Social Studies Mixed Practice Test 6

Question 1 of 20 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

Limits on Government Power

Excerpt 1: Massachusetts Constitution (1780), Part the First, Article XXX

(1) "In the government of this commonwealth, the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them: the executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them: the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them: to the end it may be a government of laws and not of men."

Excerpt 2: U.S. Constitution (1787), Article I

(2) Section 7: "All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills."

(3) Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises,…"

(4) Section 9: "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it."

(5) Section 9: "No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed."

Word help: commonwealth = state; to the end = so that; revenue = money the government collects; originate = start; concur = agree; duties, imposts, excises = kinds of taxes; writ of habeas corpus = a court order requiring officials to bring a jailed person before a judge and show a lawful reason for holding him or her; bill of attainder = a law that declares a person guilty and punishes him or her without a trial; ex post facto law = a law that punishes an act that was legal when it was done.

In March 2026, Congress passes a law making it a federal crime to post advertising signs on mailboxes. Prosecutors then charge a man for signs he posted in 2025, when posting them was legal.

Which part of Excerpt 2 does this prosecution violate, and why?

Answer choices
Hint

Check the word help for ex post facto law.

Question 2 of 20 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Dividing Power Between the Nation and the States

From the U.S. Constitution

(1) Article I, Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises," … "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;" … "To establish Post Offices and post Roads;" …

(2) Article I, Section 8 (last clause): "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

(3) Article I, Section 10: "No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit;" …

(4) Article VI: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

(5) Tenth Amendment (1791): "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Word help: commerce = trade; foregoing = listed before; letters of marque and reprisal = permits for private ships to attack enemy ships; emit bills of credit = issue paper money; in pursuance thereof = following from it; notwithstanding = in spite of; delegated = given.

Which action by Congress relies on an implied power, a power that comes from the Necessary and Proper Clause (paragraph 2) rather than one listed word for word?

Answer choices
Hint

Look for the action that does not appear in the list of powers in paragraph 1 but helps Congress carry one of them out.

Question 3 of 20 · Structure and design of the U.S. government

Dividing Power Between the Nation and the States

From the U.S. Constitution

(1) Article I, Section 8: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises," … "To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;" … "To establish Post Offices and post Roads;" …

(2) Article I, Section 8 (last clause): "To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof."

(3) Article I, Section 10: "No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit;" …

(4) Article VI: "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding."

(5) Tenth Amendment (1791): "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

Word help: commerce = trade; foregoing = listed before; letters of marque and reprisal = permits for private ships to attack enemy ships; emit bills of credit = issue paper money; in pursuance thereof = following from it; notwithstanding = in spite of; delegated = given.

Every state requires electricians to pass an exam before they can get a license. No part of the Constitution gives Congress the power to license electricians, and nothing forbids the states from doing it.

Which part of the excerpts best explains why states have this power?

Answer choices
Hint

Which excerpt talks about powers that are neither delegated to the United States nor prohibited to the states?

Question 4 of 20 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities

Changing Course: Six Supreme Court Decisions

(1) The Supreme Court can overrule its own earlier decisions. Over the 1900s, the Court also ruled, one right at a time, that most protections in the Bill of Rights limit state governments as well as the federal government. It based these rulings on the Fourteenth Amendment, which says no state may deprive any person of liberty "without due process of law." The summaries below are written for this app.

(2) Betts v. Brady (1942) and Gideon v. Wainwright (1963). In Betts, the Court ruled that a state did not have to give a free lawyer to every poor person accused of a felony; a lawyer was required only in special circumstances. Twenty-one years later, Gideon overruled Betts. The Court held that a state must provide a lawyer to any person accused of a serious crime who cannot afford one.

(3) Wolf v. Colorado (1949) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961). In Wolf, the Court said the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches applies to the states, but it did not require state courts to throw out evidence that police had gathered illegally. Then, in 1957, police in Cleveland, Ohio, forced their way into Dollree Mapp's home without showing a valid search warrant and found materials that were later used to convict her. In Mapp, the Court ruled 6–3 that evidence gathered in an unconstitutional search may not be used in state courts. This is called the exclusionary rule. On this point, Mapp overruled Wolf.

(4) Engel v. Vitale (1962). New York state officials wrote a short prayer that did not favor any one religion, and some public schools had students recite it each morning. Students who did not wish to pray could stay silent or leave the room. The Court ruled 6–1 that the practice violated the First Amendment's ban on an "establishment of religion." Government officials may not write official prayers for students to recite in public schools, even when the prayer favors no religion and taking part is voluntary.

(5) New Jersey v. T.L.O. (1985). A teacher found a 14-year-old student smoking in a school bathroom. An assistant vice principal searched her purse and found evidence that she had broken the law. The Court ruled 6–3 that the Fourth Amendment does apply to searches by public school officials, but that they do not need a warrant or probable cause. A school search is allowed if there are reasonable grounds to suspect it will turn up evidence that the student broke the law or a school rule, and if the search is not excessively intrusive.

(6) Texas v. Johnson (1989). During a protest outside the 1984 Republican National Convention in Dallas, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag. He was convicted under a Texas law against damaging a flag. The Court ruled 5–4 that burning a flag as a political protest is expression protected by the First Amendment. The government may not ban the expression of an idea simply because society finds the idea offensive or disagreeable.

According to paragraph 3, what did the Supreme Court decide in Mapp v. Ohio (1961)?

Answer choices
Hint

Separate the facts (what the police did) from the ruling (what the Court decided must happen).

Question 5 of 20 · Individual rights and civic responsibilities

Select all
Are Rights Unlimited?

A handout from a fictional adult-education civics course.

(1) The rights in the Bill of Rights are strong, but they are not absolute. Courts often weigh one person's freedom against the rights of others and the safety of the public.

(2) Speech. In general, the government may not punish speech just because people find the message offensive, rude or unpopular. However, a few kinds of speech are not protected: speech that is meant to cause, and is likely to cause, immediate illegal action (called incitement); true threats to harm a specific person; and defamation — false statements of fact that damage someone's reputation.

(3) Time, place and manner. The government may set reasonable rules about when, where and how people speak or gather, as long as the rules are neutral about the message and leave other ways to communicate. For example, a city may require a permit for a march that will block a busy street, or limit loudspeakers in neighborhoods late at night. It may not give permits only to groups whose views officials like.

(4) Religion. People may believe whatever they wish. However, a person usually must still obey a general law that applies to everyone, even if the law conflicts with a religious practice. Congress and many states have passed laws that give religious practice extra protection in some situations.

(5) Who is limited? The First Amendment limits the government. It does not stop a private business from setting rules for its own workers. In many cases, a private employer may discipline an employee for things the employee says on the job.

(6) Courts decide hard cases one at a time, looking closely at the facts. Two situations that seem alike can have different results.

Based on the handout, which actions would not violate the First Amendment? Select all that apply.

Select all that apply.

Answer choices
Hint

Check each action against paragraphs 2, 3 and 5: Is it a neutral time/place/manner rule, an unprotected kind of speech, or something done by a private business?

Question 6 of 20 · Political parties, campaigns and elections

Select all
Voter Turnout by Age

(1) Election officials in the fictional state of Lakeland reported how many eligible citizens in each age group voted in two statewide elections. Turnout is the percent of eligible citizens who actually voted.

(2) The chart shows the results.

Grouped bar chart: voter turnout by age group in the fictional state of Lakeland, 2018 and 2022 elections (percent of eligible citizens who voted). 18–24: 31% in 2018, 39% in 2022. 25–34: 40%, 44%. 35–44: 50%, 52%. 45–64: 60%, 61%. 65+: 68%, 67%. Voter Turnout by Age Group, Lakeland (fictional) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Percent of eligible citizens who voted 31% 39% 18–24 40% 44% 25–34 50% 52% 35–44 60% 61% 45–64 68% 67% 65+ Age group 2018 2022

Which statements are supported by the chart? Select all that apply.

Select all that apply.

Answer choices
Hint

Read each bar label carefully. Remember: the chart shows percents, not numbers of people, and it gives no reasons.

Question 7 of 20 · Contemporary public policy

Two Views on a School Phone Bill

The legislature of the fictional state of Delmar is considering House Bill 40. The bill would require every public school to keep students' cell phones stored away — for example, in lockers or locked pouches — for the entire school day, including lunch. Schools would have to allow exceptions for students with medical needs, and parents could still reach their children through the school office. Below are statements from two fictional people.

State Representative Joanna Pike (supports HB 40)

(1) Teachers in my district tell me the same story: phones pull students' attention away from lessons many times a day. Rules that change from classroom to classroom are hard to enforce, so one clear statewide rule is fairer to teachers and students alike.

(2) Several schools in our state that already store phones all day report fewer fights recorded on video and more conversation at lunch. Students deserve a full school day to focus on learning and on each other.

(3) HB 40 keeps the school office as a reliable way for families to reach students, and it lets a doctor's note override the rule for students who need their devices for health reasons.

Lionel Grant, President of the Delmar Parents' Council (opposes HB 40 as written)

(4) I share Representative Pike's concern about distraction. Phones should not be out during lessons, and many of our members support stronger classroom rules.

(5) But a single rule for every school ignores real differences. A high school senior who drives to an after-school job is not a second grader. Local school boards, which answer to local voters, are better placed to set rules that fit their own students.

(6) Buying lockable pouches and storage for every student costs money, and HB 40 provides no state funding, so districts would have to cut something else to pay for it. Parents also worry about reaching their children quickly during an emergency.

A news reporter wants to describe the HB 40 debate neutrally, without favoring either side. Which sentence best meets this goal?

Answer choices
Hint

A neutral sentence reports what each side says, using calm words, and does not state either side's claim as fact.

Question 8 of 20 · Fundamental economic concepts

Drop-down
Kayak Rentals at Pine Lake

Several small businesses rent kayaks by the hour at Pine Lake, a fictional summer lake. The graph and table show the demand (D) for kayak rentals and the supply (S) of kayak rentals on a typical summer day.

Supply and demand graph for kayak rentals. Vertical axis: price per hour, 0 to 35 dollars. Horizontal axis: kayak-hours rented per day, 0 to 120. Demand line D slopes down: 100 at 10 dollars, 80 at 15, 60 at 20, 40 at 25, 20 at 30. Supply line S slopes up: 20 at 10 dollars, 40 at 15, 60 at 20, 80 at 25, 100 at 30. The lines cross at point E, a price of 20 dollars and 60 kayak-hours. Kayak Rentals at Pine Lake $0 $5 $10 $15 $20 $25 $30 $35 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Quantity (kayak-hours rented per day) Price per hour D S E
Price per hourKayak-hours demandedKayak-hours supplied
$1010020
$158040
$206060
$254080
$3020100

Complete the sentence using the graph and table.

At Pine Lake, the market is in equilibrium at a price of per hour, where kayak-hours are rented each day.

Choose an answer from each menu.

Hint

Find point E on the graph. Read the price axis for the first blank and the quantity axis for the second.

Question 9 of 20 · Fundamental economic concepts

Drag and drop
Rosa's Food Truck

(1) For six years, Rosa worked as a cook in a hospital kitchen, earning $38,000 a year. Last spring she decided to quit and open her own food truck selling tacos. She also had an offer to manage a restaurant for $34,000 a year, but she turned it down too.

(2) Rosa used her savings to buy a used truck, a grill, and a refrigerator. She rents a parking space on a busy lot near the city's riverfront park, and she hired her nephew Marco to take orders during the lunch rush. Starting the business was Rosa's idea, and if the truck loses money, Rosa takes the loss.

(3) Rosa's biggest problem is time. The lot is open only from 11 a.m. to 3 p.m., and she can cook only so many tacos in four hours. Each day she must decide whether to spend her limited grill space on tacos, which sell quickly, or on burritos, which earn more per sale but take longer to make.

(4) The city wants to cut waste in the park. It now gives a $300 yearly grant to any food truck that uses only compostable plates and forks. It also fines vendors $100 for each bag of trash left behind at closing.

Drag each resource Rosa uses into the correct factor of production.

Land (natural resources and location)Labor (human work)Capital (tools, machines, buildings)Entrepreneurship (idea and risk)

Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.

Hint

Ask: is it a place or natural resource, a person's work, a tool made by people, or the idea and risk of starting the business?

Question 10 of 20 · Consumer economics

Hot spot
The Okafor Household Budget

(1) Chidi and Grace Okafor have two young children. Chidi drives a delivery van and Grace works as a pharmacy technician. Together their take-home (net) pay is $4,300 per month. The chart and table show their planned spending and saving.

Horizontal bar chart of the Okafor household's planned monthly spending and saving, in dollars: Rent, 1,450; Groceries, 620; Child care, 520; Savings deposit, 300; Restaurants and takeout, 260; Gasoline, 210; Electric and gas, 190; Car insurance, 140; Gym membership, 60; Streaming services, 45. Total 3,795 dollars. Okafor household: planned monthly spending 0 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 1,500 Rent $1,450 Groceries $620 Child care $520 Savings deposit $300 Restaurants and takeout $260 Gasoline $210 Electric and gas $190 Car insurance $140 Gym membership $60 Streaming services $45 Dollars per month
CategoryMonthly amount
Rent$1,450
Electric and gas$190
Groceries$620
Car insurance$140
Gasoline$210
Child care$520
Streaming services$45
Restaurants and takeout$260
Gym membership$60
Savings deposit$300
Total$3,795

(2) The rent, car insurance, child care, streaming services, gym membership and savings deposit are the same every month. The other amounts change from month to month.

(3) The Okafors already have $1,800 in an emergency fund. Their goal is to build it to $9,000. They add their savings deposit to the fund each month and do not take money out.

(4) One popular budgeting guideline, the 50/30/20 rule, suggests spending about 50 percent of take-home pay on needs, about 30 percent on wants, and about 20 percent on saving and paying down debt. The Okafors count rent, utilities, groceries, car insurance, gasoline and child care as needs.

Click the bar for the Okafors' largest variable expense.

Click on the figure to mark your answer (or focus it and use the arrow keys).

Horizontal bar chart of the Okafor household's planned monthly spending and saving, in dollars: Rent, 1,450; Groceries, 620; Child care, 520; Savings deposit, 300; Restaurants and takeout, 260; Gasoline, 210; Electric and gas, 190; Car insurance, 140; Gym membership, 60; Streaming services, 45. Total 3,795 dollars. Okafor household: planned monthly spending 0 250 500 750 1,000 1,250 1,500 Rent $1,450 Groceries $620 Child care $520 Savings deposit $300 Restaurants and takeout $260 Gasoline $210 Electric and gas $190 Car insurance $140 Gym membership $60 Streaming services $45 Dollars per month
Hint

First decide which bars are variable (paragraph 2). Then compare only those bars.

Question 11 of 20 · Environment and societal development

Conservation and the Dust Bowl

Source 1 — President Theodore Roosevelt, speech to a conference of state governors at the White House, 1908

We have become great in a material sense because of the lavish use of our resources, and we have just reason to be proud of our growth. But the time has come to inquire seriously what will happen when our forests are gone, when the coal, the iron, the oil, and the gas are exhausted, when the soils shall have been still further impoverished and washed into the streams, polluting the rivers, denuding the fields, and obstructing navigation.

Source 2 — A modern summary written for this lesson

(1) In the early 1900s, high wheat prices and new tractors encouraged farmers to plow millions of acres of grassland on the southern Great Plains. For thousands of years, deep-rooted prairie grasses had held the soil in place, even during dry spells.

(2) In the 1930s, a severe drought struck. With the grass gone, nothing held down the dry, loose topsoil. Strong winds lifted it into enormous dust storms. On April 14, 1935 — "Black Sunday" — a wall of dust rolled across the Oklahoma and Texas Panhandles and turned day into night. The worst-hit area became known as the Dust Bowl.

(3) Crops failed, and many farm families lost their land. Hundreds of thousands of people left the Plains, and many headed west to California in search of work.

(4) The federal government responded. In 1935, Congress created the Soil Conservation Service to teach farmers methods such as contour plowing, crop rotation, and planting rows of trees as windbreaks. Over time, these practices helped hold the soil in place.

According to Source 2, which combination of factors caused the dust storms of the 1930s?

Answer choices
Hint

Paragraph 1 describes something people did; paragraph 2 describes what nature did. You need both.

Question 12 of 20 · Borders between peoples and nations

Two Treaty Borders

In the 1840s the United States set two of its longest borders by treaty. The Oregon Treaty (1846) divided the Oregon Country with Great Britain, which then ruled Canada. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848) ended the Mexican–American War. (A league is an old unit of distance, about three miles.)

Source 1 — From the Oregon Treaty, Article I (1846)

From the point on the forty-ninth parallel of north latitude, where the boundary laid down in existing treaties and conventions between the United States and Great Britain terminates, the line of boundary between the territories of the United States and those of her Britannic Majesty shall be continued westward along the said forty-ninth parallel of north latitude to the middle of the channel which separates the continent from Vancouver's Island…

Source 2 — From the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Article V (1848)

The boundary line between the two Republics shall commence in the Gulf of Mexico, three leagues from land, opposite the mouth of the Rio Grande, otherwise called Rio Bravo del Norte, … from thence up the middle of that river, following the deepest channel, where it has more than one, to the point where it strikes the southern boundary of New Mexico…

According to Source 1, the border described in Article I of the Oregon Treaty is best classified as

Answer choices
Hint

Look at what the line follows as it runs westward. Is it a river, a mountain range, or a line on the map?

Question 13 of 20 · Human migration

Talmora's Changing Population

Talmora is a fictional country. The two population pyramids show Talmora's population in 1990 and in 2020. Each bar shows how many males or females were in a 10-year age group. The youngest group is at the bottom.

Two population pyramids for the fictional country of Talmora, in 1990 and in 2020. Population in millions by 10-year age group, males on the left (blue) and females on the right (green), youngest at the bottom. 1990: 0–9: 3.6 male, 3.5 female; 10–19: 3 male, 2.9 female; 20–29: 2.4 male, 2.4 female; 30–39: 1.8 male, 1.9 female; 40–49: 1.3 male, 1.4 female; 50–59: 0.9 male, 1 female; 60–69: 0.5 male, 0.6 female; 70+: 0.3 male, 0.4 female. 1990 is widest at the base and narrows steadily toward the top. 2020: 0–9: 2.2 male, 2.1 female; 10–19: 2.6 male, 2.5 female; 20–29: 3 male, 2.9 female; 30–39: 3.4 male, 3.3 female; 40–49: 2.9 male, 2.9 female; 50–59: 2.2 male, 2.3 female; 60–69: 1.4 male, 1.6 female; 70+: 0.8 male, 1.1 female. 2020 is narrower at the base and widest in the 30–39 age group. Talmora, 1990 Male Female 0–9 10–19 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70+ 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Population (millions) Talmora, 2020 Male Female 0–9 10–19 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 70+ 0 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 Population (millions)

Based on the two pyramids, how did Talmora's birth rate most likely change between 1990 and 2020?

Answer choices
Hint

Compare the bottom bar (ages 0–9) of each pyramid. Those are the children born most recently.

Question 14 of 20 · European settlement and population of the Americas

Drag and drop
A Letter Home from Wisconsin (1853)

This letter is fictional. It was written for this app, based on the kinds of letters German immigrants sent home in the 1850s. "Johanna Becker" is not a real person.

(1) Dear Sister, You asked whether you and Karl should follow us. Let me tell you plainly what we have found.

(2) You remember why we left Hesse. Two potato harvests failed in a row, the landlord raised our rent every year, and after the uprising of 1848 the soldiers were everywhere. Papa said there was no future for the boys there.

(3) Here the government land office sold us 80 acres at $1.25 an acre. Cousin Friedrich, who came two years before us, met us in Milwaukee and found Heinrich work on the docks until our first crop was in. In our town there are two German churches, and no one asks which one we attend.

(4) I will not pretend it is easy. The winter was colder than any in Hesse, and our baby was sick for a month. Wisconsin is surely the finest place on God's earth, but you must bring warm blankets and every coin you can save.

(5) Come in the spring, when the ships are less crowded. Your loving sister, Johanna

Read "A Letter Home from Wisconsin (1853)." Drag each detail from Johanna's letter to show whether it was a push factor or a pull factor for her family.

Push factor (a reason to leave Germany)Pull factor (a reason to come to Wisconsin)

Tap a tile, then tap a box to place it.

Hint

A push factor is a problem at home. A pull factor is an attraction in the new place. Ask: is this detail about Hesse or about Wisconsin?

Question 15 of 20 · World War I and World War II

Two Historians on the Atomic Bomb

The two views below were written for this app by fictional historians. They describe a real debate among historians.

Historian A (Dr. Ruth Calder, fictional)

(1) On August 6, 1945, a U.S. bomber dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, and a second bomb destroyed Nagasaki on August 9. Japan announced its surrender on August 15. American planners expected an invasion of Japan's home islands, planned for November 1945, to be extremely costly; the battle for Okinawa that spring had killed more than 12,000 Americans. In my judgment, President Truman made the only reasonable choice: the bombs ended the war quickly and saved lives on both sides.

Historian B (Dr. Samuel Ortega, fictional)

(2) The two bombs killed well over 100,000 people, most of them civilians. Japan was already badly weakened: U.S. firebombing had burned many of its cities, and a naval blockade was cutting off food and fuel. On August 8, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan, and it invaded Manchuria the next day. I believe Japan's leaders might have surrendered without the bombs, especially if the United States had promised that Japan could keep its emperor.

Read both views in "Two Historians on the Atomic Bomb."

Which statement best describes how the two historians' views differ?

Answer choices
Hint

Do they disagree about what happened or about whether it was necessary? Check whether each choice is assigned to the right historian.

Question 16 of 20 · American foreign policy since 9/11

Select all
September 11, 2001, and the Government's Response

(1) On the morning of September 11, 2001, nineteen terrorists from the al Qaeda network hijacked four passenger airplanes. They crashed two into the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center in New York City and one into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the Department of Defense, near Washington, D.C. On the fourth plane, United Flight 93, passengers fought back, and the plane crashed in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania. Nearly 3,000 people were killed.

(2) On September 14, Congress passed a joint resolution called the Authorization for Use of Military Force, which the president signed on September 18. It stated "that the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons …"

(3) In 2002, Congress and the president created an independent, bipartisan commission to study the attacks. Its 2004 report stated: "The 9/11 attacks were a shock, but they should not have come as a surprise." The commission concluded that the attacks "revealed four kinds of failures: in imagination, policy, capabilities, and management," and it recommended changes in how intelligence agencies share information.

Select all of the statements that are supported by "September 11, 2001, and the Government's Response."

Select all that apply.

Answer choices
Hint

Check each statement against a specific sentence. Watch for details that are changed slightly.

Question 17 of 20 · American foreign policy since 9/11

The Surge and Drawdown in Afghanistan
Bar chart: approximate number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan. Jan. 2009: about 32,000; 2010–11 peak: about 100,000; May 2014: about 32,000; Early 2015: about 9,800; Early 2017: about 8,400; Sept. 2021: 0. Figures as announced by the White House; the last U.S. troops left on August 30, 2021. U.S. Troops in Afghanistan, 2009–2021 (approximate) 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 U.S. troops about 32,000 Jan. 2009 about 100,000 2010–11 peak about 32,000 May 2014 about 9,800 Early 2015 about 8,400 Early 2017 0 Sept. 2021

(1) When Barack Obama became president in January 2009, the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan was growing stronger. In a speech at West Point on December 1, 2009, Obama said: "When I took office, we had just over 32,000 Americans serving in Afghanistan, compared to 160,000 in Iraq at the peak of the war." He announced that he had "determined that it is in our vital national interest to send an additional 30,000 U.S. troops to Afghanistan." He added: "After 18 months, our troops will begin to come home."

(2) In June 2011, Obama announced that 10,000 troops would leave Afghanistan by the end of that year. On May 27, 2014, he said U.S. forces had been reduced "from a peak of 100,000 U.S. troops, to roughly 32,000 today," and that about 9,800 would remain at the beginning of 2015 to train Afghan forces and support counterterrorism operations. This gradual reduction of forces is called a drawdown.

(3) In 2016, Obama decided to keep about 8,400 troops in Afghanistan into 2017. In February 2020, the United States signed an agreement with the Taliban that set a timeline for withdrawing all U.S. forces. The last U.S. troops left Afghanistan on August 30, 2021.

As it is used in paragraph 2 and in the title of the passage, the word drawdown means

Answer choices
Hint

Look at the numbers in paragraph 2. Were they going up or down?

Question 18 of 20 · Types of modern and historical governments

In one U.S. state, citizens who collect enough signatures can place a proposed law on the ballot. On Election Day, voters approve or reject the law themselves, and if it passes, it takes effect without any vote by the state legislature.

This process is an example of which form of government at work?

Answer choices
Hint

Who makes the final decision on the law: elected representatives or the voters themselves?

Question 19 of 20 · Principles of American constitutional democracy

A state governor ordered a local newspaper to shut down after it published articles criticizing her. The state's highest court ordered the newspaper reopened, ruling that nothing in the state constitution gives the governor that power and that the order violates freedom of the press.

Which principle does the court's ruling best illustrate?

Answer choices
Hint

The court said the governor acted beyond the powers she was given. Which principle says government may do only what its constitution allows?

Question 20 of 20 · Types of modern and historical governments

Which statement correctly describes the difference between a dictatorship and an oligarchy?

Answer choices
Hint

Count the rulers. How many people hold power in each form?