This is an estimate based on your percent correct on our practice tests. The official GED score conversion is not public, so your real score may differ. Scores of 145+ pass; 165+ is College Ready.
Question 1 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution (1787)
The Constitution begins with a single sentence, called the Preamble, that explains who is creating the government and why.
(1) "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The Preamble begins with the words "We the People of the United States." These words best reflect which principle of American government?
Hint
Ask yourself: according to these opening words, who is creating the government and giving it its power?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: The Preamble says that "We the People of the United States … do ordain and establish this Constitution." In other words, the people themselves create the government.
Step by step:
The subject of the sentence is "We the People." The verb is "do ordain and establish."
So the authority to create the Constitution comes from the people, not from a king, an army or the state governments acting alone.
The idea that a government's power comes from the people it governs is called popular sovereignty.
The other choices are real principles, but the opening words do not describe them: they say nothing about dividing power among branches, courts reviewing laws, or splitting power between nation and states.
The correct answer is popular sovereignty: the government's power comes from the people.
Tip: When a question asks about "We the People," "consent of the governed" or elections, think popular sovereignty.
Question 2 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
Drag and dropThe Preamble to the U.S. Constitution (1787)
The Constitution begins with a single sentence, called the Preamble, that explains who is creating the government and why.
(1) "We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."
The Preamble lists goals of the new government. Drag each modern government action to the goal from the Preamble that it best serves.
establish Justice
insure domestic Tranquility
provide for the common defence
promote the general Welfare
Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.
Hint
Think about the plain meaning of each phrase: justice = fair treatment under law; domestic tranquility = peace at home; common defence = protection from outside attack; general welfare = the well-being of the people.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: The Preamble lists the goals "establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare."
Step by step:
Establish Justice means setting up a fair system of laws and courts. Operating federal courts, where cases are heard and decided under the law, fits this goal.
Insure domestic Tranquility means keeping peace inside the country ("domestic" = at home). Sending troops to stop an armed uprising inside the country restores peace at home.
Provide for the common defence means protecting the nation from outside threats. Keeping an army and navy ready to defend against foreign attack fits this goal.
Promote the general Welfare means improving the well-being of the people in general. Funding programs that improve public health fits this goal.
Notice the difference between items 2 and 3: both use military force, but domestic tranquility is about trouble at home, while the common defence is about foreign enemies.
Tip: On the GED, old-fashioned wording in a founding document can usually be translated word by word. Replace each phrase with a modern synonym before you match.
Question 3 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Voter Turnout in Marlow County
Marlow County is a fictional county. The chart shows the percent of registered voters who cast a ballot in each year's November election. In some years, the ballot included a race for president. In other years, it included races for Congress but not president (a midterm election), or only local offices such as mayor and school board.
Which conclusion is best supported by the data in the chart?
Hint
Check each choice against every bar. A conclusion must be true for all the data, and it must not add a cause the chart does not show.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the chart: Presidential-year turnout was 61% (2016), 66% (2020) and 63% (2024). The highest turnout in any other year was 46% (2022 midterm).
Step by step:
Compare the lowest presidential year (61%) with the highest non-presidential year (46%). Since 61% > 46%, every presidential year beat every other year.
Check "rose every year": 2016 = 61% but 2017 = 21%, so turnout did not rise every year. Eliminate.
"Voters think local elections are less important" is an opinion about why people did not vote. The chart shows how many voted, not their reasons. Eliminate.
"A new voting law" is never mentioned. The chart cannot show a cause that is not in it. Eliminate.
The correct answer is turnout was higher in every presidential election year than in any year without a presidential race.
Tip: A supported conclusion summarizes a pattern in the data. Be wary of answers that explain why something happened unless the stimulus gives the reason.
Question 4 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Hot spotVoter Turnout in Marlow County
Marlow County is a fictional county. The chart shows the percent of registered voters who cast a ballot in each year's November election. In some years, the ballot included a race for president. In other years, it included races for Congress but not president (a midterm election), or only local offices such as mayor and school board.
Look at the chart. Click the bar for the election year with the lowest voter turnout.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Find the shortest bar. Read the percent printed above it.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the chart: The local-election-only years had the shortest bars: 2017 = 21%, 2019 = 18%, 2021 = 24% and 2023 = 22%.
Step by step:
The presidential years (61%, 66%, 63%) and midterm years (44%, 46%) are all far taller, so the answer must be one of the red local-election bars.
Compare the red bars: 18% < 21% < 22% < 24%.
The lowest value, 18%, belongs to 2019.
The correct answer is the 2019 bar (18%).
Tip: When bars are close in height, do not judge by eye alone. Read the labels or line the bars up with the grid lines on the vertical axis.
Question 5 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Drop-downVoter Turnout in Marlow County
Marlow County is a fictional county. The chart shows the percent of registered voters who cast a ballot in each year's November election. In some years, the ballot included a race for president. In other years, it included races for Congress but not president (a midterm election), or only local offices such as mayor and school board.
Use the chart to complete the sentence.
In 2022, turnout was turnout in 2020 by percentage points.
Choose an answer from each menu.
Hint
Find the 2020 and 2022 bars. Decide which is taller, then subtract the smaller percent from the larger one.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the chart: 2020 (presidential) = 66%. 2022 (midterm) = 46%.
Step by step:
46% is less than 66%, so 2022 turnout was lower than 2020 turnout.
The difference is 66 - 46 = 20 percentage points.
Do not add the two values (66 + 46 = 112) and do not report one of the values (46 or 66) as the difference.
The completed sentence: In 2022, turnout was lower than turnout in 2020 by 20 percentage points.
Tip: When two values are already percents, the gap between them is measured in percentage points: simply subtract one percent from the other.
Question 6 of 35 · Revolutionary and early republic periods
Why a New Constitution?
(1) After declaring independence in 1776, the thirteen states needed a national government. The Articles of Confederation, which took effect in 1781, created a weak one on purpose. Having just fought a powerful king, many Americans did not trust a strong central government. Under the Articles, Congress had only one house, and each state had one vote. There was no president to carry out laws and no national court system. Congress could not collect taxes; it could only ask the states for money, and the states often paid little or nothing. Congress also could not regulate trade between the states. Any change to the Articles required the agreement of all thirteen states.
(2) Problems grew during the 1780s. The national government could not pay the debts left over from the Revolutionary War. In 1786, farmers in western Massachusetts, many of them deep in debt and facing the loss of their land, rose up in what became known as Shays' Rebellion. The national government had no money to raise an army, and the uprising was put down by a militia that the state organized. Many leaders saw the rebellion as proof that the national government was too weak to keep order.
(3) In 1787, delegates from twelve states met in Philadelphia. Rhode Island refused to send anyone. The delegates' official task was to revise the Articles, but they soon decided to write a completely new plan. One of the sharpest disputes was over representation. States with large populations wanted the number of representatives to depend on population. States with small populations wanted every state to have an equal voice. The delegates settled the question with the Great Compromise: Congress would have two houses. In the House of Representatives, seats would be based on each state's population. In the Senate, every state would have two senators.
(4) The new Constitution then had to be approved, or ratified, by the states. Supporters, called Federalists, argued that the nation needed a stronger central government. Opponents, called Anti-Federalists, feared that a powerful national government would threaten the states and the liberties of individual citizens. They especially objected that the Constitution did not include a list of protected rights. In several states, ratification succeeded after supporters indicated that amendments protecting individual rights would be added. The Constitution took effect in 1789, and the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, were ratified in 1791.
According to paragraphs 1 and 2, which weakness of the Articles of Confederation most directly explains why the national government could not pay its war debts?
Hint
Several choices are true facts from paragraph 1. Pick the one that is connected to money.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1 says: "Congress could not collect taxes; it could only ask the states for money, and the states often paid little or nothing." Paragraph 2 adds: "The national government could not pay the debts left over from the Revolutionary War."
Step by step:
The question asks about paying debts, which is a problem of money.
The only weakness in the choices that deals with money is Congress's inability to tax. Without taxes, it depended on states that "often paid little or nothing."
The other three choices are real weaknesses described in paragraph 1, but none of them explains a shortage of money: one vote per state, no national courts, and the unanimous-amendment rule are about voting, justice and changing the rules.
The correct answer is Congress could not collect taxes and had to request money from the states.
Tip: On cause-and-effect questions, several answers may be true. Choose the one that is connected to the specific effect in the question.
Question 7 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Why a New Constitution?
(1) After declaring independence in 1776, the thirteen states needed a national government. The Articles of Confederation, which took effect in 1781, created a weak one on purpose. Having just fought a powerful king, many Americans did not trust a strong central government. Under the Articles, Congress had only one house, and each state had one vote. There was no president to carry out laws and no national court system. Congress could not collect taxes; it could only ask the states for money, and the states often paid little or nothing. Congress also could not regulate trade between the states. Any change to the Articles required the agreement of all thirteen states.
(2) Problems grew during the 1780s. The national government could not pay the debts left over from the Revolutionary War. In 1786, farmers in western Massachusetts, many of them deep in debt and facing the loss of their land, rose up in what became known as Shays' Rebellion. The national government had no money to raise an army, and the uprising was put down by a militia that the state organized. Many leaders saw the rebellion as proof that the national government was too weak to keep order.
(3) In 1787, delegates from twelve states met in Philadelphia. Rhode Island refused to send anyone. The delegates' official task was to revise the Articles, but they soon decided to write a completely new plan. One of the sharpest disputes was over representation. States with large populations wanted the number of representatives to depend on population. States with small populations wanted every state to have an equal voice. The delegates settled the question with the Great Compromise: Congress would have two houses. In the House of Representatives, seats would be based on each state's population. In the Senate, every state would have two senators.
(4) The new Constitution then had to be approved, or ratified, by the states. Supporters, called Federalists, argued that the nation needed a stronger central government. Opponents, called Anti-Federalists, feared that a powerful national government would threaten the states and the liberties of individual citizens. They especially objected that the Constitution did not include a list of protected rights. In several states, ratification succeeded after supporters indicated that amendments protecting individual rights would be added. The Constitution took effect in 1789, and the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, were ratified in 1791.
Based on paragraph 3, which feature of today's Congress is a direct result of the Great Compromise?
Hint
Reread what the Great Compromise decided about the two houses. Which choice describes both parts of that deal?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3 says the Great Compromise created two houses: "In the House of Representatives, seats would be based on each state's population. In the Senate, every state would have two senators."
Step by step:
The compromise had two parts: population-based seats in the House (what large states wanted) and equal seats in the Senate (what small states wanted).
A state with many people, such as California, has many House members; a state with few people, such as Wyoming, has very few. But each has exactly two senators. That is the Great Compromise at work.
Senators' six-year terms and the veto override are real features of the Constitution, but paragraph 3 does not connect them to the dispute over representation.
"Each state casts one vote in Congress" describes the old Articles of Confederation (paragraph 1), which the compromise replaced.
The correct answer is a state with a large population has more House members than a small state, but both have two senators.
Tip: Remember the Great Compromise as "House = population, Senate = equal." Questions about why large and small states are treated differently in Congress usually point back to it.
Question 8 of 35 · Revolutionary and early republic periods
Drop-downWhy a New Constitution?
(1) After declaring independence in 1776, the thirteen states needed a national government. The Articles of Confederation, which took effect in 1781, created a weak one on purpose. Having just fought a powerful king, many Americans did not trust a strong central government. Under the Articles, Congress had only one house, and each state had one vote. There was no president to carry out laws and no national court system. Congress could not collect taxes; it could only ask the states for money, and the states often paid little or nothing. Congress also could not regulate trade between the states. Any change to the Articles required the agreement of all thirteen states.
(2) Problems grew during the 1780s. The national government could not pay the debts left over from the Revolutionary War. In 1786, farmers in western Massachusetts, many of them deep in debt and facing the loss of their land, rose up in what became known as Shays' Rebellion. The national government had no money to raise an army, and the uprising was put down by a militia that the state organized. Many leaders saw the rebellion as proof that the national government was too weak to keep order.
(3) In 1787, delegates from twelve states met in Philadelphia. Rhode Island refused to send anyone. The delegates' official task was to revise the Articles, but they soon decided to write a completely new plan. One of the sharpest disputes was over representation. States with large populations wanted the number of representatives to depend on population. States with small populations wanted every state to have an equal voice. The delegates settled the question with the Great Compromise: Congress would have two houses. In the House of Representatives, seats would be based on each state's population. In the Senate, every state would have two senators.
(4) The new Constitution then had to be approved, or ratified, by the states. Supporters, called Federalists, argued that the nation needed a stronger central government. Opponents, called Anti-Federalists, feared that a powerful national government would threaten the states and the liberties of individual citizens. They especially objected that the Constitution did not include a list of protected rights. In several states, ratification succeeded after supporters indicated that amendments protecting individual rights would be added. The Constitution took effect in 1789, and the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights, were ratified in 1791.
Use paragraph 4 to complete the sentences.
Anti-Federalists opposed the Constitution mainly because they feared . In several states, ratification succeeded after supporters indicated that would be added.
Choose an answer from each menu.
Hint
Find the sentence in paragraph 4 that begins "Opponents, called Anti-Federalists, feared…" and the sentence that follows it.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 4 says Anti-Federalists "feared that a powerful national government would threaten the states and the liberties of individual citizens." It then says ratification succeeded "after supporters indicated that amendments protecting individual rights would be added."
Step by step:
Blank 1 asks what the Anti-Federalists feared. The text says they feared a powerful national government, not a weak one. "Too weak to pay its debts" was the Federalists' worry, so it reverses the two sides.
Small states gaining power was a concern in the representation debate (paragraph 3), not the Anti-Federalists' main objection.
Blank 2 asks what was promised. The text says "amendments protecting individual rights," which became the Bill of Rights in 1791. A national army and a unanimous-vote rule are never mentioned.
Completed: Anti-Federalists feared a strong national government could threaten the states and individual liberties; ratification succeeded after supporters indicated that amendments protecting individual rights would be added.
Tip: Keep the two sides straight: Federalists = for a stronger national government; Anti-Federalists = against it, and wanted a bill of rights.
Question 9 of 35 · Consumer economics
Comparing Two Credit Card Offers
Maria has received two credit card offers. The table compares their main costs.
To estimate a year of interest, multiply the APR by the average balance a person carries (does not pay off) during the year.
Maria plans to pay her full statement balance by the due date every month. Based on the table, which card would cost her less over a year, and why?
Hint
Read the footnote about the grace period. If Maria never carries a balance, will she ever pay interest?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the table: The footnote says that during the grace period, "if the full statement balance is paid by the due date, no interest is charged on new purchases." Card A's annual fee is $0; Card B's annual fee is $60.
Step by step:
Maria will pay in full every month, so she will pay no interest on either card. The APR (24% or 18%) does not matter for her.
Both cards have the same late fee ($40), and she pays on time, so late fees do not matter either.
The only cost left is the annual fee: $0 for Card A versus $60 for Card B.
Card A costs her $60 less per year.
The correct answer is Card A, because she will owe no interest and Card A has no annual fee.
Tip: The best credit card depends on how you use it. People who pay in full should focus on fees; people who carry a balance should focus on the APR.
Question 10 of 35 · Consumer economics
Fill inComparing Two Credit Card Offers
Maria has received two credit card offers. The table compares their main costs.
To estimate a year of interest, multiply the APR by the average balance a person carries (does not pay off) during the year.
Maria's brother expects to carry an average balance of $2,000 on his card all year. Use the table and the estimate described below it.
What is the estimated total yearly cost of Card B (interest plus annual fee)?
$
Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.
Hint
Multiply the APR by the average balance to estimate interest. Then don't forget the annual fee.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the table: Card B has an APR of 18% and an annual fee of $60. The note below the table says to estimate a year of interest by multiplying "the APR by the average balance."
Check against Card A for comparison: 0.24 \times 2{,}000 = 480 dollars of interest plus a $0 fee = $480. So for someone who carries a balance, Card B is cheaper even with its fee.
Card B's estimated total yearly cost is $420.
Tip: Common mistakes are forgetting the annual fee ($360) or using the wrong card's APR ($480 or $540). Write down each cost before adding.
Question 11 of 35 · Human migration
Hot spotInternal Migration in Kestovia
Kestovia is a fictional country. The map shows its four regions, a few facts about each one, and the number of people who moved between regions from 2015 to 2025. The Tamar River forms the border with the neighboring country of Rusen.
Look at the map. Click the region that gained the most people through migration from 2015 to 2025.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Follow the arrowheads. Add up all the arrows that point into each region.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the map: Arrows point into the Capital Coast from three regions: 240,000 from the Northern Plains, 90,000 from the Central Hills and 30,000 from the Eastern Valley.
Step by step:
Capital Coast: 240{,}000 + 90{,}000 + 30{,}000 = 360{,}000 people arrived, and no arrow leaves it.
Eastern Valley: 60,000 arrived from the Northern Plains, but 30,000 left for the Capital Coast, a net gain of only 30,000.
Northern Plains: no arrows point in; 300,000 people left. Central Hills: no arrows point in; 90,000 left.
A common error is to click the Northern Plains because it touches the two biggest arrows. But those arrows start there; people are leaving it.
The correct answer is the Capital Coast.
Tip: On migration maps, the arrowhead shows the destination. Count arrows in for gains and arrows out for losses.
Question 12 of 35 · Environment and societal development
Internal Migration in Kestovia
Kestovia is a fictional country. The map shows its four regions, a few facts about each one, and the number of people who moved between regions from 2015 to 2025. The Tamar River forms the border with the neighboring country of Rusen.
Based on the map, which factor most likely pushed people to leave the Northern Plains?
Hint
A push factor is a problem in the place people are leaving. Look only at the information written inside the Northern Plains.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the map: The Northern Plains label says "Wheat farming; rainfall down 30% since 2010." The other facts on the map describe other regions.
Step by step:
A push factor is a condition that drives people away from where they live.
Wheat farming depends on rain. A 30% drop in rainfall would hurt harvests and farm jobs, giving people a reason to leave. This is an environmental push factor.
New port and factory jobs are in the Capital Coast. They are a pull factor attracting people to that region, not a problem in the Northern Plains.
River irrigation is a feature of the Eastern Valley, another pull factor for farmers who moved there.
Closing coal mines are in the Central Hills, not the Northern Plains.
The correct answer is declining rainfall in a wheat-farming region.
Tip: Match each fact to the right place before you classify it. A detail can be true on the map and still belong to the wrong region.
Question 13 of 35 · Borders between peoples and nations
Internal Migration in Kestovia
Kestovia is a fictional country. The map shows its four regions, a few facts about each one, and the number of people who moved between regions from 2015 to 2025. The Tamar River forms the border with the neighboring country of Rusen.
The border between Kestovia and Rusen is best described as which kind of boundary?
Hint
Look at what the border line follows on the map. Is it drawn along something in nature, or along a straight surveyed line?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the map: The caption says "The Tamar River forms the border with the neighboring country of Rusen," and the map draws the eastern border along the winding river.
Step by step:
A physical (natural) boundary follows a feature of the land or water, such as a river, mountain range or lake.
Because the border follows the Tamar River, it is a physical boundary.
A geometric boundary is a straight line drawn by surveyors, often along latitude or longitude. This border winds with the river, so it is not geometric.
A cultural boundary separates groups by language or religion. The map gives no information about language or religion.
The map does not show any dispute or conflict over the border.
The correct answer is a physical boundary that follows a natural feature.
Tip: Rivers and mountains often became borders because they were easy to identify and hard to cross. When a border wiggles on a map, check whether it follows a river.
Question 14 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Choosing Senators: The Constitution and the Seventeenth Amendment
Source 1: The original Constitution, Article I, Section 3 (1787)
(1) "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote."
Source 2: The Seventeenth Amendment (ratified 1913)
(2) "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote."
Compare the two sources. What did the Seventeenth Amendment change?
Hint
Read the two sentences side by side. Find the only words that are different.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Source 1 says senators are "chosen by the Legislature thereof" (by the state legislature). Source 2 says senators are "elected by the people thereof" (by the voters of the state).
Step by step:
Both sources say "two Senators from each State," so the number did not change.
Both say "for six Years," so the term length did not change.
Both say "each Senator shall have one Vote," so senators' voting power did not change.
The only difference is who chooses the senators: state legislatures before 1913, the people afterward.
The correct answer is senators are now elected directly by the voters of each state instead of by state legislatures.
Tip: When two documents are nearly identical, the question is almost always about the few words that differ. Compare them phrase by phrase.
Question 15 of 35 · Principles of American constitutional democracy
Choosing Senators: The Constitution and the Seventeenth Amendment
Source 1: The original Constitution, Article I, Section 3 (1787)
(1) "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, chosen by the Legislature thereof, for six Years; and each Senator shall have one Vote."
Source 2: The Seventeenth Amendment (ratified 1913)
(2) "The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State, elected by the people thereof, for six years; and each Senator shall have one vote."
Which statement best describes how the Seventeenth Amendment changed the balance of power?
Hint
Ask who lost a role and who gained one. State legislatures and ordinary voters are the two groups to compare.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Before the amendment, senators were "chosen by the Legislature" of each state (Source 1). After it, they were "elected by the people thereof" (Source 2).
Step by step:
Who lost a role? State legislatures, which no longer pick senators.
Who gained a role? Ordinary citizens, who now vote for senators directly. This strengthens popular sovereignty, the idea that power comes from the people.
Check the other choices:
Small and large states still have two senators each, so the balance between them did not change.
The selection did not move "from the federal government to the states." It moved from state legislatures to voters, and the original system was already run by the states.
The House of Representatives plays no part in choosing senators in either source.
The correct answer is it reduced the role of state legislatures and gave voters a direct voice in choosing senators.
Tip: For "balance of power" questions, name the winner and the loser before you look at the choices. Then pick the choice that matches both.
Question 16 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments
Drag and dropFour Nations, Four Systems
The four countries below are fictional. Each profile describes how the country is governed.
(1) Velmora. Every four years, citizens vote for a president, who heads the government and commands the military. In a separate election, they choose members of a national legislature that writes the laws. A written constitution limits what the government may do, and independent courts can strike down laws that violate it. Several political parties compete for office.
(2) Ostreth. A queen is the head of state. She inherited the throne from her father, and her duties are mostly ceremonial. Voters elect members of a parliament. The leader of the party that wins the most seats in parliament becomes prime minister and runs the government. A constitution limits the powers of the queen and the parliament.
(3) Darnovia. Twelve years ago, a group of army officers overthrew the elected government. Their leader, a general, now makes laws by issuing decrees. National elections have been canceled, opposition parties are banned and newspapers must be approved by the government before they are printed.
(4) Sarith. A king who inherited the throne holds all lawmaking, executive and judicial power. There is no legislature and no written constitution that limits him. Advisers serve only as long as the king wishes.
Drag each country to the type of government it best represents.
Presidential democracy
Constitutional monarchy
Military dictatorship
Absolute monarchy
Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.
Hint
Two countries have a king or queen. Look at how much power that ruler actually holds.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence:
Velmora (paragraph 1): citizens elect a president separately from the legislature, and a constitution limits government. This is a presidential democracy.
Ostreth (paragraph 2): a queen inherited the throne, but "her duties are mostly ceremonial," voters elect a parliament and a constitution limits her powers. This is a constitutional monarchy.
Darnovia (paragraph 3): army officers "overthrew the elected government," and a general rules by decree with no elections. This is a military dictatorship.
Sarith (paragraph 4): a king "holds all lawmaking, executive and judicial power" with no constitution to limit him. This is an absolute monarchy.
Step by step: The key to telling the two monarchies apart is whether the monarch's power is limited. Ostreth's queen is limited by a constitution and an elected parliament; Sarith's king is not limited at all. The key to telling Darnovia apart from Sarith is how the ruler got power: by force (dictatorship) or by inheritance (monarchy).
Tip: Ask three questions about any government: Who holds power? How did they get it? What limits it?
Question 17 of 35 · Types of modern and historical governments
Select allFour Nations, Four Systems
The four countries below are fictional. Each profile describes how the country is governed.
(1) Velmora. Every four years, citizens vote for a president, who heads the government and commands the military. In a separate election, they choose members of a national legislature that writes the laws. A written constitution limits what the government may do, and independent courts can strike down laws that violate it. Several political parties compete for office.
(2) Ostreth. A queen is the head of state. She inherited the throne from her father, and her duties are mostly ceremonial. Voters elect members of a parliament. The leader of the party that wins the most seats in parliament becomes prime minister and runs the government. A constitution limits the powers of the queen and the parliament.
(3) Darnovia. Twelve years ago, a group of army officers overthrew the elected government. Their leader, a general, now makes laws by issuing decrees. National elections have been canceled, opposition parties are banned and newspapers must be approved by the government before they are printed.
(4) Sarith. A king who inherited the throne holds all lawmaking, executive and judicial power. There is no legislature and no written constitution that limits him. Advisers serve only as long as the king wishes.
Select all the features of Velmora's government that it shares with the government of the United States.
Select all that apply.
Hint
Use only paragraph 1 for Velmora. Some choices describe Ostreth instead.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 1 says Velmora's citizens "vote for a president" and "in a separate election" choose a legislature; "a written constitution limits what the government may do"; and "independent courts can strike down laws that violate it."
Step by step:
Separate election of the chief executive — the U.S. president is chosen in a separate election from Congress. Shared. ✔
Written constitution limiting government — the U.S. Constitution limits the government's powers. Shared. ✔
Courts that can strike down laws — U.S. courts have the power of judicial review. Shared. ✔
A hereditary head of state describes Ostreth's queen (paragraph 2), not Velmora, and the U.S. has no hereditary ruler. ✘
The leader of the largest party in the legislature runs the government describes Ostreth's parliamentary system (paragraph 2). In the U.S., the president is not chosen by Congress. ✘
The correct answers are the separate election of a president, the written constitution and the courts' power to strike down laws.
Tip: In select-all questions, judge each choice on its own as true or false. Watch for choices that are true about a different country or source in the same stimulus.
Question 18 of 35 · Revolutionary and early republic periods
The Northwest Ordinance (1787) and the Thirteenth Amendment (1865)
In 1787, Congress passed the Northwest Ordinance to govern the territory north and west of the Ohio River, land that later became states such as Ohio, Indiana and Illinois.
Source 1: Northwest Ordinance, Article 3 (1787)
(1) "Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged."
Source 2: Northwest Ordinance, Article 6 (1787)
(2) "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted …"
Source 3: Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Section 1 (ratified 1865)
(3) "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
Source 1 suggests that the Congress that passed the Northwest Ordinance believed that
Hint
Read the first half of the sentence: what does Congress say knowledge is "necessary to"?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Source 1 says that "religion, morality, and knowledge" are "necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind," and therefore "schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged."
Step by step:
The sentence gives a reason (knowledge is necessary to good government) and a result (education should be encouraged).
So Congress linked education to good government: an educated public helps self-government work.
"Encouraged" is not "required." The text does not make religion mandatory or say the national government must run every school.
Nothing in the text limits education to the wealthy; "forever be encouraged" suggests broad support.
The correct answer is education would help support good government in the new territory.
Tip: Watch for answer choices that turn a mild word (encouraged) into a strong one (required, must). On the GED, the strength of the claim must match the source.
Question 19 of 35 · Key historical documents
The Northwest Ordinance (1787) and the Thirteenth Amendment (1865)
In 1787, Congress passed the Northwest Ordinance to govern the territory north and west of the Ohio River, land that later became states such as Ohio, Indiana and Illinois.
Source 1: Northwest Ordinance, Article 3 (1787)
(1) "Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged."
Source 2: Northwest Ordinance, Article 6 (1787)
(2) "There shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in the said territory, otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted …"
Source 3: Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, Section 1 (ratified 1865)
(3) "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
Which statement accurately compares Source 2 and Source 3?
Hint
Check two things: where each ban applies, and whether each one has an exception.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Source 2 bans slavery "in the said territory" (only the Northwest Territory), "otherwise than in the punishment of crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted." Source 3 bans slavery "within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction," "except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted."
Step by step:
Where: Source 2 covers one territory. Source 3 covers the entire United States. So the amendment widened the ban.
Exception: Both contain nearly identical wording allowing forced labor as punishment for a person convicted of a crime. So the statement that the amendment "makes no exceptions" is false.
The Ordinance did not ban slavery in all states; it applied only to "the said territory."
The amendment did not allow slavery in territories; it bans it in "any place subject to their jurisdiction."
The correct answer is both ban slavery except as punishment for a crime, but the amendment applies the ban to the whole nation rather than one territory.
Tip: When two documents share wording, look for the small phrases that change their scope (where or to whom they apply). Later documents often borrow language from earlier ones and extend it.
Question 20 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities
Voter Guide: Getting Ready for Election Day
This guide was published by the elections office of a fictional state.
(1) Who can register. You may register to vote if you are a U.S. citizen, a resident of this state and at least 18 years old on or before Election Day. Your registration form must be received by your county elections office at least 15 days before Election Day. You can register online, by mail or in person at the county elections office.
(2) Keep your registration current. If you move to a new address, even within the same county or city, or if you change your name, you must update your registration before the 15-day deadline. You do not need to re-register if your address and name have stayed the same.
(3) Three ways to vote.
Early voting: Any registered voter may vote in person at a county elections office starting 14 days before Election Day. Early voting ends 2 days before Election Day.
Voting by mail: Request a mail ballot at least 7 days before Election Day. Completed mail ballots must be received by the county elections office by 8 p.m. on Election Day. Ballots that arrive later will not be counted.
Election Day: Polling places are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
(4) Bring photo identification. Acceptable ID includes a driver's license, a state ID card, a U.S. passport or a military ID. A voter who does not have ID may cast a provisional ballot. It will be counted if the voter confirms his or her identity at the county elections office within 3 days after the election.
According to paragraph 2, which voter must update his or her registration before the deadline?
Hint
Paragraph 2 names two situations that require an update. Look for a choice that matches one of them.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2 says: "If you move to a new address, even within the same county or city, or if you change your name, you must update your registration."
Step by step:
The two triggers for an update are (a) moving to a new address and (b) changing your name.
A voter who moved across town has a new address. The phrase "even within the same county or city" means a short move still counts.
Turning a year older does not change a registration. Neither does choosing early voting or having voted by mail before.
Paragraph 2 also says, "You do not need to re-register if your address and name have stayed the same."
The correct answer is a voter who moved to a new apartment across town since the last election.
Tip: Keeping your registration up to date is a civic responsibility. On detail questions, find the exact rule in the text and match it to the situation.
Question 21 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Select allVoter Guide: Getting Ready for Election Day
This guide was published by the elections office of a fictional state.
(1) Who can register. You may register to vote if you are a U.S. citizen, a resident of this state and at least 18 years old on or before Election Day. Your registration form must be received by your county elections office at least 15 days before Election Day. You can register online, by mail or in person at the county elections office.
(2) Keep your registration current. If you move to a new address, even within the same county or city, or if you change your name, you must update your registration before the 15-day deadline. You do not need to re-register if your address and name have stayed the same.
(3) Three ways to vote.
Early voting: Any registered voter may vote in person at a county elections office starting 14 days before Election Day. Early voting ends 2 days before Election Day.
Voting by mail: Request a mail ballot at least 7 days before Election Day. Completed mail ballots must be received by the county elections office by 8 p.m. on Election Day. Ballots that arrive later will not be counted.
Election Day: Polling places are open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m.
(4) Bring photo identification. Acceptable ID includes a driver's license, a state ID card, a U.S. passport or a military ID. A voter who does not have ID may cast a provisional ballot. It will be counted if the voter confirms his or her identity at the county elections office within 3 days after the election.
Select all the statements that are supported by the voter guide.
Select all that apply.
Hint
Test each statement against the exact deadlines and rules in paragraphs 1, 3 and 4. Pay close attention to words like received and ends.
Step-by-step solution
Step by step, checking each statement:
A 17-year-old who turns 18 the week before Election Day may register. Paragraph 1 requires voters to be "at least 18 years old on or before Election Day." This person will be 18 by Election Day, so the statement is supported, as long as the form arrives by the 15-day deadline. ✔
A mail ballot mailed on Election Day that arrives the next day will be counted. Paragraph 3 says ballots must be "received … by 8 p.m. on Election Day" and "ballots that arrive later will not be counted." Not supported. ✘
A voter without photo ID may still cast a provisional ballot. Paragraph 4 says exactly this. Supported. ✔
Early voting is available on the day before Election Day. Paragraph 3 says early voting "ends 2 days before Election Day." Not supported. ✘
Registration forms are accepted until Election Day. Paragraph 1 says forms "must be received … at least 15 days before Election Day." Not supported. ✘
The correct answers are the 17-year-old who will turn 18 before Election Day and the voter without ID casting a provisional ballot.
Tip: Deadlines are favorite GED details. Notice whether a rule depends on when something is sent or when it is received.
Question 22 of 35 · Microeconomics
Why Egg Prices Jumped
This passage describes a hypothetical market based on the kinds of events that affect food prices.
(1) Late one winter, an outbreak of bird flu spread through egg farms in a large farming region. To stop the disease, farmers had to remove about one-fifth of their egg-laying hens. With fewer hens, farms could produce far fewer eggs.
(2) Shoppers' wants did not change much. Families still bought eggs for breakfast, and bakeries still needed them for bread and cakes. Within a few months, the average price of a dozen eggs in the region's grocery stores rose from $2.50 to $4.75.
(3) Many shoppers responded by buying fewer eggs. Some switched to other breakfast foods, such as oatmeal or yogurt, and some home bakers tried egg replacers made from plants. A few restaurants added a small charge to dishes made with eggs.
(4) Over the next year, farms bought young hens and rebuilt their flocks. As egg production returned to normal, grocery prices fell back toward their earlier level.
In paragraph 3, shoppers who switched from eggs to oatmeal or yogurt are an example of
Hint
What do economists call a good that people can use in place of another good?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3 says that when egg prices rose, "some switched to other breakfast foods, such as oatmeal or yogurt."
Step by step:
Oatmeal and yogurt can be eaten instead of eggs at breakfast. Goods that can replace each other are called substitutes.
When the price of one good rises, buyers often switch to its substitutes. That is exactly what the shoppers did.
Complements are goods used together (eggs and bacon, cars and gasoline). The shoppers were not buying oatmeal with eggs; they were buying it instead of eggs.
A price floor is a legal minimum price set by government; no law is mentioned.
A surplus happens when more is supplied than buyers want; here eggs became scarce, the opposite of a surplus.
The correct answer is buying substitute goods when the price of a product rises.
Tip: Substitutes = "instead of." Complements = "together with." When one good's price rises, people buy more of its substitutes and less of its complements.
Question 23 of 35 · Fundamental economic concepts
Drop-downWhy Egg Prices Jumped
This passage describes a hypothetical market based on the kinds of events that affect food prices.
(1) Late one winter, an outbreak of bird flu spread through egg farms in a large farming region. To stop the disease, farmers had to remove about one-fifth of their egg-laying hens. With fewer hens, farms could produce far fewer eggs.
(2) Shoppers' wants did not change much. Families still bought eggs for breakfast, and bakeries still needed them for bread and cakes. Within a few months, the average price of a dozen eggs in the region's grocery stores rose from $2.50 to $4.75.
(3) Many shoppers responded by buying fewer eggs. Some switched to other breakfast foods, such as oatmeal or yogurt, and some home bakers tried egg replacers made from plants. A few restaurants added a small charge to dishes made with eggs.
(4) Over the next year, farms bought young hens and rebuilt their flocks. As egg production returned to normal, grocery prices fell back toward their earlier level.
Use paragraph 4 to complete the sentence.
As farms rebuilt their flocks, the supply of eggs , so the price of eggs while demand stayed about the same.
Choose an answer from each menu.
Hint
Paragraph 4 describes the recovery. Did production go up or down? Then think about what happens to price when more of a good is available.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 4 says farms "rebuilt their flocks" and "as egg production returned to normal, grocery prices fell back toward their earlier level."
Step by step:
More hens means farms can sell more eggs at every price. That is an increase in supply.
Paragraph 2 says shoppers' wants "did not change much," so demand stayed about the same.
When supply increases and demand stays the same, the price falls. The passage confirms this: prices "fell back toward their earlier level."
Notice that the first half of the passage showed the reverse: supply decreased (fewer hens), so price rose from $2.50 to $4.75.
Completed: the supply of eggs increased, so the price of eggs fell.
Tip: Supply up → price down. Supply down → price up (when demand doesn't change). Draw a quick arrow for each change if it helps you keep them straight.
Question 24 of 35 · Structure and design of the U.S. government
Fill inPopulation and Representation
Seats in the U.S. House of Representatives are divided among the states according to population, counted in a census every ten years. Every state has two senators. In a presidential election, each state's number of electoral votes is its number of House seats plus two. The table shows four fictional states.
Use the table and its rule. How many electoral votes does Brevia have?
electoral votes
Type your answer in the box. Fractions like 3/4 are fine.
Hint
Find Brevia's number of House seats. Then add the number of senators every state has.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the table: Brevia has 8 seats in the House. The rule below the table says a state's electoral votes equal "its number of seats in the House of Representatives plus its two senators."
Step by step:
House seats for Brevia: 8.
Senators for every state: 2.
Electoral votes: 8 + 2 = 10.
Brevia has 10 electoral votes.
Background: This same rule applies to real U.S. states. Even the smallest state has at least 3 electoral votes (1 House seat + 2 senators). The total is 538 because the 435 House seats plus 100 senators equal 535, and the District of Columbia receives 3 more under the Twenty-third Amendment.
Tip: Read the note under a table carefully. On the GED, the rule you need is often printed in small type right below the data.
Question 25 of 35 · Political parties, campaigns and elections
Population and Representation
Seats in the U.S. House of Representatives are divided among the states according to population, counted in a census every ten years. Every state has two senators. In a presidential election, each state's number of electoral votes is its number of House seats plus two. The table shows four fictional states.
Which conclusion is best supported by the table and its rule?
Hint
Find each state's electoral votes first. Then divide population by electoral votes to see how many people one electoral vote represents.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the table: Aldon has 12,600,000 people and 18 House seats, so 18 + 2 = 20 electoral votes. Dunmore has 600,000 people and 1 House seat, so 1 + 2 = 3 electoral votes.
Step by step:
People per electoral vote in Aldon: 12{,}600{,}000 \div 20 = 630{,}000.
People per electoral vote in Dunmore: 600{,}000 \div 3 = 200{,}000.
So one electoral vote in Dunmore stands for far fewer people than one in Aldon. The two "extra" votes for senators give small states a bigger share relative to their population.
Check the others:
Dunmore has 3 electoral votes and Aldon has 20, so Dunmore does not have more total influence.
House seats are not equal: they range from 1 to 18.
Aldon has 21 times Dunmore's population (12{,}600{,}000 \div 600{,}000 = 21) but only about 6.7 times as many electoral votes (20 \div 3 \approx 6.7), not 21 times.
The correct answer is one electoral vote in Dunmore represents fewer people than one electoral vote in Aldon.
Tip: "Per person" or "per capita" comparisons require division. A small state can have fewer total votes yet more votes per person.
Question 26 of 35 · Revolutionary and early republic periods
Hot spotThe Founding Era, 1765–1791
The timeline lists major events in the founding of the United States, in the order they happened.
Look at the timeline. Click the event that happened after the Treaty of Paris ended the Revolutionary War but before the Constitutional Convention met.
Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).
Hint
Find the two events named in the question. The answer is the event between them.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the timeline: The Treaty of Paris is listed at 1783. The Constitutional Convention is listed at 1787.
Step by step:
Locate 1783 (Treaty of Paris) and 1787 (Constitutional Convention).
Look for an event with a date after 1783 and before 1787.
Only one event fits: 1786, Shays' Rebellion begins in Massachusetts.
1781 (Articles take effect) is before the Treaty, and 1788 (ratification) is after the Convention.
The correct answer is Shays' Rebellion (1786).
Historical connection: The timing is not an accident. Shays' Rebellion convinced many leaders that the national government under the Articles was too weak, which helped build support for the Convention the next year.
Tip: For "between" questions on a timeline, mark the two boundary events first, then look only at what falls inside them.
Question 27 of 35 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities
Tinker v. Des Moines (1969)
Summary written for this app, with one quoted sentence from the Supreme Court's majority opinion.
(1) In December 1965, a group of students in Des Moines, Iowa, decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the Vietnam War. School officials learned of the plan and adopted a rule that any student wearing an armband would be asked to remove it and would be suspended if they refused. Several students, including 13-year-old Mary Beth Tinker, wore armbands and were suspended. Their families sued the school district.
(2) In 1969, the Supreme Court ruled 7–2 in favor of the students. Writing for the majority, Justice Abe Fortas stated: "It can hardly be argued that either students or teachers shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate."
(3) The Court explained that wearing the armbands was a quiet, peaceful form of expression protected by the First Amendment. The armbands had not disrupted classes or interfered with other students' rights. A school, the Court said, may limit student expression when it would substantially disrupt school activities or invade the rights of others, but it may not ban expression simply because officials want to avoid the discomfort of an unpopular viewpoint.
Based on the Court's reasoning in paragraph 3, which school action would most likely be allowed?
Hint
The Court gave a test: does the expression substantially disrupt school activities or invade others' rights? Find the choice that meets that test.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3 says a school "may limit student expression when it would substantially disrupt school activities or invade the rights of others," but "may not ban expression simply because officials want to avoid the discomfort of an unpopular viewpoint."
Step by step:
Apply the test to each choice: Is there a substantial disruption or an invasion of others' rights?
Students who block hallways and stop classes clearly disrupt school activities. Disciplining them would most likely be allowed.
A peaceful T-shirt, a quiet button and a letter written off campus cause no disruption. Banning them would look like avoiding "an unpopular viewpoint," which the Court rejected.
The correct answer is disciplining students whose protest blocked hallways and kept classes from meeting.
Note: The ruling protects the message but not every manner of expressing it. Students may protest, but not in a way that stops the school from functioning.
Tip: When a question asks you to apply a court ruling, restate the ruling as a simple test, then run each choice through it.
Question 28 of 35 · Macroeconomics
Grocery Prices and Wages
Riverton is a fictional city. The graph uses index numbers. Both grocery prices and average hourly wages are set to 100 in 2019. A value of 116 means 16% higher than in 2019.
Which statement about Riverton workers' purchasing power is best supported by the graph?
Hint
Purchasing power falls when prices rise faster than wages. For each choice, compare how much each line went up during the period named.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence from the graph: Grocery prices: 100, 102, 107, 116, 121, 124 (2019–2024). Wages: 100, 104, 107, 111, 116, 120.
Step by step:
Purchasing power is how much a paycheck can buy. It falls when prices grow faster than wages.
2021 → 2022: prices rose 116 - 107 = 9 points; wages rose 111 - 107 = 4 points. Prices outpaced wages, so purchasing power fell. ✔
2019 → 2020: wages (104) rose more than prices (102), so purchasing power rose. Eliminate.
By 2024: wages are at 120 and prices at 124. Wages have not grown more than prices since 2019. Eliminate.
In 2021, both indexes equal 107. That means both had grown 7% since 2019. It does not mean prices stopped rising: prices rose from 102 to 107 that year. Eliminate.
The correct answer is from 2021 to 2022, prices rose faster than wages, so purchasing power fell.
Tip: With index numbers, equal values mean equal growth since the base year, not zero change. Always compare the change over the period the question names.
Question 29 of 35 · Human migration
Drag and dropLeaving Millbrook
Millbrook is a fictional farm town.
(1) In 2000, about 6,000 people lived in Millbrook. Today, about 4,000 do. Most of those who left were young adults.
(2) Farming has changed. Large farms now use machines that can plant and harvest huge fields with just a few workers, so farm jobs have disappeared. The town's only medical clinic closed five years ago, and the nearest hospital is now an hour's drive away.
(3) Two hundred miles away, the city of Harlow is growing quickly. Its hospitals and clinics are hiring nurses, technicians and office staff. A university in Harlow offers scholarships to students from rural areas. Many Millbrook families already have relatives living in Harlow who can help newcomers find housing and work.
(4) Some former residents say they would return to Millbrook if they could find steady jobs there.
Drag each factor into the correct category.
Push factors (reasons to leave Millbrook)
Pull factors (reasons to move to Harlow)
Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.
Hint
Ask about each factor: is it a problem in Millbrook, or an attraction in Harlow?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence:
Paragraph 2: large farms use machines, so "farm jobs have disappeared," and "the town's only medical clinic closed." These are problems in Millbrook.
Paragraph 3: Harlow's hospitals "are hiring," and "many Millbrook families already have relatives living in Harlow." These are attractions in Harlow.
Step by step:
Push factors are conditions that drive people away from their home: lost farm jobs and the closed clinic.
Pull factors are conditions that attract people to a new place: health care jobs in Harlow and relatives already living there.
A useful check: push factors are found in paragraph 2 (about Millbrook); pull factors are found in paragraph 3 (about Harlow).
Push: farm jobs lost to machines; the local clinic closed. Pull: health care jobs in Harlow; relatives already living in Harlow.
Tip: Family networks are a strong pull factor in real migration. People tend to move where relatives or neighbors have already settled, which is called chain migration.
Question 30 of 35 · Revolutionary and early republic periods
Thomas Paine, Common Sense (1776)
In January 1776, Thomas Paine published Common Sense, a pamphlet that argued in plain language that the American colonies should declare independence from Great Britain. It was read and discussed throughout the colonies.
(1) "Society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one."
(2) "The cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind."
In excerpt 2, Paine most likely claims that "the cause of America is in a great measure the cause of all mankind" in order to
Hint
Think about Paine's purpose in writing the pamphlet. Why would he make the colonists' struggle seem bigger than the colonies?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: The introduction says Paine "argued … that the American colonies should declare independence." Excerpt 2 connects the American "cause" to "all mankind."
Step by step:
Paine's purpose was to persuade colonists to support independence.
By calling America's cause "the cause of all mankind," he presents the fight as important for people everywhere, not just a local quarrel over taxes. That makes the cause seem more worthy of sacrifice.
He does not call for America to conquer other nations; "cause" here means a goal or principle, not a military campaign.
He does not say all people already enjoy freedom. If they did, the cause would not need fighting for.
Seeking compromise with Britain is the opposite of Paine's argument for independence.
The correct answer is persuade colonists that their struggle for independence mattered to people everywhere.
Tip: For "author's purpose" questions about primary sources, start with what the introduction tells you about who wrote it and why. Choices that contradict that purpose can be eliminated quickly.
Question 31 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
Should 16-Year-Olds Vote in City Elections?
The city council of Lakeport, a fictional city, is debating whether to let residents who are 16 and 17 years old vote in city elections only (for mayor, city council and local ballot questions). Two council members spoke at a public hearing.
Council Member A
(1) Our young people already have a stake in this city. Many 16- and 17-year-olds work part-time jobs and pay sales tax on what they buy. City decisions about buses, parks, libraries and summer jobs affect them every day. About 1,200 Lakeport residents are 16 or 17 years old, and they have no voice in these choices.
(2) Voting is a habit. Young people who vote in their first eligible election are more likely to keep voting as adults. At 16, most teens still live at home and attend school, where they can learn about candidates and how to vote. At 18, many are moving away for college or work just when they first become eligible. Letting them start in local elections would build lifelong voters.
Council Member B
(3) I respect our young people, but I believe 16-year-olds are not yet mature enough to make these decisions. Most still depend on their parents and may simply vote the way their families tell them to.
(4) The Twenty-sixth Amendment protects the right to vote of citizens who are 18 or older. It does not require cities to let younger residents vote, and almost every city in the country uses 18 as the voting age. Our city clerk estimates that creating and maintaining a separate voter list for city-only elections would cost about $40,000 per year. In my view, the council should focus on more urgent problems, such as repairing our roads.
Which statement from Council Member B is a fact rather than an opinion?
Hint
A fact can be checked and proved true or false. An opinion expresses a belief or a judgment, often with words like I believe, should or in my view.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 4 says: "Our city clerk estimates that creating and maintaining a separate voter list for city-only elections would cost about $40,000 per year."
Step by step:
A fact is a statement that can be checked. Anyone can confirm that the clerk made this estimate and review the numbers behind it.
"16-year-olds are not yet mature enough" is introduced with "I believe." It is a judgment. People reasonably disagree about it.
"The council should focus on more urgent problems" uses should and "in my view," so it is a recommendation, which is an opinion.
"Most still depend on their parents and may simply vote the way their families tell them to" combines an observation with a prediction about how teens may behave, which cannot be proved; it supports the speaker's opinion.
The correct answer is the city clerk's estimate that a separate voter list would cost about $40,000 per year.
Tip: Signal words such as I believe, should, best and in my view usually mark opinions. Numbers, dates and named sources usually mark facts, though you should still check whether they can be verified.
Question 32 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
Should 16-Year-Olds Vote in City Elections?
The city council of Lakeport, a fictional city, is debating whether to let residents who are 16 and 17 years old vote in city elections only (for mayor, city council and local ballot questions). Two council members spoke at a public hearing.
Council Member A
(1) Our young people already have a stake in this city. Many 16- and 17-year-olds work part-time jobs and pay sales tax on what they buy. City decisions about buses, parks, libraries and summer jobs affect them every day. About 1,200 Lakeport residents are 16 or 17 years old, and they have no voice in these choices.
(2) Voting is a habit. Young people who vote in their first eligible election are more likely to keep voting as adults. At 16, most teens still live at home and attend school, where they can learn about candidates and how to vote. At 18, many are moving away for college or work just when they first become eligible. Letting them start in local elections would build lifelong voters.
Council Member B
(3) I respect our young people, but I believe 16-year-olds are not yet mature enough to make these decisions. Most still depend on their parents and may simply vote the way their families tell them to.
(4) The Twenty-sixth Amendment protects the right to vote of citizens who are 18 or older. It does not require cities to let younger residents vote, and almost every city in the country uses 18 as the voting age. Our city clerk estimates that creating and maintaining a separate voter list for city-only elections would cost about $40,000 per year. In my view, the council should focus on more urgent problems, such as repairing our roads.
Which additional evidence would most strengthen Council Member A's argument in paragraph 2?
Hint
Identify A's main claim in paragraph 2 first. The best evidence will directly support that specific claim.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: In paragraph 2, Council Member A claims that "voting is a habit" and that letting 16-year-olds vote in local elections "would build lifelong voters."
Step by step:
A's claim is about the long-term effect of voting early: people who start voting young keep voting.
The strongest evidence would show that, in places that allowed 16- and 17-year-olds to vote, those young voters actually turned out and kept voting later. That directly tests A's claim.
Phone ownership says nothing about voting habits. It is irrelevant.
Data on teen driving accidents relates to maturity in a different activity. If anything, it might be used by Council Member B, not A.
Low turnout among 18- to 24-year-olds shows a problem exists, but it does not show that lowering the voting age would solve it. It is weaker than direct evidence about 16- and 17-year-old voters.
The correct answer is a study showing that in cities that lowered the voting age, 16- and 17-year-olds voted at rates similar to or higher than older first-time voters and kept voting later.
Tip: To strengthen an argument, find evidence that matches the exact claim. Evidence that is merely on the same topic, or that only shows a problem exists, is weaker.
Question 33 of 35 · Contemporary public policy
Protecting Borrowers: Federal Credit Laws
(1) Before 1968, lenders in the United States described the cost of loans in many different ways, which made it hard for borrowers to compare offers. That year, Congress passed the Truth in Lending Act. It requires lenders to tell borrowers the key terms of a loan or credit card in writing before the borrower agrees, including the annual percentage rate (APR) and the total finance charge. Because every lender must state the APR in the same way, borrowers can compare offers side by side.
(2) In 2009, Congress passed the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act, often called the Credit CARD Act. Among other things, it requires card companies to give customers 45 days' notice before making major changes such as raising interest rates, and it requires monthly statements to show how long it would take to pay off the balance by making only the minimum payment.
(3) These laws generally do not tell lenders what interest rate to charge. Instead, they require lenders to share clear information so that consumers can make their own choices. Since 2011, the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has been responsible for enforcing many of these rules.
Based on the passage, what is the main approach these federal credit laws take to protect consumers?
Hint
Paragraph 3 sums up the approach in two sentences: what the laws generally don't do, and what they do instead.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3 says: "These laws generally do not tell lenders what interest rate to charge. Instead, they require lenders to share clear information so that consumers can make their own choices."
Step by step:
Paragraph 1: the Truth in Lending Act requires lenders to disclose the APR and finance charge "in writing."
Paragraph 2: the Credit CARD Act requires advance notice of changes and payoff information on statements.
Both are disclosure rules: they make lenders share information.
A national maximum interest rate is ruled out by paragraph 3: the laws "generally do not tell lenders what interest rate to charge."
Nothing says the government lends money directly or bans credit cards for young people.
The correct answer is requiring lenders to disclose clear, comparable information so consumers can make informed choices.
Tip: Many consumer-protection laws work through disclosure, not price controls. Knowing the APR lets you compare loans, which is exactly the skill you used on the credit card table earlier in this test.
Question 34 of 35 · European settlement and population of the Americas
Counting a New Nation: The Census of 1790
(1) Article I of the Constitution requires an "actual Enumeration," or count, of the population every ten years. The count is used to decide how many seats each state receives in the House of Representatives. The first census took place in 1790. Officials called marshals traveled on horseback and on foot, going door to door.
(2) The 1790 census counted about 3.9 million people. Nearly 700,000 of them were enslaved, almost all of African descent; they or their ancestors had been brought to the Americas by force. About 60,000 free Black Americans were also counted. Most free residents were of European ancestry, especially English, but there were also large communities of German, Scottish, Scots-Irish, Irish and Dutch descent, many of whom had chosen to immigrate in search of land and opportunity.
(3) The count was not complete. American Indians living in their own nations were not included. And under the Constitution's Three-Fifths Clause, only three-fifths of the enslaved population was counted when House seats were divided among the states.
Which conclusion about the population of the United States in 1790 is best supported by the passage?
Hint
Check each choice against paragraphs 2 and 3. Watch for choices that say "every" or "fully" when the passage describes limits.
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 2 says nearly 700,000 people were enslaved and "had been brought to the Americas by force," while many people of European descent "had chosen to immigrate in search of land and opportunity."
Step by step:
The passage describes two very different kinds of migration: forced migration of enslaved Africans and voluntary immigration from Europe. Both shaped the population. ✔
"Every person living within the nation's borders" is contradicted by paragraph 3: "American Indians living in their own nations were not included."
"Enslaved people were fully counted when House seats were assigned" is contradicted by the Three-Fifths Clause in paragraph 3.
Nothing in the passage says most people lived in cities. The marshals' travel on horseback and on foot hints at a spread-out, mostly rural population.
The correct answer is the population was shaped by both voluntary immigration from Europe and the forced migration of enslaved Africans.
Tip: A "best supported" conclusion must be backed by the text and must not be contradicted anywhere else in it. Read to the end of the passage before you decide.
Question 35 of 35 · Development of classical civilizations
Ancient Roots of American Government
(1) The men who wrote the Constitution had studied the governments of the ancient world. Two examples were especially important to them: Athens and Rome.
(2) In ancient Athens, around 2,500 years ago, citizens governed through direct democracy. Free adult male citizens could attend the Assembly and vote on laws and decisions about war themselves. Many public officials were chosen by drawing lots. Women, enslaved people and foreigners could not take part.
(3) The Roman Republic, founded about the same time, worked differently. Roman citizens elected officials to govern for them. A Senate of experienced leaders advised the government and helped make decisions, and two elected consuls shared executive power so that neither could rule alone. The word republic comes from the Latin res publica, meaning "the public thing."
(4) Many founders worried that direct democracy would not work in a large country and could let a passing majority act rashly. They preferred a republic, in which citizens elect representatives to make laws. They even borrowed Roman words: the United States has a Senate, and Congress meets in the Capitol.
According to the passage, which feature of the U.S. government reflects the Roman Republic rather than Athenian democracy?
Hint
Paragraph 2 describes Athens; paragraph 3 describes Rome. Which choice matches Rome, and also the U.S. system?
Step-by-step solution
Evidence: Paragraph 3 says that in the Roman Republic, "citizens elected officials to govern for them." Paragraph 4 says the founders "preferred a republic, in which citizens elect representatives to make laws."
Step by step:
The U.S. system, in which voters elect members of Congress who make laws, matches the Roman model of representation.
"Citizens vote directly on every law" describes the Athenian Assembly (paragraph 2), which is direct democracy, not a republic.
"Officials chosen by drawing lots" also describes Athens (paragraph 2).
"A single ruler who holds all executive power" is the opposite of Rome's two consuls, who "shared executive power so that neither could rule alone."
The correct answer is citizens elect representatives who make laws on their behalf.
Tip: Direct democracy = people vote on laws themselves (Athens). Republic / representative democracy = people elect others to make laws (Rome, the United States).