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution gives Congress the power "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."

(2) In 1875, Congress passed a law banning racial discrimination in inns, theaters, and railroads. In the Civil Rights Cases (1883), the Supreme Court struck down that law. The Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment limits what state governments do; it does not give Congress power to regulate discrimination by private businesses.

(3) When Congress wrote the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it relied heavily on its power over interstate commerce. Supporters pointed out that Black travelers crossing state lines were often refused rooms and meals. This discouraged travel and reduced business across the country.

(4) The Heart of Atlanta Motel stood near two interstate highways, advertised in other states, and drew about three-quarters of its guests from outside Georgia. It refused to rent rooms to Black customers and sued to block the new law. In Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States (1964), the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the law. The justices ruled that racial discrimination by businesses serving interstate travelers placed a real burden on interstate commerce, which Congress may regulate.

Based on the passage, why did Congress rely mainly on its power over interstate commerce, rather than only on the Fourteenth Amendment, when it banned discrimination by motels and restaurants in the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 2 explains what happened to an earlier anti-discrimination law. What did the Court say the Fourteenth Amendment does NOT cover?

Question 28 of 35 · Contemporary public policy

How Washington Shapes State Policy

(1) Each year, the federal government sends hundreds of billions of dollars to state and local governments. These payments, called grants-in-aid, help pay for highways, health care, schools, and much more.

(2) Grants come in different forms. A categorical grant may be spent only for a specific, narrowly defined purpose, and it usually comes with detailed rules. A block grant provides money for a broad area, such as community development, and lets each state decide which programs to fund.

(3) Congress may also attach conditions to grants. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 did not order states to raise their drinking age. Instead, it withheld part of a state's federal highway money if the state allowed people under 21 to buy alcohol. In South Dakota v. Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld this approach. By 1988, every state had set its drinking age at 21.

(4) Sometimes Congress simply requires states to act. A requirement placed on states by federal law is called a mandate. When Congress requires an action but provides no money to pay for it, the requirement is called an unfunded mandate.

(5) Supporters say grants and conditions create fair national standards on issues that cross state lines. Critics say they pressure states and weaken their ability to make their own choices.

Based on paragraph 3, the National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 is best described as

Answer choices
Hint

Did the law order states to change, or did it give them a financial reason to change?

Question 29 of 35 · Contemporary public policy

Drop-down
How Washington Shapes State Policy

(1) Each year, the federal government sends hundreds of billions of dollars to state and local governments. These payments, called grants-in-aid, help pay for highways, health care, schools, and much more.

(2) Grants come in different forms. A categorical grant may be spent only for a specific, narrowly defined purpose, and it usually comes with detailed rules. A block grant provides money for a broad area, such as community development, and lets each state decide which programs to fund.

(3) Congress may also attach conditions to grants. The National Minimum Drinking Age Act of 1984 did not order states to raise their drinking age. Instead, it withheld part of a state's federal highway money if the state allowed people under 21 to buy alcohol. In South Dakota v. Dole (1987), the Supreme Court upheld this approach. By 1988, every state had set its drinking age at 21.

(4) Sometimes Congress simply requires states to act. A requirement placed on states by federal law is called a mandate. When Congress requires an action but provides no money to pay for it, the requirement is called an unfunded mandate.

(5) Supporters say grants and conditions create fair national standards on issues that cross state lines. Critics say they pressure states and weaken their ability to make their own choices.

Use the definitions in the passage to label each federal action.

Congress gives a state $40 million that may be used only to replace lead water pipes, following detailed federal rules. This is .

Congress gives a state $40 million for "social services" and lets the state choose which programs to fund. This is .

Congress requires every state to make all polling places accessible to voters with disabilities but provides no money to do it. This is .

Choose an answer from each menu.

Hint

Narrow purpose with rules → ? Broad area with state choice → ? A requirement with no money → ?

Question 30 of 35 · Contemporary public policy

Fill in
Where a State's Money Comes From

(1) The fictional State of Marlow publishes a yearly report showing where its general revenue comes from. The bar graph shows the six sources listed in the report for fiscal year 2025. Together, these six sources make up all of the state's general revenue.

Horizontal bar chart: State of Marlow general revenue by source, fiscal year 2025, in billions of dollars: Federal grants 18.6; Sales taxes 12.4; Individual income taxes 10.8; Fees and charges 5.3; Other 3.0; Corporate income taxes 2.9. State of Marlow: General Revenue by Source, Fiscal Year 2025 (billions of dollars) Federal grants 18.6 Sales taxes 12.4 Individual income taxes 10.8 Fees and charges 5.3 Other 3.0 Corporate income taxes 2.9

Use the bar graph. What percent of the State of Marlow's total general revenue came from federal grants?

Round to the nearest whole percent.

%

Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.

Hint

First add all six bars to find the total. Then divide the federal grants amount by the total and multiply by 100.

Question 31 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

(1) Background: In 1816, Congress created the Second Bank of the United States. The Constitution does not mention a power to create a bank. Maryland placed a tax on banks that were not chartered by the state, aimed at the national bank's branch in Baltimore. James McCulloch, an officer of that branch, refused to pay, and the case reached the Supreme Court.

(2) The Necessary and Proper Clause, Article I, Section 8: Congress shall have power "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

(3) Chief Justice John Marshall, for the Court: "Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional."

(4) Marshall also wrote that "the power to tax involves the power to destroy." The Court ruled that Maryland could not tax the national bank.

Which modern action relies on the same reasoning Chief Justice Marshall used in paragraph 3?

Answer choices
Hint

Marshall says Congress may use any reasonable "means" to carry out a power the Constitution gives it, even if that means is not listed. Find a choice where Congress does this.

Question 32 of 35 · Borders between peoples and nations

Hot spot
Borders on the Varn Plateau

(1) The map shows three fictional countries on the Varn Plateau. Two of their borders follow physical features. The third was drawn in 1891, when two European colonial powers signed a treaty in Europe dividing the region between them. The diplomats had never visited the plateau. They used a ruler and a line of latitude, and no one from the region was consulted.

(2) The Tamu people share one language and raise cattle. Each year, Tamu families move their herds between dry-season and rainy-season pastures. When Alvoria and Coraska became independent in the 1960s, both countries kept the border drawn in 1891.

Schematic map of three fictional countries. Alvoria is in the northwest and Coraska in the southwest; the border between them is a straight dashed line along 8 degrees north latitude, which the legend identifies as the border set by the 1891 treaty. Brennic is in the east. The Alvoria-Brennic border follows the winding Lune River. The Coraska-Brennic border follows the Sarn Mountains. A hatched oval labeled Tamu homeland straddles the 8 degrees north line, lying partly in Alvoria and partly in Coraska. The map is not drawn to scale. 8°N ALVORIA CORASKA BRENNIC Tamu homeland Lune River Sarn Mountains River Mountain range Border set by 1891 treaty Tamu homeland (Tamu-speaking herding communities)

According to the passage, one border on the map was drawn by diplomats who "used a ruler and a line of latitude."

Click that border on the map.

Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).

Schematic map of three fictional countries. Alvoria is in the northwest and Coraska in the southwest; the border between them is a straight dashed line along 8 degrees north latitude, which the legend identifies as the border set by the 1891 treaty. Brennic is in the east. The Alvoria-Brennic border follows the winding Lune River. The Coraska-Brennic border follows the Sarn Mountains. A hatched oval labeled Tamu homeland straddles the 8 degrees north line, lying partly in Alvoria and partly in Coraska. The map is not drawn to scale. 8°N ALVORIA CORASKA BRENNIC Tamu homeland Lune River Sarn Mountains River Mountain range Border set by 1891 treaty Tamu homeland (Tamu-speaking herding communities)
Hint

A border drawn with a ruler along a line of latitude will be perfectly straight. Check the legend, too.

Question 33 of 35 · Borders between peoples and nations

Borders on the Varn Plateau

(1) The map shows three fictional countries on the Varn Plateau. Two of their borders follow physical features. The third was drawn in 1891, when two European colonial powers signed a treaty in Europe dividing the region between them. The diplomats had never visited the plateau. They used a ruler and a line of latitude, and no one from the region was consulted.

(2) The Tamu people share one language and raise cattle. Each year, Tamu families move their herds between dry-season and rainy-season pastures. When Alvoria and Coraska became independent in the 1960s, both countries kept the border drawn in 1891.

Schematic map of three fictional countries. Alvoria is in the northwest and Coraska in the southwest; the border between them is a straight dashed line along 8 degrees north latitude, which the legend identifies as the border set by the 1891 treaty. Brennic is in the east. The Alvoria-Brennic border follows the winding Lune River. The Coraska-Brennic border follows the Sarn Mountains. A hatched oval labeled Tamu homeland straddles the 8 degrees north line, lying partly in Alvoria and partly in Coraska. The map is not drawn to scale. 8°N ALVORIA CORASKA BRENNIC Tamu homeland Lune River Sarn Mountains River Mountain range Border set by 1891 treaty Tamu homeland (Tamu-speaking herding communities)

Based on the map and the passage, which problem is the 1891 border most likely to cause?

Answer choices
Hint

Look at where the hatched Tamu homeland sits compared with the 8°N line. Then reread what Tamu families do each year.

Question 34 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections

Select all
Removing Barriers to the Ballot

(1) After Reconstruction ended, many Southern states adopted rules that kept Black citizens—and many poor white citizens—from voting. The most common were poll taxes (a fee a person had to pay in order to vote) and literacy tests (reading or civics tests, often judged unfairly by local officials).

(2) The Twenty-fourth Amendment, ratified in 1964, states: "The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reason of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax."

(3) The amendment covered only federal elections. In Harper v. Virginia State Board of Elections (1966), the Supreme Court ruled that poll taxes in state elections violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

(4) The Voting Rights Act of 1965 suspended literacy tests in places where voter registration or turnout had been very low. Later amendments to the act banned literacy tests everywhere in the United States.

(5) States still set many voting rules, such as requiring citizens to register before Election Day. The Twenty-sixth Amendment (1971) bars states from denying the vote to citizens 18 or older because of age.

Based on the passage, which of the following voting requirements are no longer allowed anywhere in the United States?

Select all that apply.

Select all that apply.

Answer choices
Hint

Check each requirement against paragraphs 2, 3, 4 and 5. Note which elections each rule covers.

Question 35 of 35 · Civil War and Reconstruction

The Fourteenth Amendment (1868) begins: "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

This sentence most directly reversed which earlier Supreme Court decision?

Answer choices
Hint

Which pre-Civil War decision said that Black Americans could not be citizens of the United States?